Cargando…

A scoping review of researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogue in Africa

BACKGROUND: Improving evidence-informed policy dialogue to support the development and implementation of national health policies is vital, but there is limited evidence on researchers’ roles in policy dialogue processes in Africa. The objective of this study is to examine researchers’ involvement i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yimgang, Doris, Danhoundo, Georges, Kusi-Appiah, Elizabeth, Sunder, Vijit, Campbell, Sandra, Yaya, Sanni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8236190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34174957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01745-y
_version_ 1783714487327522816
author Yimgang, Doris
Danhoundo, Georges
Kusi-Appiah, Elizabeth
Sunder, Vijit
Campbell, Sandra
Yaya, Sanni
author_facet Yimgang, Doris
Danhoundo, Georges
Kusi-Appiah, Elizabeth
Sunder, Vijit
Campbell, Sandra
Yaya, Sanni
author_sort Yimgang, Doris
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Improving evidence-informed policy dialogue to support the development and implementation of national health policies is vital, but there is limited evidence on researchers’ roles in policy dialogue processes in Africa. The objective of this study is to examine researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogue in Africa. METHODS: The database search of this scoping review was conducted from inception to January 24, 2021, by an expert searcher/librarian to determine the extent of evidence, barriers, and facilitators of researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogues in Africa. PROSPERO, Wiley Cochrane Library, OVID Medline, OVID EMBASE, OVID PsycINFO, OVID Global Health, EBSCO CINAHL, BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine), and Google/Google Scholar were searched using key words representing the concepts “policy dialogue”, “health”, and “Africa”. No limits were applied. A narrative summary of results was presented. RESULTS: There were 26 eligible studies representing 21 African countries. Significant discrepancies in researchers’ involvement existed across countries. In 62% of the countries, there was suboptimal involvement of researchers in policy dialogues due to no or partial participation in policy dialogues. Major barriers included limited funding, lack of evidence in the public health field of interest, and skepticism of policymakers. The presence of an interface for exchange, demand for scientific evidence, and donors’ funding were the most reported facilitators. CONCLUSIONS: To improve the uptake of evidence in health policy-making processes, an environment of trust and communication between policymakers and researchers must be established. Policymakers need to demonstrate that they value research, by providing adequate funding, promoting knowledge translation activities, and supporting personal and professional development opportunities for researchers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01745-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8236190
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82361902021-06-28 A scoping review of researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogue in Africa Yimgang, Doris Danhoundo, Georges Kusi-Appiah, Elizabeth Sunder, Vijit Campbell, Sandra Yaya, Sanni Syst Rev Systematic Review Update BACKGROUND: Improving evidence-informed policy dialogue to support the development and implementation of national health policies is vital, but there is limited evidence on researchers’ roles in policy dialogue processes in Africa. The objective of this study is to examine researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogue in Africa. METHODS: The database search of this scoping review was conducted from inception to January 24, 2021, by an expert searcher/librarian to determine the extent of evidence, barriers, and facilitators of researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogues in Africa. PROSPERO, Wiley Cochrane Library, OVID Medline, OVID EMBASE, OVID PsycINFO, OVID Global Health, EBSCO CINAHL, BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine), and Google/Google Scholar were searched using key words representing the concepts “policy dialogue”, “health”, and “Africa”. No limits were applied. A narrative summary of results was presented. RESULTS: There were 26 eligible studies representing 21 African countries. Significant discrepancies in researchers’ involvement existed across countries. In 62% of the countries, there was suboptimal involvement of researchers in policy dialogues due to no or partial participation in policy dialogues. Major barriers included limited funding, lack of evidence in the public health field of interest, and skepticism of policymakers. The presence of an interface for exchange, demand for scientific evidence, and donors’ funding were the most reported facilitators. CONCLUSIONS: To improve the uptake of evidence in health policy-making processes, an environment of trust and communication between policymakers and researchers must be established. Policymakers need to demonstrate that they value research, by providing adequate funding, promoting knowledge translation activities, and supporting personal and professional development opportunities for researchers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01745-y. BioMed Central 2021-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8236190/ /pubmed/34174957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01745-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Systematic Review Update
Yimgang, Doris
Danhoundo, Georges
Kusi-Appiah, Elizabeth
Sunder, Vijit
Campbell, Sandra
Yaya, Sanni
A scoping review of researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogue in Africa
title A scoping review of researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogue in Africa
title_full A scoping review of researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogue in Africa
title_fullStr A scoping review of researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogue in Africa
title_full_unstemmed A scoping review of researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogue in Africa
title_short A scoping review of researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogue in Africa
title_sort scoping review of researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogue in africa
topic Systematic Review Update
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8236190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34174957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01745-y
work_keys_str_mv AT yimgangdoris ascopingreviewofresearchersinvolvementinhealthpolicydialogueinafrica
AT danhoundogeorges ascopingreviewofresearchersinvolvementinhealthpolicydialogueinafrica
AT kusiappiahelizabeth ascopingreviewofresearchersinvolvementinhealthpolicydialogueinafrica
AT sundervijit ascopingreviewofresearchersinvolvementinhealthpolicydialogueinafrica
AT campbellsandra ascopingreviewofresearchersinvolvementinhealthpolicydialogueinafrica
AT yayasanni ascopingreviewofresearchersinvolvementinhealthpolicydialogueinafrica
AT yimgangdoris scopingreviewofresearchersinvolvementinhealthpolicydialogueinafrica
AT danhoundogeorges scopingreviewofresearchersinvolvementinhealthpolicydialogueinafrica
AT kusiappiahelizabeth scopingreviewofresearchersinvolvementinhealthpolicydialogueinafrica
AT sundervijit scopingreviewofresearchersinvolvementinhealthpolicydialogueinafrica
AT campbellsandra scopingreviewofresearchersinvolvementinhealthpolicydialogueinafrica
AT yayasanni scopingreviewofresearchersinvolvementinhealthpolicydialogueinafrica