Cargando…
The Accuracy of Wrist Skin Temperature in Detecting Ovulation Compared to Basal Body Temperature: Prospective Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Study
BACKGROUND: As a daily point measurement, basal body temperature (BBT) might not be able to capture the temperature shift in the menstrual cycle because a single temperature measurement is present on the sliding scale of the circadian rhythm. Wrist skin temperature measured continuously during sleep...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8238491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34100763 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/20710 |
_version_ | 1783714908509044736 |
---|---|
author | Zhu, Tracy Y Rothenbühler, Martina Hamvas, Györgyi Hofmann, Anja Welter, JoEllen Kahr, Maike Kimmich, Nina Shilaih, Mohaned Leeners, Brigitte |
author_facet | Zhu, Tracy Y Rothenbühler, Martina Hamvas, Györgyi Hofmann, Anja Welter, JoEllen Kahr, Maike Kimmich, Nina Shilaih, Mohaned Leeners, Brigitte |
author_sort | Zhu, Tracy Y |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As a daily point measurement, basal body temperature (BBT) might not be able to capture the temperature shift in the menstrual cycle because a single temperature measurement is present on the sliding scale of the circadian rhythm. Wrist skin temperature measured continuously during sleep has the potential to overcome this limitation. OBJECTIVE: This study compares the diagnostic accuracy of these two temperatures for detecting ovulation and to investigate the correlation and agreement between these two temperatures in describing thermal changes in menstrual cycles. METHODS: This prospective study included 193 cycles (170 ovulatory and 23 anovulatory) collected from 57 healthy women. Participants wore a wearable device (Ava Fertility Tracker bracelet 2.0) that continuously measured the wrist skin temperature during sleep. Daily BBT was measured orally and immediately upon waking up using a computerized fertility tracker with a digital thermometer (Lady-Comp). An at-home luteinizing hormone test was used as the reference standard for ovulation. The diagnostic accuracy of using at least one temperature shift detected by the two temperatures in detecting ovulation was evaluated. For ovulatory cycles, repeated measures correlation was used to examine the correlation between the two temperatures, and mixed effect models were used to determine the agreement between the two temperature curves at different menstrual phases. RESULTS: Wrist skin temperature was more sensitive than BBT (sensitivity 0.62 vs 0.23; P<.001) and had a higher true-positive rate (54.9% vs 20.2%) for detecting ovulation; however, it also had a higher false-positive rate (8.8% vs 3.6%), resulting in lower specificity (0.26 vs 0.70; P=.002). The probability that ovulation occurred when at least one temperature shift was detected was 86.2% for wrist skin temperature and 84.8% for BBT. Both temperatures had low negative predictive values (8.8% for wrist skin temperature and 10.9% for BBT). Significant positive correlation between the two temperatures was only found in the follicular phase (rmcorr correlation coefficient=0.294; P=.001). Both temperatures increased during the postovulatory phase with a greater increase in the wrist skin temperature (range of increase: 0.50 °C vs 0.20 °C). During the menstrual phase, the wrist skin temperature exhibited a greater and more rapid decrease (from 36.13 °C to 35.80 °C) than BBT (from 36.31 °C to 36.27 °C). During the preovulatory phase, there were minimal changes in both temperatures and small variations in the estimated daily difference between the two temperatures, indicating an agreement between the two curves. CONCLUSIONS: For women interested in maximizing the chances of pregnancy, wrist skin temperature continuously measured during sleep is more sensitive than BBT for detecting ovulation. The difference in the diagnostic accuracy of these methods was likely attributed to the greater temperature increase in the postovulatory phase and greater temperature decrease during the menstrual phase for the wrist skin temperatures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8238491 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82384912021-07-09 The Accuracy of Wrist Skin Temperature in Detecting Ovulation Compared to Basal Body Temperature: Prospective Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Study Zhu, Tracy Y Rothenbühler, Martina Hamvas, Györgyi Hofmann, Anja Welter, JoEllen Kahr, Maike Kimmich, Nina Shilaih, Mohaned Leeners, Brigitte J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: As a daily point measurement, basal body temperature (BBT) might not be able to capture the temperature shift in the menstrual cycle because a single temperature measurement is present on the sliding scale of the circadian rhythm. Wrist skin temperature measured continuously during sleep has the potential to overcome this limitation. OBJECTIVE: This study compares the diagnostic accuracy of these two temperatures for detecting ovulation and to investigate the correlation and agreement between these two temperatures in describing thermal changes in menstrual cycles. METHODS: This prospective study included 193 cycles (170 ovulatory and 23 anovulatory) collected from 57 healthy women. Participants wore a wearable device (Ava Fertility Tracker bracelet 2.0) that continuously measured the wrist skin temperature during sleep. Daily BBT was measured orally and immediately upon waking up using a computerized fertility tracker with a digital thermometer (Lady-Comp). An at-home luteinizing hormone test was used as the reference standard for ovulation. The diagnostic accuracy of using at least one temperature shift detected by the two temperatures in detecting ovulation was evaluated. For ovulatory cycles, repeated measures correlation was used to examine the correlation between the two temperatures, and mixed effect models were used to determine the agreement between the two temperature curves at different menstrual phases. RESULTS: Wrist skin temperature was more sensitive than BBT (sensitivity 0.62 vs 0.23; P<.001) and had a higher true-positive rate (54.9% vs 20.2%) for detecting ovulation; however, it also had a higher false-positive rate (8.8% vs 3.6%), resulting in lower specificity (0.26 vs 0.70; P=.002). The probability that ovulation occurred when at least one temperature shift was detected was 86.2% for wrist skin temperature and 84.8% for BBT. Both temperatures had low negative predictive values (8.8% for wrist skin temperature and 10.9% for BBT). Significant positive correlation between the two temperatures was only found in the follicular phase (rmcorr correlation coefficient=0.294; P=.001). Both temperatures increased during the postovulatory phase with a greater increase in the wrist skin temperature (range of increase: 0.50 °C vs 0.20 °C). During the menstrual phase, the wrist skin temperature exhibited a greater and more rapid decrease (from 36.13 °C to 35.80 °C) than BBT (from 36.31 °C to 36.27 °C). During the preovulatory phase, there were minimal changes in both temperatures and small variations in the estimated daily difference between the two temperatures, indicating an agreement between the two curves. CONCLUSIONS: For women interested in maximizing the chances of pregnancy, wrist skin temperature continuously measured during sleep is more sensitive than BBT for detecting ovulation. The difference in the diagnostic accuracy of these methods was likely attributed to the greater temperature increase in the postovulatory phase and greater temperature decrease during the menstrual phase for the wrist skin temperatures. JMIR Publications 2021-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8238491/ /pubmed/34100763 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/20710 Text en ©Tracy Y Zhu, Martina Rothenbühler, Györgyi Hamvas, Anja Hofmann, JoEllen Welter, Maike Kahr, Nina Kimmich, Mohaned Shilaih, Brigitte Leeners. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 08.06.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Zhu, Tracy Y Rothenbühler, Martina Hamvas, Györgyi Hofmann, Anja Welter, JoEllen Kahr, Maike Kimmich, Nina Shilaih, Mohaned Leeners, Brigitte The Accuracy of Wrist Skin Temperature in Detecting Ovulation Compared to Basal Body Temperature: Prospective Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Study |
title | The Accuracy of Wrist Skin Temperature in Detecting Ovulation Compared to Basal Body Temperature: Prospective Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Study |
title_full | The Accuracy of Wrist Skin Temperature in Detecting Ovulation Compared to Basal Body Temperature: Prospective Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Study |
title_fullStr | The Accuracy of Wrist Skin Temperature in Detecting Ovulation Compared to Basal Body Temperature: Prospective Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Accuracy of Wrist Skin Temperature in Detecting Ovulation Compared to Basal Body Temperature: Prospective Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Study |
title_short | The Accuracy of Wrist Skin Temperature in Detecting Ovulation Compared to Basal Body Temperature: Prospective Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Study |
title_sort | accuracy of wrist skin temperature in detecting ovulation compared to basal body temperature: prospective comparative diagnostic accuracy study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8238491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34100763 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/20710 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhutracyy theaccuracyofwristskintemperatureindetectingovulationcomparedtobasalbodytemperatureprospectivecomparativediagnosticaccuracystudy AT rothenbuhlermartina theaccuracyofwristskintemperatureindetectingovulationcomparedtobasalbodytemperatureprospectivecomparativediagnosticaccuracystudy AT hamvasgyorgyi theaccuracyofwristskintemperatureindetectingovulationcomparedtobasalbodytemperatureprospectivecomparativediagnosticaccuracystudy AT hofmannanja theaccuracyofwristskintemperatureindetectingovulationcomparedtobasalbodytemperatureprospectivecomparativediagnosticaccuracystudy AT welterjoellen theaccuracyofwristskintemperatureindetectingovulationcomparedtobasalbodytemperatureprospectivecomparativediagnosticaccuracystudy AT kahrmaike theaccuracyofwristskintemperatureindetectingovulationcomparedtobasalbodytemperatureprospectivecomparativediagnosticaccuracystudy AT kimmichnina theaccuracyofwristskintemperatureindetectingovulationcomparedtobasalbodytemperatureprospectivecomparativediagnosticaccuracystudy AT shilaihmohaned theaccuracyofwristskintemperatureindetectingovulationcomparedtobasalbodytemperatureprospectivecomparativediagnosticaccuracystudy AT leenersbrigitte theaccuracyofwristskintemperatureindetectingovulationcomparedtobasalbodytemperatureprospectivecomparativediagnosticaccuracystudy AT zhutracyy accuracyofwristskintemperatureindetectingovulationcomparedtobasalbodytemperatureprospectivecomparativediagnosticaccuracystudy AT rothenbuhlermartina accuracyofwristskintemperatureindetectingovulationcomparedtobasalbodytemperatureprospectivecomparativediagnosticaccuracystudy AT hamvasgyorgyi accuracyofwristskintemperatureindetectingovulationcomparedtobasalbodytemperatureprospectivecomparativediagnosticaccuracystudy AT hofmannanja accuracyofwristskintemperatureindetectingovulationcomparedtobasalbodytemperatureprospectivecomparativediagnosticaccuracystudy AT welterjoellen accuracyofwristskintemperatureindetectingovulationcomparedtobasalbodytemperatureprospectivecomparativediagnosticaccuracystudy AT kahrmaike accuracyofwristskintemperatureindetectingovulationcomparedtobasalbodytemperatureprospectivecomparativediagnosticaccuracystudy AT kimmichnina accuracyofwristskintemperatureindetectingovulationcomparedtobasalbodytemperatureprospectivecomparativediagnosticaccuracystudy AT shilaihmohaned accuracyofwristskintemperatureindetectingovulationcomparedtobasalbodytemperatureprospectivecomparativediagnosticaccuracystudy AT leenersbrigitte accuracyofwristskintemperatureindetectingovulationcomparedtobasalbodytemperatureprospectivecomparativediagnosticaccuracystudy |