Cargando…

A Comparison of Candida Detection in Sputum by the Conventional Culture and Fluorescent Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods

BACKGROUND: Candida is a pathogenic fungus. In recent years, the increase in immunosuppressive diseases has led to an increase in Candida infections, with the lungs being the most common site. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the positive detection rates of Candida in sputum samples b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Xiaoqun, Lv, Huoyang, Zhang, Fengwei, Zhu, Houyong, Cai, Long
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8237698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34158468
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.930293
_version_ 1783714769239277568
author Xu, Xiaoqun
Lv, Huoyang
Zhang, Fengwei
Zhu, Houyong
Cai, Long
author_facet Xu, Xiaoqun
Lv, Huoyang
Zhang, Fengwei
Zhu, Houyong
Cai, Long
author_sort Xu, Xiaoqun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Candida is a pathogenic fungus. In recent years, the increase in immunosuppressive diseases has led to an increase in Candida infections, with the lungs being the most common site. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the positive detection rates of Candida in sputum samples by Candida culture and fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and to explore a new method for rapid, accurate, and effective detection of Candida in sputum, providing swift evidence of clinical fungal infection. MATERIAL/METHODS: From October 2016 to March 2017, 300 sputum samples were collected and detected by the conventional culture method and fluorescent PCR method. The positive rate of Candida detection was compared between the 2 methods. RESULTS: In the 300 sputum samples, the positive detection rate of Candida was 50% by the culture method and 65.67% by the fluorescent PCR method (P<0.001). Therefore, the positive detection rate of Candida was higher by the fluorescent PCR method. CONCLUSIONS: The conventional culture method for Candida needs a longer duration (24 h to 48 h) and the positive detection rate is low. However, it takes only 3 h to detect Candida in sputum by the fluorescent PCR method, the positive detection rate is high, and can be used as a screening method for Candida in sputum samples. Additional large-scale clinical trials need to be completed to assess the correlation between fluorescent PCR and pulmonary Candida infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8237698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82376982021-07-09 A Comparison of Candida Detection in Sputum by the Conventional Culture and Fluorescent Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods Xu, Xiaoqun Lv, Huoyang Zhang, Fengwei Zhu, Houyong Cai, Long Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Candida is a pathogenic fungus. In recent years, the increase in immunosuppressive diseases has led to an increase in Candida infections, with the lungs being the most common site. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the positive detection rates of Candida in sputum samples by Candida culture and fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and to explore a new method for rapid, accurate, and effective detection of Candida in sputum, providing swift evidence of clinical fungal infection. MATERIAL/METHODS: From October 2016 to March 2017, 300 sputum samples were collected and detected by the conventional culture method and fluorescent PCR method. The positive rate of Candida detection was compared between the 2 methods. RESULTS: In the 300 sputum samples, the positive detection rate of Candida was 50% by the culture method and 65.67% by the fluorescent PCR method (P<0.001). Therefore, the positive detection rate of Candida was higher by the fluorescent PCR method. CONCLUSIONS: The conventional culture method for Candida needs a longer duration (24 h to 48 h) and the positive detection rate is low. However, it takes only 3 h to detect Candida in sputum by the fluorescent PCR method, the positive detection rate is high, and can be used as a screening method for Candida in sputum samples. Additional large-scale clinical trials need to be completed to assess the correlation between fluorescent PCR and pulmonary Candida infection. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2021-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8237698/ /pubmed/34158468 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.930293 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Xu, Xiaoqun
Lv, Huoyang
Zhang, Fengwei
Zhu, Houyong
Cai, Long
A Comparison of Candida Detection in Sputum by the Conventional Culture and Fluorescent Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods
title A Comparison of Candida Detection in Sputum by the Conventional Culture and Fluorescent Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods
title_full A Comparison of Candida Detection in Sputum by the Conventional Culture and Fluorescent Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods
title_fullStr A Comparison of Candida Detection in Sputum by the Conventional Culture and Fluorescent Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Candida Detection in Sputum by the Conventional Culture and Fluorescent Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods
title_short A Comparison of Candida Detection in Sputum by the Conventional Culture and Fluorescent Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods
title_sort comparison of candida detection in sputum by the conventional culture and fluorescent polymerase chain reaction methods
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8237698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34158468
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.930293
work_keys_str_mv AT xuxiaoqun acomparisonofcandidadetectioninsputumbytheconventionalcultureandfluorescentpolymerasechainreactionmethods
AT lvhuoyang acomparisonofcandidadetectioninsputumbytheconventionalcultureandfluorescentpolymerasechainreactionmethods
AT zhangfengwei acomparisonofcandidadetectioninsputumbytheconventionalcultureandfluorescentpolymerasechainreactionmethods
AT zhuhouyong acomparisonofcandidadetectioninsputumbytheconventionalcultureandfluorescentpolymerasechainreactionmethods
AT cailong acomparisonofcandidadetectioninsputumbytheconventionalcultureandfluorescentpolymerasechainreactionmethods
AT xuxiaoqun comparisonofcandidadetectioninsputumbytheconventionalcultureandfluorescentpolymerasechainreactionmethods
AT lvhuoyang comparisonofcandidadetectioninsputumbytheconventionalcultureandfluorescentpolymerasechainreactionmethods
AT zhangfengwei comparisonofcandidadetectioninsputumbytheconventionalcultureandfluorescentpolymerasechainreactionmethods
AT zhuhouyong comparisonofcandidadetectioninsputumbytheconventionalcultureandfluorescentpolymerasechainreactionmethods
AT cailong comparisonofcandidadetectioninsputumbytheconventionalcultureandfluorescentpolymerasechainreactionmethods