Cargando…

Ageing and dementia: age-period-cohort effects of policy intervention in England, 2006–2016

BACKGROUND: Dementia is one of the most critical challenges of our time. According to the Dementia Statistics Hub, only about 66 % of all UK residents with dementia were diagnosed in 2017–2018. Yet, there are reservations about the early diagnosis of dementia-related diseases. As a result, the UK Na...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kolpashnikova, Kamila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8235903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34174814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02341-4
_version_ 1783714425784500224
author Kolpashnikova, Kamila
author_facet Kolpashnikova, Kamila
author_sort Kolpashnikova, Kamila
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dementia is one of the most critical challenges of our time. According to the Dementia Statistics Hub, only about 66 % of all UK residents with dementia were diagnosed in 2017–2018. Yet, there are reservations about the early diagnosis of dementia-related diseases. As a result, the UK National Screening Committee does not recommend systematic population screening of dementia, although case-finding strategies are still applied for high-risk groups. METHODS: This study added additional evidence of the effectiveness of the National Dementia Strategy and increased numbers of diagnosis of dementia on the younger cohorts of the older people, using the intrinsic estimator age-period-cohort (APC) models and the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing data. RESULTS: Age effects show that diagnosis increases in volume only among those aged 75 and above, suggesting that many of those aged below 75 might not be diagnosed in time. Period effects show that although there was an initial increase due to the new policy implementation, the trend stalled in later years, indicating that the increase might not have been even across the period when controlled for age and cohort. The study also shows that cohort effects indicate lower prevalence in younger cohorts controlled for age and period effects. CONCLUSIONS: Although more research in diverse contexts is warranted, this study cautions against the abandonment of timely diagnosis, increased screening and case-finding, and shows some effectiveness of prevention strategies on the national level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8235903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82359032021-06-28 Ageing and dementia: age-period-cohort effects of policy intervention in England, 2006–2016 Kolpashnikova, Kamila BMC Geriatr Research BACKGROUND: Dementia is one of the most critical challenges of our time. According to the Dementia Statistics Hub, only about 66 % of all UK residents with dementia were diagnosed in 2017–2018. Yet, there are reservations about the early diagnosis of dementia-related diseases. As a result, the UK National Screening Committee does not recommend systematic population screening of dementia, although case-finding strategies are still applied for high-risk groups. METHODS: This study added additional evidence of the effectiveness of the National Dementia Strategy and increased numbers of diagnosis of dementia on the younger cohorts of the older people, using the intrinsic estimator age-period-cohort (APC) models and the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing data. RESULTS: Age effects show that diagnosis increases in volume only among those aged 75 and above, suggesting that many of those aged below 75 might not be diagnosed in time. Period effects show that although there was an initial increase due to the new policy implementation, the trend stalled in later years, indicating that the increase might not have been even across the period when controlled for age and cohort. The study also shows that cohort effects indicate lower prevalence in younger cohorts controlled for age and period effects. CONCLUSIONS: Although more research in diverse contexts is warranted, this study cautions against the abandonment of timely diagnosis, increased screening and case-finding, and shows some effectiveness of prevention strategies on the national level. BioMed Central 2021-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8235903/ /pubmed/34174814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02341-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kolpashnikova, Kamila
Ageing and dementia: age-period-cohort effects of policy intervention in England, 2006–2016
title Ageing and dementia: age-period-cohort effects of policy intervention in England, 2006–2016
title_full Ageing and dementia: age-period-cohort effects of policy intervention in England, 2006–2016
title_fullStr Ageing and dementia: age-period-cohort effects of policy intervention in England, 2006–2016
title_full_unstemmed Ageing and dementia: age-period-cohort effects of policy intervention in England, 2006–2016
title_short Ageing and dementia: age-period-cohort effects of policy intervention in England, 2006–2016
title_sort ageing and dementia: age-period-cohort effects of policy intervention in england, 2006–2016
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8235903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34174814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02341-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kolpashnikovakamila ageinganddementiaageperiodcohorteffectsofpolicyinterventioninengland20062016