Cargando…
Improving access to primary care: a mixed-methods approach studying a new review appointment system in a Scottish GP practice
A Scottish general practitioner (GP) practice proposed an improvement intervention, shorter pre-bookable ‘review’ appointments, to increase appointment capacity and meet their patients’ demand for appointments. Staff are now able to pre-book these review appointments for patients, guaranteeing that...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8237728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34172510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001279 |
_version_ | 1783714773847769088 |
---|---|
author | Slater, Jay Malik, Salahuddin Davey, Peter Grant, Suzanne |
author_facet | Slater, Jay Malik, Salahuddin Davey, Peter Grant, Suzanne |
author_sort | Slater, Jay |
collection | PubMed |
description | A Scottish general practitioner (GP) practice proposed an improvement intervention, shorter pre-bookable ‘review’ appointments, to increase appointment capacity and meet their patients’ demand for appointments. Staff are now able to pre-book these review appointments for patients, guaranteeing that the patient will see the same GP or advanced nurse practitioner (ANP) for both initial and review appointments. By shortening the review appointments, more patients were seen each day, hence the appointment capacity increased. The aim of this project was to examine the impact of the improvement intervention, pre-bookable review appointments, using a mixed-methods approach. Ethnographic methods (non-participant observation, participant observation and eight semistructured interviews with administrative staff) provided qualitative data, to understand the appointment system and to identify areas for further improvement. Quantitative data were then collected to assess: the number of patients receiving ‘on the day’ appointments, with the aim for this to be 95% (outcome measure); by how much the number of appointments available had increased (process measure) and the administrative staff workload (balancing measure). During a 7-week period, 3 months post-intervention, a median of 93% of patients received an ‘on the day’ appointment when they phoned for one between 08:00 and 09:00. The number of appointments available increased by 43%. Administrative staff workload (number of calls received per day) remained the same. Patients prefer being able to book in to see the same GP (continuity of care) and the ability to book in advance. Administrative staff workload decreased in terms of dealing with less frustrated patients. Main suggestions for improvement include introducing later appointments for workers and text reminders for pre-booked (review and online) appointments. The introduction of pre-bookable review appointments improved patient accessibility in the practice. Next steps for improving the appointment system include gaining clinician (GP/ANP) opinions on review appointments and trialling later appointments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8237728 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82377282021-07-09 Improving access to primary care: a mixed-methods approach studying a new review appointment system in a Scottish GP practice Slater, Jay Malik, Salahuddin Davey, Peter Grant, Suzanne BMJ Open Qual Quality Improvement Report A Scottish general practitioner (GP) practice proposed an improvement intervention, shorter pre-bookable ‘review’ appointments, to increase appointment capacity and meet their patients’ demand for appointments. Staff are now able to pre-book these review appointments for patients, guaranteeing that the patient will see the same GP or advanced nurse practitioner (ANP) for both initial and review appointments. By shortening the review appointments, more patients were seen each day, hence the appointment capacity increased. The aim of this project was to examine the impact of the improvement intervention, pre-bookable review appointments, using a mixed-methods approach. Ethnographic methods (non-participant observation, participant observation and eight semistructured interviews with administrative staff) provided qualitative data, to understand the appointment system and to identify areas for further improvement. Quantitative data were then collected to assess: the number of patients receiving ‘on the day’ appointments, with the aim for this to be 95% (outcome measure); by how much the number of appointments available had increased (process measure) and the administrative staff workload (balancing measure). During a 7-week period, 3 months post-intervention, a median of 93% of patients received an ‘on the day’ appointment when they phoned for one between 08:00 and 09:00. The number of appointments available increased by 43%. Administrative staff workload (number of calls received per day) remained the same. Patients prefer being able to book in to see the same GP (continuity of care) and the ability to book in advance. Administrative staff workload decreased in terms of dealing with less frustrated patients. Main suggestions for improvement include introducing later appointments for workers and text reminders for pre-booked (review and online) appointments. The introduction of pre-bookable review appointments improved patient accessibility in the practice. Next steps for improving the appointment system include gaining clinician (GP/ANP) opinions on review appointments and trialling later appointments. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8237728/ /pubmed/34172510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001279 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Quality Improvement Report Slater, Jay Malik, Salahuddin Davey, Peter Grant, Suzanne Improving access to primary care: a mixed-methods approach studying a new review appointment system in a Scottish GP practice |
title | Improving access to primary care: a mixed-methods approach studying a new review appointment system in a Scottish GP practice |
title_full | Improving access to primary care: a mixed-methods approach studying a new review appointment system in a Scottish GP practice |
title_fullStr | Improving access to primary care: a mixed-methods approach studying a new review appointment system in a Scottish GP practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving access to primary care: a mixed-methods approach studying a new review appointment system in a Scottish GP practice |
title_short | Improving access to primary care: a mixed-methods approach studying a new review appointment system in a Scottish GP practice |
title_sort | improving access to primary care: a mixed-methods approach studying a new review appointment system in a scottish gp practice |
topic | Quality Improvement Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8237728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34172510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001279 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT slaterjay improvingaccesstoprimarycareamixedmethodsapproachstudyinganewreviewappointmentsysteminascottishgppractice AT maliksalahuddin improvingaccesstoprimarycareamixedmethodsapproachstudyinganewreviewappointmentsysteminascottishgppractice AT daveypeter improvingaccesstoprimarycareamixedmethodsapproachstudyinganewreviewappointmentsysteminascottishgppractice AT grantsuzanne improvingaccesstoprimarycareamixedmethodsapproachstudyinganewreviewappointmentsysteminascottishgppractice |