Cargando…
Rates of Clostridioides difficile at an Urban Hospital During Initial COVID Pandemic Wave
BACKGROUND: During the first three months of the COVID 19 pandemic, our facility cared for an influx of patients. At the peak, the daily census exceeded 200 patients with COVID 19. Surveillance for healthcare acquired infections (HAIs) continued throughout this time. Despite the acuity of the patien...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Mosby, Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8236758/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2021.04.012 |
_version_ | 1783714607894888448 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Barbara A. Kim, Kilyoub Yassin, Arsheena Camins, Bernard Gottlieb, Lindsey |
author_facet | Smith, Barbara A. Kim, Kilyoub Yassin, Arsheena Camins, Bernard Gottlieb, Lindsey |
author_sort | Smith, Barbara A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: During the first three months of the COVID 19 pandemic, our facility cared for an influx of patients. At the peak, the daily census exceeded 200 patients with COVID 19. Surveillance for healthcare acquired infections (HAIs) continued throughout this time. Despite the acuity of the patients and the frequent use of antibiotics, the rates of Clostridioides difficile lab ID (CDI) events remained relatively stable. We sought to determine the validity of this rate. METHODS: To determine if cases of CDI were missed, we compared the 3-month rate per 10,000 patient days in 2020 to the same time-period in 2019 (March, April, and May). The number of tests ordered during the two periods was also compared. Additionally, the Doctor of Pharmacy from our antibiotic stewardship team reviewed all orders for oral Vancomycin to determine if empiric CDI treatment was initiated without confirmatory testing. RESULTS: The CDI rate for the 3 months in 2019 was zero compared to 0.48 per 10,000 patient days during the peak of the pandemic. The number of tests increased in the 2020 period to 17.5 per 10,000 patient days versus 15.8 in the 2019 period. Three patients received oral Vancomycin, each of whom had valid indications. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this data, CDI cases were not underreported. We speculate that the lack of an increase in CDI rates may be attributed to: Increased hand hygiene by staff – compliance increased to 91 % in 2020 compared to 83 % in 2019,enhanced attention to cleaning and high level disinfection, and Improved adherence to use of personal protective equipment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8236758 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Published by Mosby, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82367582021-06-28 Rates of Clostridioides difficile at an Urban Hospital During Initial COVID Pandemic Wave Smith, Barbara A. Kim, Kilyoub Yassin, Arsheena Camins, Bernard Gottlieb, Lindsey Am J Infect Control Ads 04 BACKGROUND: During the first three months of the COVID 19 pandemic, our facility cared for an influx of patients. At the peak, the daily census exceeded 200 patients with COVID 19. Surveillance for healthcare acquired infections (HAIs) continued throughout this time. Despite the acuity of the patients and the frequent use of antibiotics, the rates of Clostridioides difficile lab ID (CDI) events remained relatively stable. We sought to determine the validity of this rate. METHODS: To determine if cases of CDI were missed, we compared the 3-month rate per 10,000 patient days in 2020 to the same time-period in 2019 (March, April, and May). The number of tests ordered during the two periods was also compared. Additionally, the Doctor of Pharmacy from our antibiotic stewardship team reviewed all orders for oral Vancomycin to determine if empiric CDI treatment was initiated without confirmatory testing. RESULTS: The CDI rate for the 3 months in 2019 was zero compared to 0.48 per 10,000 patient days during the peak of the pandemic. The number of tests increased in the 2020 period to 17.5 per 10,000 patient days versus 15.8 in the 2019 period. Three patients received oral Vancomycin, each of whom had valid indications. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this data, CDI cases were not underreported. We speculate that the lack of an increase in CDI rates may be attributed to: Increased hand hygiene by staff – compliance increased to 91 % in 2020 compared to 83 % in 2019,enhanced attention to cleaning and high level disinfection, and Improved adherence to use of personal protective equipment. Published by Mosby, Inc. 2021-06 2021-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8236758/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2021.04.012 Text en Copyright © 2021 Published by Mosby, Inc. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Ads 04 Smith, Barbara A. Kim, Kilyoub Yassin, Arsheena Camins, Bernard Gottlieb, Lindsey Rates of Clostridioides difficile at an Urban Hospital During Initial COVID Pandemic Wave |
title | Rates of Clostridioides difficile at an Urban Hospital During Initial COVID Pandemic Wave |
title_full | Rates of Clostridioides difficile at an Urban Hospital During Initial COVID Pandemic Wave |
title_fullStr | Rates of Clostridioides difficile at an Urban Hospital During Initial COVID Pandemic Wave |
title_full_unstemmed | Rates of Clostridioides difficile at an Urban Hospital During Initial COVID Pandemic Wave |
title_short | Rates of Clostridioides difficile at an Urban Hospital During Initial COVID Pandemic Wave |
title_sort | rates of clostridioides difficile at an urban hospital during initial covid pandemic wave |
topic | Ads 04 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8236758/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2021.04.012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithbarbaraa ratesofclostridioidesdifficileatanurbanhospitalduringinitialcovidpandemicwave AT kimkilyoub ratesofclostridioidesdifficileatanurbanhospitalduringinitialcovidpandemicwave AT yassinarsheena ratesofclostridioidesdifficileatanurbanhospitalduringinitialcovidpandemicwave AT caminsbernard ratesofclostridioidesdifficileatanurbanhospitalduringinitialcovidpandemicwave AT gottlieblindsey ratesofclostridioidesdifficileatanurbanhospitalduringinitialcovidpandemicwave |