Cargando…
Contributions and limitations of using machine learning to predict noise-induced hearing loss
PURPOSE: Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is a global issue that impacts people’s life and health. The current review aims to clarify the contributions and limitations of applying machine learning (ML) to predict NIHL by analyzing the performance of different ML techniques and the procedure of mode...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8238747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33491101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-020-01648-w |
_version_ | 1783714964024852480 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Feifan Cao, Zuwei Grais, Emad M. Zhao, Fei |
author_facet | Chen, Feifan Cao, Zuwei Grais, Emad M. Zhao, Fei |
author_sort | Chen, Feifan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is a global issue that impacts people’s life and health. The current review aims to clarify the contributions and limitations of applying machine learning (ML) to predict NIHL by analyzing the performance of different ML techniques and the procedure of model construction. METHODS: The authors searched PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus on November 26, 2020. RESULTS: Eight studies were recruited in the current review following defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Sample size in the selected studies ranged between 150 and 10,567. The most popular models were artificial neural networks (n = 4), random forests (n = 3) and support vector machines (n = 3). Features mostly correlated with NIHL and used in the models were: age (n = 6), duration of noise exposure (n = 5) and noise exposure level (n = 4). Five included studies used either split-sample validation (n = 3) or ten-fold cross-validation (n = 2). Assessment of accuracy ranged in value from 75.3% to 99% with a low prediction error/root-mean-square error in 3 studies. Only 2 studies measured discrimination risk using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and/or the area under ROC curve. CONCLUSION: In spite of high accuracy and low prediction error of machine learning models, some improvement can be expected from larger sample sizes, multiple algorithm use, completed reports of model construction and the sufficient evaluation of calibration and discrimination risk. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8238747 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82387472021-07-13 Contributions and limitations of using machine learning to predict noise-induced hearing loss Chen, Feifan Cao, Zuwei Grais, Emad M. Zhao, Fei Int Arch Occup Environ Health Review Article PURPOSE: Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is a global issue that impacts people’s life and health. The current review aims to clarify the contributions and limitations of applying machine learning (ML) to predict NIHL by analyzing the performance of different ML techniques and the procedure of model construction. METHODS: The authors searched PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus on November 26, 2020. RESULTS: Eight studies were recruited in the current review following defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Sample size in the selected studies ranged between 150 and 10,567. The most popular models were artificial neural networks (n = 4), random forests (n = 3) and support vector machines (n = 3). Features mostly correlated with NIHL and used in the models were: age (n = 6), duration of noise exposure (n = 5) and noise exposure level (n = 4). Five included studies used either split-sample validation (n = 3) or ten-fold cross-validation (n = 2). Assessment of accuracy ranged in value from 75.3% to 99% with a low prediction error/root-mean-square error in 3 studies. Only 2 studies measured discrimination risk using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and/or the area under ROC curve. CONCLUSION: In spite of high accuracy and low prediction error of machine learning models, some improvement can be expected from larger sample sizes, multiple algorithm use, completed reports of model construction and the sufficient evaluation of calibration and discrimination risk. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-01-25 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8238747/ /pubmed/33491101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-020-01648-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Chen, Feifan Cao, Zuwei Grais, Emad M. Zhao, Fei Contributions and limitations of using machine learning to predict noise-induced hearing loss |
title | Contributions and limitations of using machine learning to predict noise-induced hearing loss |
title_full | Contributions and limitations of using machine learning to predict noise-induced hearing loss |
title_fullStr | Contributions and limitations of using machine learning to predict noise-induced hearing loss |
title_full_unstemmed | Contributions and limitations of using machine learning to predict noise-induced hearing loss |
title_short | Contributions and limitations of using machine learning to predict noise-induced hearing loss |
title_sort | contributions and limitations of using machine learning to predict noise-induced hearing loss |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8238747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33491101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-020-01648-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenfeifan contributionsandlimitationsofusingmachinelearningtopredictnoiseinducedhearingloss AT caozuwei contributionsandlimitationsofusingmachinelearningtopredictnoiseinducedhearingloss AT graisemadm contributionsandlimitationsofusingmachinelearningtopredictnoiseinducedhearingloss AT zhaofei contributionsandlimitationsofusingmachinelearningtopredictnoiseinducedhearingloss |