Cargando…
Qualitative evaluation of primary care providers’ experiences caring for frequent users of the emergency department
OBJECTIVES: Many interventions have been developed over the years to offer frequent users of the emergency department (FUEDs) better access to quality coordinated healthcare. Despite recognising the role primary care physicians (PCPs) play in FUEDs’ care, to date their perceptions of case management...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8237725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34172545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044326 |
_version_ | 1783714773119008768 |
---|---|
author | Brunner, Laureline Canepa Allen, Marina Malebranche, Mary Hudon, Catherine Senn, Nicolas Hugli, Olivier Vu, Francis Akré, Christina Bodenmann, Patrick |
author_facet | Brunner, Laureline Canepa Allen, Marina Malebranche, Mary Hudon, Catherine Senn, Nicolas Hugli, Olivier Vu, Francis Akré, Christina Bodenmann, Patrick |
author_sort | Brunner, Laureline |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Many interventions have been developed over the years to offer frequent users of the emergency department (FUEDs) better access to quality coordinated healthcare. Despite recognising the role primary care physicians (PCPs) play in FUEDs’ care, to date their perceptions of case management, the most studied intervention, have rarely been assessed. Furthermore, a gap regarding PCPs’ experience of caring for FUEDs persists. Thus, this study aimed to explore PCPs’ perceptions of the care provided to FUEDs in emergency and primary care settings, their views on the local case management team (CMT), and their suggestions to improve FUEDs’ care. DESIGN: Qualitative study using in-depth semistructured interviews and inductive thematic analysis. SETTING: Canton of Vaud, Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty PCPs participated, 16 in private practice (PP-PCPs) and 14 based at the Lausanne University Centre of General Medicine and Public Health (Unisanté—U-PCPs). RESULTS: U-PCPs and PP-PCPs thought that most FUEDs’ emergency department (ED) visits were legitimate, but questioned ED adequacy to meet FUEDs’ needs. Yet, both PCP groups reported encountering many challenges in FUEDs’ care themselves. In this context, PP-PCPs seemed more satisfied of the care they provided to FUEDs than U-PCPs. Generally, U-PCPs seemed to find more value in the CMT to help them care for FUEDs than PP-PCPs. To enhance FUEDs’ care, U-PCPs and PP-PCPs suggested enhancing collaboration with other healthcare providers. U-PCPs also wished to increase their availability, and some PP-PCPs considered outpatient clinics, larger group practices or medical centres most appropriate to handle FUEDs’ needs. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the many challenges PCPs face in caring for FUEDs, that a CM intervention has the potential to mitigate, and provides ways forward in improving FUEDs’ care, including reinforced communication with the CMT and ED physicians, and structural changes to their own way of delivering care to FUEDs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8237725 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82377252021-07-09 Qualitative evaluation of primary care providers’ experiences caring for frequent users of the emergency department Brunner, Laureline Canepa Allen, Marina Malebranche, Mary Hudon, Catherine Senn, Nicolas Hugli, Olivier Vu, Francis Akré, Christina Bodenmann, Patrick BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: Many interventions have been developed over the years to offer frequent users of the emergency department (FUEDs) better access to quality coordinated healthcare. Despite recognising the role primary care physicians (PCPs) play in FUEDs’ care, to date their perceptions of case management, the most studied intervention, have rarely been assessed. Furthermore, a gap regarding PCPs’ experience of caring for FUEDs persists. Thus, this study aimed to explore PCPs’ perceptions of the care provided to FUEDs in emergency and primary care settings, their views on the local case management team (CMT), and their suggestions to improve FUEDs’ care. DESIGN: Qualitative study using in-depth semistructured interviews and inductive thematic analysis. SETTING: Canton of Vaud, Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty PCPs participated, 16 in private practice (PP-PCPs) and 14 based at the Lausanne University Centre of General Medicine and Public Health (Unisanté—U-PCPs). RESULTS: U-PCPs and PP-PCPs thought that most FUEDs’ emergency department (ED) visits were legitimate, but questioned ED adequacy to meet FUEDs’ needs. Yet, both PCP groups reported encountering many challenges in FUEDs’ care themselves. In this context, PP-PCPs seemed more satisfied of the care they provided to FUEDs than U-PCPs. Generally, U-PCPs seemed to find more value in the CMT to help them care for FUEDs than PP-PCPs. To enhance FUEDs’ care, U-PCPs and PP-PCPs suggested enhancing collaboration with other healthcare providers. U-PCPs also wished to increase their availability, and some PP-PCPs considered outpatient clinics, larger group practices or medical centres most appropriate to handle FUEDs’ needs. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the many challenges PCPs face in caring for FUEDs, that a CM intervention has the potential to mitigate, and provides ways forward in improving FUEDs’ care, including reinforced communication with the CMT and ED physicians, and structural changes to their own way of delivering care to FUEDs. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8237725/ /pubmed/34172545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044326 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Brunner, Laureline Canepa Allen, Marina Malebranche, Mary Hudon, Catherine Senn, Nicolas Hugli, Olivier Vu, Francis Akré, Christina Bodenmann, Patrick Qualitative evaluation of primary care providers’ experiences caring for frequent users of the emergency department |
title | Qualitative evaluation of primary care providers’ experiences caring for frequent users of the emergency department |
title_full | Qualitative evaluation of primary care providers’ experiences caring for frequent users of the emergency department |
title_fullStr | Qualitative evaluation of primary care providers’ experiences caring for frequent users of the emergency department |
title_full_unstemmed | Qualitative evaluation of primary care providers’ experiences caring for frequent users of the emergency department |
title_short | Qualitative evaluation of primary care providers’ experiences caring for frequent users of the emergency department |
title_sort | qualitative evaluation of primary care providers’ experiences caring for frequent users of the emergency department |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8237725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34172545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044326 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brunnerlaureline qualitativeevaluationofprimarycareprovidersexperiencescaringforfrequentusersoftheemergencydepartment AT canepaallenmarina qualitativeevaluationofprimarycareprovidersexperiencescaringforfrequentusersoftheemergencydepartment AT malebranchemary qualitativeevaluationofprimarycareprovidersexperiencescaringforfrequentusersoftheemergencydepartment AT hudoncatherine qualitativeevaluationofprimarycareprovidersexperiencescaringforfrequentusersoftheemergencydepartment AT sennnicolas qualitativeevaluationofprimarycareprovidersexperiencescaringforfrequentusersoftheemergencydepartment AT hugliolivier qualitativeevaluationofprimarycareprovidersexperiencescaringforfrequentusersoftheemergencydepartment AT vufrancis qualitativeevaluationofprimarycareprovidersexperiencescaringforfrequentusersoftheemergencydepartment AT akrechristina qualitativeevaluationofprimarycareprovidersexperiencescaringforfrequentusersoftheemergencydepartment AT bodenmannpatrick qualitativeevaluationofprimarycareprovidersexperiencescaringforfrequentusersoftheemergencydepartment |