Cargando…

Feasibility and Outcomes of Upgrading to Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy and Infranodal Atrioventricular Block

His bundle pacing (HBP) can reverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling in patients with right ventricular (RV) pacing-induced cardimyopathy (PICM) but may be unable to correct infranodal atrioventricular block (AVB). Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) results in rapid LV activation and may be able to re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ye, Yang, Wu, Shengjie, Su, Lan, Sheng, Xia, Zhang, Jiefang, Wang, Bei, Sharma, Parikshit S., Ellenbogen, Kenneth A., Su, Yangang, Chen, Xueying, Fu, Guosheng, Huang, Weijian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8236829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34195236
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.674452
_version_ 1783714624946831360
author Ye, Yang
Wu, Shengjie
Su, Lan
Sheng, Xia
Zhang, Jiefang
Wang, Bei
Sharma, Parikshit S.
Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
Su, Yangang
Chen, Xueying
Fu, Guosheng
Huang, Weijian
author_facet Ye, Yang
Wu, Shengjie
Su, Lan
Sheng, Xia
Zhang, Jiefang
Wang, Bei
Sharma, Parikshit S.
Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
Su, Yangang
Chen, Xueying
Fu, Guosheng
Huang, Weijian
author_sort Ye, Yang
collection PubMed
description His bundle pacing (HBP) can reverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling in patients with right ventricular (RV) pacing-induced cardimyopathy (PICM) but may be unable to correct infranodal atrioventricular block (AVB). Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) results in rapid LV activation and may be able to reliably pace beyond the site of AVB. Our study was conducted to assess the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of permanent LBBP in infranodal AVB and PICM patients. Patients with infranodal AVB and PICM who underwent LBBP for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) were included. Clinical evaluation and echocardiographic and electrocardiographic assessments were recorded at baseline and follow-up. Permanent LBBP upgrade was successful in 19 of 20 patients with a median follow-up duration of 12 months. QRS duration (QRSd) increased from 139.3 ± 28.0 ms at baseline to 176.2 ± 21.4 ms (P < 0.001) with right ventricular pacing (RVP) and was shortened to 120.9 ± 15.2 ms after LBBP (P < 0.001). The mean LBBP threshold was 0.7 ± 0.3 V at 0.4 ms at implant and remained stable during follow-up. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased from 36.3% ± 6.5% to 51.9% ± 13.0% (P < 0.001) with left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) reduced from 180.1 ± 43.5 to 136.8 ± 36.7 ml (P < 0.001) during last follow-up. LBBP paced beyond the site of block, which results in a low pacing threshold with a high success rate in infranodal AVB patients. LBBP improved LV function with stable parameters over the 12 months, making it a reasonable alternative to cardiac resynchronization pacing via a coronary sinus lead in infranodal AVB and PICM patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8236829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82368292021-06-29 Feasibility and Outcomes of Upgrading to Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy and Infranodal Atrioventricular Block Ye, Yang Wu, Shengjie Su, Lan Sheng, Xia Zhang, Jiefang Wang, Bei Sharma, Parikshit S. Ellenbogen, Kenneth A. Su, Yangang Chen, Xueying Fu, Guosheng Huang, Weijian Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine His bundle pacing (HBP) can reverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling in patients with right ventricular (RV) pacing-induced cardimyopathy (PICM) but may be unable to correct infranodal atrioventricular block (AVB). Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) results in rapid LV activation and may be able to reliably pace beyond the site of AVB. Our study was conducted to assess the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of permanent LBBP in infranodal AVB and PICM patients. Patients with infranodal AVB and PICM who underwent LBBP for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) were included. Clinical evaluation and echocardiographic and electrocardiographic assessments were recorded at baseline and follow-up. Permanent LBBP upgrade was successful in 19 of 20 patients with a median follow-up duration of 12 months. QRS duration (QRSd) increased from 139.3 ± 28.0 ms at baseline to 176.2 ± 21.4 ms (P < 0.001) with right ventricular pacing (RVP) and was shortened to 120.9 ± 15.2 ms after LBBP (P < 0.001). The mean LBBP threshold was 0.7 ± 0.3 V at 0.4 ms at implant and remained stable during follow-up. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased from 36.3% ± 6.5% to 51.9% ± 13.0% (P < 0.001) with left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) reduced from 180.1 ± 43.5 to 136.8 ± 36.7 ml (P < 0.001) during last follow-up. LBBP paced beyond the site of block, which results in a low pacing threshold with a high success rate in infranodal AVB patients. LBBP improved LV function with stable parameters over the 12 months, making it a reasonable alternative to cardiac resynchronization pacing via a coronary sinus lead in infranodal AVB and PICM patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8236829/ /pubmed/34195236 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.674452 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ye, Wu, Su, Sheng, Zhang, Wang, Sharma, Ellenbogen, Su, Chen, Fu and Huang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Ye, Yang
Wu, Shengjie
Su, Lan
Sheng, Xia
Zhang, Jiefang
Wang, Bei
Sharma, Parikshit S.
Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
Su, Yangang
Chen, Xueying
Fu, Guosheng
Huang, Weijian
Feasibility and Outcomes of Upgrading to Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy and Infranodal Atrioventricular Block
title Feasibility and Outcomes of Upgrading to Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy and Infranodal Atrioventricular Block
title_full Feasibility and Outcomes of Upgrading to Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy and Infranodal Atrioventricular Block
title_fullStr Feasibility and Outcomes of Upgrading to Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy and Infranodal Atrioventricular Block
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and Outcomes of Upgrading to Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy and Infranodal Atrioventricular Block
title_short Feasibility and Outcomes of Upgrading to Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy and Infranodal Atrioventricular Block
title_sort feasibility and outcomes of upgrading to left bundle branch pacing in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy and infranodal atrioventricular block
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8236829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34195236
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.674452
work_keys_str_mv AT yeyang feasibilityandoutcomesofupgradingtoleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyandinfranodalatrioventricularblock
AT wushengjie feasibilityandoutcomesofupgradingtoleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyandinfranodalatrioventricularblock
AT sulan feasibilityandoutcomesofupgradingtoleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyandinfranodalatrioventricularblock
AT shengxia feasibilityandoutcomesofupgradingtoleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyandinfranodalatrioventricularblock
AT zhangjiefang feasibilityandoutcomesofupgradingtoleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyandinfranodalatrioventricularblock
AT wangbei feasibilityandoutcomesofupgradingtoleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyandinfranodalatrioventricularblock
AT sharmaparikshits feasibilityandoutcomesofupgradingtoleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyandinfranodalatrioventricularblock
AT ellenbogenkennetha feasibilityandoutcomesofupgradingtoleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyandinfranodalatrioventricularblock
AT suyangang feasibilityandoutcomesofupgradingtoleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyandinfranodalatrioventricularblock
AT chenxueying feasibilityandoutcomesofupgradingtoleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyandinfranodalatrioventricularblock
AT fuguosheng feasibilityandoutcomesofupgradingtoleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyandinfranodalatrioventricularblock
AT huangweijian feasibilityandoutcomesofupgradingtoleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyandinfranodalatrioventricularblock