Cargando…
Mammographic density and prognosis in primary breast cancer patients
PURPOSE: Mammographic density (MD) is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer (BC). However, the influence of MD on the BC prognosis is unclear. The objective of this study was therefore to investigate whether percentage MD (PMD) is associated with a difference in disease-free or overall...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8237359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34157655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2021.06.004 |
_version_ | 1783714713463422976 |
---|---|
author | Heindl, Felix Fasching, Peter A. Hein, Alexander Hack, Carolin C. Heusinger, Katharina Gass, Paul Pöschke, Patrik Stübs, Frederik A. Schulz-Wendtland, Rüdiger Hartmann, Arndt Erber, Ramona Beckmann, Matthias W. Meyer, Julia Häberle, Lothar Jud, Sebastian M. Emons, Julius |
author_facet | Heindl, Felix Fasching, Peter A. Hein, Alexander Hack, Carolin C. Heusinger, Katharina Gass, Paul Pöschke, Patrik Stübs, Frederik A. Schulz-Wendtland, Rüdiger Hartmann, Arndt Erber, Ramona Beckmann, Matthias W. Meyer, Julia Häberle, Lothar Jud, Sebastian M. Emons, Julius |
author_sort | Heindl, Felix |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Mammographic density (MD) is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer (BC). However, the influence of MD on the BC prognosis is unclear. The objective of this study was therefore to investigate whether percentage MD (PMD) is associated with a difference in disease-free or overall survival in primary BC patients. METHODS: A total of 2525 patients with primary, metastasis-free BC were followed up retrospectively for this analysis. For all patients, PMD was evaluated by two readers using a semi-automated method. The association between PMD and prognosis was evaluated using Cox regression models with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) as the outcome, and the following adjustments: age at diagnosis, year of diagnosis, body mass index, tumor stage, grading, lymph node status, hormone receptor and HER2 status. RESULTS: After median observation periods of 9.5 and 10.0 years, no influence of PMD on DFS (p = 0.46, likelihood ratio test (LRT)) or OS (p = 0.22, LRT), respectively, was found. In the initial unadjusted analysis higher PMD was associated with longer DFS and OS. The effect of PMD on DFS and OS disappeared after adjustment for age and was caused by the underlying age effect. CONCLUSIONS: Although MD is one of the strongest independent risk factors for BC, in our collective PMD is not associated with disease-free and overall survival in patients with BC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8237359 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82373592021-06-29 Mammographic density and prognosis in primary breast cancer patients Heindl, Felix Fasching, Peter A. Hein, Alexander Hack, Carolin C. Heusinger, Katharina Gass, Paul Pöschke, Patrik Stübs, Frederik A. Schulz-Wendtland, Rüdiger Hartmann, Arndt Erber, Ramona Beckmann, Matthias W. Meyer, Julia Häberle, Lothar Jud, Sebastian M. Emons, Julius Breast Original Article PURPOSE: Mammographic density (MD) is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer (BC). However, the influence of MD on the BC prognosis is unclear. The objective of this study was therefore to investigate whether percentage MD (PMD) is associated with a difference in disease-free or overall survival in primary BC patients. METHODS: A total of 2525 patients with primary, metastasis-free BC were followed up retrospectively for this analysis. For all patients, PMD was evaluated by two readers using a semi-automated method. The association between PMD and prognosis was evaluated using Cox regression models with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) as the outcome, and the following adjustments: age at diagnosis, year of diagnosis, body mass index, tumor stage, grading, lymph node status, hormone receptor and HER2 status. RESULTS: After median observation periods of 9.5 and 10.0 years, no influence of PMD on DFS (p = 0.46, likelihood ratio test (LRT)) or OS (p = 0.22, LRT), respectively, was found. In the initial unadjusted analysis higher PMD was associated with longer DFS and OS. The effect of PMD on DFS and OS disappeared after adjustment for age and was caused by the underlying age effect. CONCLUSIONS: Although MD is one of the strongest independent risk factors for BC, in our collective PMD is not associated with disease-free and overall survival in patients with BC. Elsevier 2021-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8237359/ /pubmed/34157655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2021.06.004 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Heindl, Felix Fasching, Peter A. Hein, Alexander Hack, Carolin C. Heusinger, Katharina Gass, Paul Pöschke, Patrik Stübs, Frederik A. Schulz-Wendtland, Rüdiger Hartmann, Arndt Erber, Ramona Beckmann, Matthias W. Meyer, Julia Häberle, Lothar Jud, Sebastian M. Emons, Julius Mammographic density and prognosis in primary breast cancer patients |
title | Mammographic density and prognosis in primary breast cancer patients |
title_full | Mammographic density and prognosis in primary breast cancer patients |
title_fullStr | Mammographic density and prognosis in primary breast cancer patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Mammographic density and prognosis in primary breast cancer patients |
title_short | Mammographic density and prognosis in primary breast cancer patients |
title_sort | mammographic density and prognosis in primary breast cancer patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8237359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34157655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2021.06.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heindlfelix mammographicdensityandprognosisinprimarybreastcancerpatients AT faschingpetera mammographicdensityandprognosisinprimarybreastcancerpatients AT heinalexander mammographicdensityandprognosisinprimarybreastcancerpatients AT hackcarolinc mammographicdensityandprognosisinprimarybreastcancerpatients AT heusingerkatharina mammographicdensityandprognosisinprimarybreastcancerpatients AT gasspaul mammographicdensityandprognosisinprimarybreastcancerpatients AT poschkepatrik mammographicdensityandprognosisinprimarybreastcancerpatients AT stubsfrederika mammographicdensityandprognosisinprimarybreastcancerpatients AT schulzwendtlandrudiger mammographicdensityandprognosisinprimarybreastcancerpatients AT hartmannarndt mammographicdensityandprognosisinprimarybreastcancerpatients AT erberramona mammographicdensityandprognosisinprimarybreastcancerpatients AT beckmannmatthiasw mammographicdensityandprognosisinprimarybreastcancerpatients AT meyerjulia mammographicdensityandprognosisinprimarybreastcancerpatients AT haberlelothar mammographicdensityandprognosisinprimarybreastcancerpatients AT judsebastianm mammographicdensityandprognosisinprimarybreastcancerpatients AT emonsjulius mammographicdensityandprognosisinprimarybreastcancerpatients |