Cargando…

Improving access to primary care: a mixed-methods approach studying a new review appointment system in a Scottish GP practice

A Scottish general practitioner (GP) practice proposed an improvement intervention, shorter pre-bookable ‘review’ appointments, to increase appointment capacity and meet their patients’ demand for appointments. Staff are now able to pre-book these review appointments for patients, guaranteeing that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slater, Jay, Malik, Salahuddin, Davey, Peter, Grant, Suzanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8237728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34172510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001279
_version_ 1783714773847769088
author Slater, Jay
Malik, Salahuddin
Davey, Peter
Grant, Suzanne
author_facet Slater, Jay
Malik, Salahuddin
Davey, Peter
Grant, Suzanne
author_sort Slater, Jay
collection PubMed
description A Scottish general practitioner (GP) practice proposed an improvement intervention, shorter pre-bookable ‘review’ appointments, to increase appointment capacity and meet their patients’ demand for appointments. Staff are now able to pre-book these review appointments for patients, guaranteeing that the patient will see the same GP or advanced nurse practitioner (ANP) for both initial and review appointments. By shortening the review appointments, more patients were seen each day, hence the appointment capacity increased. The aim of this project was to examine the impact of the improvement intervention, pre-bookable review appointments, using a mixed-methods approach. Ethnographic methods (non-participant observation, participant observation and eight semistructured interviews with administrative staff) provided qualitative data, to understand the appointment system and to identify areas for further improvement. Quantitative data were then collected to assess: the number of patients receiving ‘on the day’ appointments, with the aim for this to be 95% (outcome measure); by how much the number of appointments available had increased (process measure) and the administrative staff workload (balancing measure). During a 7-week period, 3 months post-intervention, a median of 93% of patients received an ‘on the day’ appointment when they phoned for one between 08:00 and 09:00. The number of appointments available increased by 43%. Administrative staff workload (number of calls received per day) remained the same. Patients prefer being able to book in to see the same GP (continuity of care) and the ability to book in advance. Administrative staff workload decreased in terms of dealing with less frustrated patients. Main suggestions for improvement include introducing later appointments for workers and text reminders for pre-booked (review and online) appointments. The introduction of pre-bookable review appointments improved patient accessibility in the practice. Next steps for improving the appointment system include gaining clinician (GP/ANP) opinions on review appointments and trialling later appointments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8237728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82377282021-07-09 Improving access to primary care: a mixed-methods approach studying a new review appointment system in a Scottish GP practice Slater, Jay Malik, Salahuddin Davey, Peter Grant, Suzanne BMJ Open Qual Quality Improvement Report A Scottish general practitioner (GP) practice proposed an improvement intervention, shorter pre-bookable ‘review’ appointments, to increase appointment capacity and meet their patients’ demand for appointments. Staff are now able to pre-book these review appointments for patients, guaranteeing that the patient will see the same GP or advanced nurse practitioner (ANP) for both initial and review appointments. By shortening the review appointments, more patients were seen each day, hence the appointment capacity increased. The aim of this project was to examine the impact of the improvement intervention, pre-bookable review appointments, using a mixed-methods approach. Ethnographic methods (non-participant observation, participant observation and eight semistructured interviews with administrative staff) provided qualitative data, to understand the appointment system and to identify areas for further improvement. Quantitative data were then collected to assess: the number of patients receiving ‘on the day’ appointments, with the aim for this to be 95% (outcome measure); by how much the number of appointments available had increased (process measure) and the administrative staff workload (balancing measure). During a 7-week period, 3 months post-intervention, a median of 93% of patients received an ‘on the day’ appointment when they phoned for one between 08:00 and 09:00. The number of appointments available increased by 43%. Administrative staff workload (number of calls received per day) remained the same. Patients prefer being able to book in to see the same GP (continuity of care) and the ability to book in advance. Administrative staff workload decreased in terms of dealing with less frustrated patients. Main suggestions for improvement include introducing later appointments for workers and text reminders for pre-booked (review and online) appointments. The introduction of pre-bookable review appointments improved patient accessibility in the practice. Next steps for improving the appointment system include gaining clinician (GP/ANP) opinions on review appointments and trialling later appointments. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8237728/ /pubmed/34172510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001279 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Quality Improvement Report
Slater, Jay
Malik, Salahuddin
Davey, Peter
Grant, Suzanne
Improving access to primary care: a mixed-methods approach studying a new review appointment system in a Scottish GP practice
title Improving access to primary care: a mixed-methods approach studying a new review appointment system in a Scottish GP practice
title_full Improving access to primary care: a mixed-methods approach studying a new review appointment system in a Scottish GP practice
title_fullStr Improving access to primary care: a mixed-methods approach studying a new review appointment system in a Scottish GP practice
title_full_unstemmed Improving access to primary care: a mixed-methods approach studying a new review appointment system in a Scottish GP practice
title_short Improving access to primary care: a mixed-methods approach studying a new review appointment system in a Scottish GP practice
title_sort improving access to primary care: a mixed-methods approach studying a new review appointment system in a scottish gp practice
topic Quality Improvement Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8237728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34172510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001279
work_keys_str_mv AT slaterjay improvingaccesstoprimarycareamixedmethodsapproachstudyinganewreviewappointmentsysteminascottishgppractice
AT maliksalahuddin improvingaccesstoprimarycareamixedmethodsapproachstudyinganewreviewappointmentsysteminascottishgppractice
AT daveypeter improvingaccesstoprimarycareamixedmethodsapproachstudyinganewreviewappointmentsysteminascottishgppractice
AT grantsuzanne improvingaccesstoprimarycareamixedmethodsapproachstudyinganewreviewappointmentsysteminascottishgppractice