Cargando…

Peri-Implant bone response around porous-surface dental implants: A preclinical meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: This meta-analysis of relevant animal studies was conducted to assess whether the use of porous-surface implants improves osseointegration compared to the use of non-porous-surface implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic search of PubMed (MEDLINE) resulted in the selection of ten...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmed, Abeer, Al-Rasheed, Abdulaziz, Badwelan, Mohammed, Alghamdi, Hamdan S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8236543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34194186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.12.006
_version_ 1783714559887933440
author Ahmed, Abeer
Al-Rasheed, Abdulaziz
Badwelan, Mohammed
Alghamdi, Hamdan S
author_facet Ahmed, Abeer
Al-Rasheed, Abdulaziz
Badwelan, Mohammed
Alghamdi, Hamdan S
author_sort Ahmed, Abeer
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This meta-analysis of relevant animal studies was conducted to assess whether the use of porous-surface implants improves osseointegration compared to the use of non-porous-surface implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic search of PubMed (MEDLINE) resulted in the selection of ten animal studies (out of 865 publications) for characterization and quality assessment. Risk of bias assessment indicated poor reporting for the majority of studies. The results for bone-implant contact (BIC%) and peri-implant bone formation (BF%) were extracted from the eligible studies and used for the meta-analysis. Data for porous-surface implants were compared to those for non-porous-surface implants, which were considered as the controls. RESULTS: The random-effects meta-analysis showed that the use of porous-surface implants did not significantly increase overall BIC% (mean difference or MD: 3.63%; 95% confidence interval or 95% CI: −1.66 to 8.91; p = 0.18), whereas it significantly increased overall BF% (MD: 5.43%; CI: 2.20 to 8.67; p = 0.001), as compared to the controls. CONCLUSION: Porous-surface implants promote osseointegration with increase in BF%. However, their use shows no significant effect on BIC%. Further preclinical and clinical investigations are required to find conclusive evidence on the effect of porous-surface implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8236543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82365432021-06-29 Peri-Implant bone response around porous-surface dental implants: A preclinical meta-analysis Ahmed, Abeer Al-Rasheed, Abdulaziz Badwelan, Mohammed Alghamdi, Hamdan S Saudi Dent J Original Article INTRODUCTION: This meta-analysis of relevant animal studies was conducted to assess whether the use of porous-surface implants improves osseointegration compared to the use of non-porous-surface implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic search of PubMed (MEDLINE) resulted in the selection of ten animal studies (out of 865 publications) for characterization and quality assessment. Risk of bias assessment indicated poor reporting for the majority of studies. The results for bone-implant contact (BIC%) and peri-implant bone formation (BF%) were extracted from the eligible studies and used for the meta-analysis. Data for porous-surface implants were compared to those for non-porous-surface implants, which were considered as the controls. RESULTS: The random-effects meta-analysis showed that the use of porous-surface implants did not significantly increase overall BIC% (mean difference or MD: 3.63%; 95% confidence interval or 95% CI: −1.66 to 8.91; p = 0.18), whereas it significantly increased overall BF% (MD: 5.43%; CI: 2.20 to 8.67; p = 0.001), as compared to the controls. CONCLUSION: Porous-surface implants promote osseointegration with increase in BF%. However, their use shows no significant effect on BIC%. Further preclinical and clinical investigations are required to find conclusive evidence on the effect of porous-surface implants. Elsevier 2021-07 2020-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8236543/ /pubmed/34194186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.12.006 Text en © 2021 King Saud University https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Ahmed, Abeer
Al-Rasheed, Abdulaziz
Badwelan, Mohammed
Alghamdi, Hamdan S
Peri-Implant bone response around porous-surface dental implants: A preclinical meta-analysis
title Peri-Implant bone response around porous-surface dental implants: A preclinical meta-analysis
title_full Peri-Implant bone response around porous-surface dental implants: A preclinical meta-analysis
title_fullStr Peri-Implant bone response around porous-surface dental implants: A preclinical meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Peri-Implant bone response around porous-surface dental implants: A preclinical meta-analysis
title_short Peri-Implant bone response around porous-surface dental implants: A preclinical meta-analysis
title_sort peri-implant bone response around porous-surface dental implants: a preclinical meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8236543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34194186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.12.006
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedabeer periimplantboneresponsearoundporoussurfacedentalimplantsapreclinicalmetaanalysis
AT alrasheedabdulaziz periimplantboneresponsearoundporoussurfacedentalimplantsapreclinicalmetaanalysis
AT badwelanmohammed periimplantboneresponsearoundporoussurfacedentalimplantsapreclinicalmetaanalysis
AT alghamdihamdans periimplantboneresponsearoundporoussurfacedentalimplantsapreclinicalmetaanalysis