Cargando…
Meta-analysis of patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy for prevention of recurrent ischemic neurological events: Impact of medication type
BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment strategy for patent foramen ovale (PFO) patients with cryptic stroke remains controversial. We performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of PFO closure versus different types of medical therapy. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8238362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34160457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026473 |
_version_ | 1783714889564422144 |
---|---|
author | Pan, Xuemei Xu, Liang Zhou, Chang Zhang, Zhi Sun, Heng |
author_facet | Pan, Xuemei Xu, Liang Zhou, Chang Zhang, Zhi Sun, Heng |
author_sort | Pan, Xuemei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment strategy for patent foramen ovale (PFO) patients with cryptic stroke remains controversial. We performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of PFO closure versus different types of medical therapy. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The primary efficacy endpoints were the composite outcome of recurrent stroke and/or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Secondary efficacy endpoints included separate stroke and TIA. Safety endpoints included new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter and bleeding. RESULTS: Compared with antiplatelet therapy, PFO closure significantly reduced the risk of composite outcome (odds ratio [OR] 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27–0.51), stroke (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.13–0.36], and TIA (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.34–0.98); Compared with the mixed medical therapy group (consist of antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulant therapy, or both), PFO closure still showed some benefits, but the effect was not as significant as that of antiplatelet therapy (composite outcome: OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.41–0.69; stroke: OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.34–0.68; TIA: OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50–0.96); Compared with anticoagulant therapy, PFO closure showed no benefit (composite outcome: OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.46–1.28; stroke: OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.28–1.25; TIA: OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.50–2.04). In terms of safe endpoints, compared with antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulant therapy, PFO closure increased the risk of AF/atrial flutter (OR 9.56, 95% CI 2.85–32.06; OR 18.96, 95% CI 1.11–323.8, respectively) and reduced the risk of bleeding (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.24–1.05; OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.04–0.46, respectively); compared with mixed medical therapy, PFO closure increased the risk of AF/atrial flutter (OR 4.40,95% CI 2.24–8.67), but there was no difference in bleeding (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.56–1.68). CONCLUSIONS: With the addition of anticoagulants, the benefit of PFO closure decreased gradually. Patient groups that adopt individualized medical therapy strategies may benefit more. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8238362 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82383622021-07-06 Meta-analysis of patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy for prevention of recurrent ischemic neurological events: Impact of medication type Pan, Xuemei Xu, Liang Zhou, Chang Zhang, Zhi Sun, Heng Medicine (Baltimore) 5300 BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment strategy for patent foramen ovale (PFO) patients with cryptic stroke remains controversial. We performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of PFO closure versus different types of medical therapy. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The primary efficacy endpoints were the composite outcome of recurrent stroke and/or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Secondary efficacy endpoints included separate stroke and TIA. Safety endpoints included new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter and bleeding. RESULTS: Compared with antiplatelet therapy, PFO closure significantly reduced the risk of composite outcome (odds ratio [OR] 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27–0.51), stroke (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.13–0.36], and TIA (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.34–0.98); Compared with the mixed medical therapy group (consist of antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulant therapy, or both), PFO closure still showed some benefits, but the effect was not as significant as that of antiplatelet therapy (composite outcome: OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.41–0.69; stroke: OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.34–0.68; TIA: OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50–0.96); Compared with anticoagulant therapy, PFO closure showed no benefit (composite outcome: OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.46–1.28; stroke: OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.28–1.25; TIA: OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.50–2.04). In terms of safe endpoints, compared with antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulant therapy, PFO closure increased the risk of AF/atrial flutter (OR 9.56, 95% CI 2.85–32.06; OR 18.96, 95% CI 1.11–323.8, respectively) and reduced the risk of bleeding (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.24–1.05; OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.04–0.46, respectively); compared with mixed medical therapy, PFO closure increased the risk of AF/atrial flutter (OR 4.40,95% CI 2.24–8.67), but there was no difference in bleeding (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.56–1.68). CONCLUSIONS: With the addition of anticoagulants, the benefit of PFO closure decreased gradually. Patient groups that adopt individualized medical therapy strategies may benefit more. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8238362/ /pubmed/34160457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026473 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | 5300 Pan, Xuemei Xu, Liang Zhou, Chang Zhang, Zhi Sun, Heng Meta-analysis of patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy for prevention of recurrent ischemic neurological events: Impact of medication type |
title | Meta-analysis of patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy for prevention of recurrent ischemic neurological events: Impact of medication type |
title_full | Meta-analysis of patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy for prevention of recurrent ischemic neurological events: Impact of medication type |
title_fullStr | Meta-analysis of patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy for prevention of recurrent ischemic neurological events: Impact of medication type |
title_full_unstemmed | Meta-analysis of patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy for prevention of recurrent ischemic neurological events: Impact of medication type |
title_short | Meta-analysis of patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy for prevention of recurrent ischemic neurological events: Impact of medication type |
title_sort | meta-analysis of patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy for prevention of recurrent ischemic neurological events: impact of medication type |
topic | 5300 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8238362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34160457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026473 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT panxuemei metaanalysisofpatentforamenovaleclosureversusmedicaltherapyforpreventionofrecurrentischemicneurologicaleventsimpactofmedicationtype AT xuliang metaanalysisofpatentforamenovaleclosureversusmedicaltherapyforpreventionofrecurrentischemicneurologicaleventsimpactofmedicationtype AT zhouchang metaanalysisofpatentforamenovaleclosureversusmedicaltherapyforpreventionofrecurrentischemicneurologicaleventsimpactofmedicationtype AT zhangzhi metaanalysisofpatentforamenovaleclosureversusmedicaltherapyforpreventionofrecurrentischemicneurologicaleventsimpactofmedicationtype AT sunheng metaanalysisofpatentforamenovaleclosureversusmedicaltherapyforpreventionofrecurrentischemicneurologicaleventsimpactofmedicationtype |