Cargando…
A scoping review of researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogue in Africa
BACKGROUND: Improving evidence-informed policy dialogue to support the development and implementation of national health policies is vital, but there is limited evidence on researchers’ roles in policy dialogue processes in Africa. The objective of this study is to examine researchers’ involvement i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8236190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34174957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01745-y |
_version_ | 1783714487327522816 |
---|---|
author | Yimgang, Doris Danhoundo, Georges Kusi-Appiah, Elizabeth Sunder, Vijit Campbell, Sandra Yaya, Sanni |
author_facet | Yimgang, Doris Danhoundo, Georges Kusi-Appiah, Elizabeth Sunder, Vijit Campbell, Sandra Yaya, Sanni |
author_sort | Yimgang, Doris |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Improving evidence-informed policy dialogue to support the development and implementation of national health policies is vital, but there is limited evidence on researchers’ roles in policy dialogue processes in Africa. The objective of this study is to examine researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogue in Africa. METHODS: The database search of this scoping review was conducted from inception to January 24, 2021, by an expert searcher/librarian to determine the extent of evidence, barriers, and facilitators of researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogues in Africa. PROSPERO, Wiley Cochrane Library, OVID Medline, OVID EMBASE, OVID PsycINFO, OVID Global Health, EBSCO CINAHL, BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine), and Google/Google Scholar were searched using key words representing the concepts “policy dialogue”, “health”, and “Africa”. No limits were applied. A narrative summary of results was presented. RESULTS: There were 26 eligible studies representing 21 African countries. Significant discrepancies in researchers’ involvement existed across countries. In 62% of the countries, there was suboptimal involvement of researchers in policy dialogues due to no or partial participation in policy dialogues. Major barriers included limited funding, lack of evidence in the public health field of interest, and skepticism of policymakers. The presence of an interface for exchange, demand for scientific evidence, and donors’ funding were the most reported facilitators. CONCLUSIONS: To improve the uptake of evidence in health policy-making processes, an environment of trust and communication between policymakers and researchers must be established. Policymakers need to demonstrate that they value research, by providing adequate funding, promoting knowledge translation activities, and supporting personal and professional development opportunities for researchers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01745-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8236190 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82361902021-06-28 A scoping review of researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogue in Africa Yimgang, Doris Danhoundo, Georges Kusi-Appiah, Elizabeth Sunder, Vijit Campbell, Sandra Yaya, Sanni Syst Rev Systematic Review Update BACKGROUND: Improving evidence-informed policy dialogue to support the development and implementation of national health policies is vital, but there is limited evidence on researchers’ roles in policy dialogue processes in Africa. The objective of this study is to examine researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogue in Africa. METHODS: The database search of this scoping review was conducted from inception to January 24, 2021, by an expert searcher/librarian to determine the extent of evidence, barriers, and facilitators of researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogues in Africa. PROSPERO, Wiley Cochrane Library, OVID Medline, OVID EMBASE, OVID PsycINFO, OVID Global Health, EBSCO CINAHL, BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine), and Google/Google Scholar were searched using key words representing the concepts “policy dialogue”, “health”, and “Africa”. No limits were applied. A narrative summary of results was presented. RESULTS: There were 26 eligible studies representing 21 African countries. Significant discrepancies in researchers’ involvement existed across countries. In 62% of the countries, there was suboptimal involvement of researchers in policy dialogues due to no or partial participation in policy dialogues. Major barriers included limited funding, lack of evidence in the public health field of interest, and skepticism of policymakers. The presence of an interface for exchange, demand for scientific evidence, and donors’ funding were the most reported facilitators. CONCLUSIONS: To improve the uptake of evidence in health policy-making processes, an environment of trust and communication between policymakers and researchers must be established. Policymakers need to demonstrate that they value research, by providing adequate funding, promoting knowledge translation activities, and supporting personal and professional development opportunities for researchers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01745-y. BioMed Central 2021-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8236190/ /pubmed/34174957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01745-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Update Yimgang, Doris Danhoundo, Georges Kusi-Appiah, Elizabeth Sunder, Vijit Campbell, Sandra Yaya, Sanni A scoping review of researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogue in Africa |
title | A scoping review of researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogue in Africa |
title_full | A scoping review of researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogue in Africa |
title_fullStr | A scoping review of researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogue in Africa |
title_full_unstemmed | A scoping review of researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogue in Africa |
title_short | A scoping review of researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogue in Africa |
title_sort | scoping review of researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogue in africa |
topic | Systematic Review Update |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8236190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34174957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01745-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yimgangdoris ascopingreviewofresearchersinvolvementinhealthpolicydialogueinafrica AT danhoundogeorges ascopingreviewofresearchersinvolvementinhealthpolicydialogueinafrica AT kusiappiahelizabeth ascopingreviewofresearchersinvolvementinhealthpolicydialogueinafrica AT sundervijit ascopingreviewofresearchersinvolvementinhealthpolicydialogueinafrica AT campbellsandra ascopingreviewofresearchersinvolvementinhealthpolicydialogueinafrica AT yayasanni ascopingreviewofresearchersinvolvementinhealthpolicydialogueinafrica AT yimgangdoris scopingreviewofresearchersinvolvementinhealthpolicydialogueinafrica AT danhoundogeorges scopingreviewofresearchersinvolvementinhealthpolicydialogueinafrica AT kusiappiahelizabeth scopingreviewofresearchersinvolvementinhealthpolicydialogueinafrica AT sundervijit scopingreviewofresearchersinvolvementinhealthpolicydialogueinafrica AT campbellsandra scopingreviewofresearchersinvolvementinhealthpolicydialogueinafrica AT yayasanni scopingreviewofresearchersinvolvementinhealthpolicydialogueinafrica |