Cargando…

Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review

Collective efficacy, defined as a group’s shared belief about its conjoint capability to organize and execute courses of action, plays a pivotal role in understanding the dynamics of sports teams, since it influences what individuals choose to do as team members, how much they invest in motivational...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alves, Mylena Aparecida Rodrigues, de Souza Lencina, Marcus Vinicius, Paes, Mayara Juliana, Stefanello, Joice Mara Facco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8236009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34173889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41155-021-00183-y
_version_ 1783714450016043008
author Alves, Mylena Aparecida Rodrigues
de Souza Lencina, Marcus Vinicius
Paes, Mayara Juliana
Stefanello, Joice Mara Facco
author_facet Alves, Mylena Aparecida Rodrigues
de Souza Lencina, Marcus Vinicius
Paes, Mayara Juliana
Stefanello, Joice Mara Facco
author_sort Alves, Mylena Aparecida Rodrigues
collection PubMed
description Collective efficacy, defined as a group’s shared belief about its conjoint capability to organize and execute courses of action, plays a pivotal role in understanding the dynamics of sports teams, since it influences what individuals choose to do as team members, how much they invest in motivational terms to perform actions, how much they work collectively, and for how long they persist despite failure. Through a systematic review, it was investigated how collective efficacy has been assessed in the context of soccer and which indicators, attributes, and psychometric properties have been contemplated in the instruments used. Following the PRISMA guidelines, 22 articles were retrieved through electronic databases (APA PsycINFO; SPORTDiscus; Science Direct; BVS; Web of Science; Scopus; PubMed; and Scielo), using as descriptors, in English, Spanish, and Portuguese, collective efficacy and soccer, combined by the Boolean operators AND and OR. The study did not delimit the initial year of publication for the searches carried out, including all articles found until January 14, 2021 (date of the last update). The following eligibility criteria were adopted: scientific articles published in journals; original studies, which specified the instrument used to assess collective efficacy and carried out with soccer athletes. Five instruments (FCEQ, CEQS, CEI, CEC, and CEQsoccer) that evaluated technical-tactical and psychological attributes associated with collective efficacy in soccer players were identified. In most studies, psychometric properties were restricted to content validity and reliability (internal consistency), and there were no suitable validation processes for the instruments used to measure collective efficacy, which can be considered a limiting factor for understanding this psychological construct in soccer modality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8236009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82360092021-07-09 Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review Alves, Mylena Aparecida Rodrigues de Souza Lencina, Marcus Vinicius Paes, Mayara Juliana Stefanello, Joice Mara Facco Psicol Reflex Crit Review Collective efficacy, defined as a group’s shared belief about its conjoint capability to organize and execute courses of action, plays a pivotal role in understanding the dynamics of sports teams, since it influences what individuals choose to do as team members, how much they invest in motivational terms to perform actions, how much they work collectively, and for how long they persist despite failure. Through a systematic review, it was investigated how collective efficacy has been assessed in the context of soccer and which indicators, attributes, and psychometric properties have been contemplated in the instruments used. Following the PRISMA guidelines, 22 articles were retrieved through electronic databases (APA PsycINFO; SPORTDiscus; Science Direct; BVS; Web of Science; Scopus; PubMed; and Scielo), using as descriptors, in English, Spanish, and Portuguese, collective efficacy and soccer, combined by the Boolean operators AND and OR. The study did not delimit the initial year of publication for the searches carried out, including all articles found until January 14, 2021 (date of the last update). The following eligibility criteria were adopted: scientific articles published in journals; original studies, which specified the instrument used to assess collective efficacy and carried out with soccer athletes. Five instruments (FCEQ, CEQS, CEI, CEC, and CEQsoccer) that evaluated technical-tactical and psychological attributes associated with collective efficacy in soccer players were identified. In most studies, psychometric properties were restricted to content validity and reliability (internal consistency), and there were no suitable validation processes for the instruments used to measure collective efficacy, which can be considered a limiting factor for understanding this psychological construct in soccer modality. Springer International Publishing 2021-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8236009/ /pubmed/34173889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41155-021-00183-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Alves, Mylena Aparecida Rodrigues
de Souza Lencina, Marcus Vinicius
Paes, Mayara Juliana
Stefanello, Joice Mara Facco
Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review
title Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review
title_full Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review
title_fullStr Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review
title_short Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review
title_sort collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8236009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34173889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41155-021-00183-y
work_keys_str_mv AT alvesmylenaaparecidarodrigues collectiveefficacyinsoccerteamsasystematicreview
AT desouzalencinamarcusvinicius collectiveefficacyinsoccerteamsasystematicreview
AT paesmayarajuliana collectiveefficacyinsoccerteamsasystematicreview
AT stefanellojoicemarafacco collectiveefficacyinsoccerteamsasystematicreview