Cargando…
Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review
Collective efficacy, defined as a group’s shared belief about its conjoint capability to organize and execute courses of action, plays a pivotal role in understanding the dynamics of sports teams, since it influences what individuals choose to do as team members, how much they invest in motivational...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8236009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34173889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41155-021-00183-y |
_version_ | 1783714450016043008 |
---|---|
author | Alves, Mylena Aparecida Rodrigues de Souza Lencina, Marcus Vinicius Paes, Mayara Juliana Stefanello, Joice Mara Facco |
author_facet | Alves, Mylena Aparecida Rodrigues de Souza Lencina, Marcus Vinicius Paes, Mayara Juliana Stefanello, Joice Mara Facco |
author_sort | Alves, Mylena Aparecida Rodrigues |
collection | PubMed |
description | Collective efficacy, defined as a group’s shared belief about its conjoint capability to organize and execute courses of action, plays a pivotal role in understanding the dynamics of sports teams, since it influences what individuals choose to do as team members, how much they invest in motivational terms to perform actions, how much they work collectively, and for how long they persist despite failure. Through a systematic review, it was investigated how collective efficacy has been assessed in the context of soccer and which indicators, attributes, and psychometric properties have been contemplated in the instruments used. Following the PRISMA guidelines, 22 articles were retrieved through electronic databases (APA PsycINFO; SPORTDiscus; Science Direct; BVS; Web of Science; Scopus; PubMed; and Scielo), using as descriptors, in English, Spanish, and Portuguese, collective efficacy and soccer, combined by the Boolean operators AND and OR. The study did not delimit the initial year of publication for the searches carried out, including all articles found until January 14, 2021 (date of the last update). The following eligibility criteria were adopted: scientific articles published in journals; original studies, which specified the instrument used to assess collective efficacy and carried out with soccer athletes. Five instruments (FCEQ, CEQS, CEI, CEC, and CEQsoccer) that evaluated technical-tactical and psychological attributes associated with collective efficacy in soccer players were identified. In most studies, psychometric properties were restricted to content validity and reliability (internal consistency), and there were no suitable validation processes for the instruments used to measure collective efficacy, which can be considered a limiting factor for understanding this psychological construct in soccer modality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8236009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82360092021-07-09 Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review Alves, Mylena Aparecida Rodrigues de Souza Lencina, Marcus Vinicius Paes, Mayara Juliana Stefanello, Joice Mara Facco Psicol Reflex Crit Review Collective efficacy, defined as a group’s shared belief about its conjoint capability to organize and execute courses of action, plays a pivotal role in understanding the dynamics of sports teams, since it influences what individuals choose to do as team members, how much they invest in motivational terms to perform actions, how much they work collectively, and for how long they persist despite failure. Through a systematic review, it was investigated how collective efficacy has been assessed in the context of soccer and which indicators, attributes, and psychometric properties have been contemplated in the instruments used. Following the PRISMA guidelines, 22 articles were retrieved through electronic databases (APA PsycINFO; SPORTDiscus; Science Direct; BVS; Web of Science; Scopus; PubMed; and Scielo), using as descriptors, in English, Spanish, and Portuguese, collective efficacy and soccer, combined by the Boolean operators AND and OR. The study did not delimit the initial year of publication for the searches carried out, including all articles found until January 14, 2021 (date of the last update). The following eligibility criteria were adopted: scientific articles published in journals; original studies, which specified the instrument used to assess collective efficacy and carried out with soccer athletes. Five instruments (FCEQ, CEQS, CEI, CEC, and CEQsoccer) that evaluated technical-tactical and psychological attributes associated with collective efficacy in soccer players were identified. In most studies, psychometric properties were restricted to content validity and reliability (internal consistency), and there were no suitable validation processes for the instruments used to measure collective efficacy, which can be considered a limiting factor for understanding this psychological construct in soccer modality. Springer International Publishing 2021-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8236009/ /pubmed/34173889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41155-021-00183-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Alves, Mylena Aparecida Rodrigues de Souza Lencina, Marcus Vinicius Paes, Mayara Juliana Stefanello, Joice Mara Facco Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review |
title | Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review |
title_full | Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review |
title_short | Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review |
title_sort | collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8236009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34173889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41155-021-00183-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alvesmylenaaparecidarodrigues collectiveefficacyinsoccerteamsasystematicreview AT desouzalencinamarcusvinicius collectiveefficacyinsoccerteamsasystematicreview AT paesmayarajuliana collectiveefficacyinsoccerteamsasystematicreview AT stefanellojoicemarafacco collectiveefficacyinsoccerteamsasystematicreview |