Cargando…
Composite risk and benefit from adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer
The GIM2 phase III trial demonstrated the benefit of dose-dense chemotherapy in node-positive early breast cancer (eBC). To better define the dose-dense effect in the hormone receptor-positive subgroup, we evaluated its benefit through a composite measure of recurrence risk. We conducted an ancillar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8238951/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34183674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00286-w |
_version_ | 1783714982361300992 |
---|---|
author | Puglisi, Fabio Gerratana, Lorenzo Lambertini, Matteo Ceppi, Marcello Boni, Luca Montemurro, Filippo Russo, Stefania Bighin, Claudia De Laurentiis, Michelino Giuliano, Mario Bisagni, Giancarlo Durando, Antonio Turletti, Anna Garrone, Ornella Ardizzoni, Andrea Gamucci, Teresa Colantuoni, Giuseppe Gravina, Adriano De Placido, Sabino Cognetti, Francesco Del Mastro, Lucia |
author_facet | Puglisi, Fabio Gerratana, Lorenzo Lambertini, Matteo Ceppi, Marcello Boni, Luca Montemurro, Filippo Russo, Stefania Bighin, Claudia De Laurentiis, Michelino Giuliano, Mario Bisagni, Giancarlo Durando, Antonio Turletti, Anna Garrone, Ornella Ardizzoni, Andrea Gamucci, Teresa Colantuoni, Giuseppe Gravina, Adriano De Placido, Sabino Cognetti, Francesco Del Mastro, Lucia |
author_sort | Puglisi, Fabio |
collection | PubMed |
description | The GIM2 phase III trial demonstrated the benefit of dose-dense chemotherapy in node-positive early breast cancer (eBC). To better define the dose-dense effect in the hormone receptor-positive subgroup, we evaluated its benefit through a composite measure of recurrence risk. We conducted an ancillary analysis of the GIM2 trial evaluating the absolute treatment effect through a composite measure of recurrence risk (CPRS) in patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative eBC. CPRS was estimated through Cox proportional hazards models applied to the different clinicopathological features. The treatment effect was compared to the values of CPRS by using the Sub-population Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) process. The Disease-Free Survival (DFS)-oriented STEPP analysis showed distinct patterns of relative treatment effect with respect to CPRS. Overall, 5-year DFS differed across CPRS quartiles ranging from 95.2 to 66.4%. Each CPRS quartile was characterized by a different patients’ composition, especially for age, lymph node involvement, tumor size, estrogen and progesterone receptor expression, and Ki-67. A number needed to treat of 154 and 6 was associated with the lowest and the highest CPRS quartile, respectively. Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy showed a consistent benefit in node-positive eBC patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative disease, but its effect varied according to CPRS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8238951 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82389512021-07-16 Composite risk and benefit from adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer Puglisi, Fabio Gerratana, Lorenzo Lambertini, Matteo Ceppi, Marcello Boni, Luca Montemurro, Filippo Russo, Stefania Bighin, Claudia De Laurentiis, Michelino Giuliano, Mario Bisagni, Giancarlo Durando, Antonio Turletti, Anna Garrone, Ornella Ardizzoni, Andrea Gamucci, Teresa Colantuoni, Giuseppe Gravina, Adriano De Placido, Sabino Cognetti, Francesco Del Mastro, Lucia NPJ Breast Cancer Article The GIM2 phase III trial demonstrated the benefit of dose-dense chemotherapy in node-positive early breast cancer (eBC). To better define the dose-dense effect in the hormone receptor-positive subgroup, we evaluated its benefit through a composite measure of recurrence risk. We conducted an ancillary analysis of the GIM2 trial evaluating the absolute treatment effect through a composite measure of recurrence risk (CPRS) in patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative eBC. CPRS was estimated through Cox proportional hazards models applied to the different clinicopathological features. The treatment effect was compared to the values of CPRS by using the Sub-population Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) process. The Disease-Free Survival (DFS)-oriented STEPP analysis showed distinct patterns of relative treatment effect with respect to CPRS. Overall, 5-year DFS differed across CPRS quartiles ranging from 95.2 to 66.4%. Each CPRS quartile was characterized by a different patients’ composition, especially for age, lymph node involvement, tumor size, estrogen and progesterone receptor expression, and Ki-67. A number needed to treat of 154 and 6 was associated with the lowest and the highest CPRS quartile, respectively. Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy showed a consistent benefit in node-positive eBC patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative disease, but its effect varied according to CPRS. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8238951/ /pubmed/34183674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00286-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Puglisi, Fabio Gerratana, Lorenzo Lambertini, Matteo Ceppi, Marcello Boni, Luca Montemurro, Filippo Russo, Stefania Bighin, Claudia De Laurentiis, Michelino Giuliano, Mario Bisagni, Giancarlo Durando, Antonio Turletti, Anna Garrone, Ornella Ardizzoni, Andrea Gamucci, Teresa Colantuoni, Giuseppe Gravina, Adriano De Placido, Sabino Cognetti, Francesco Del Mastro, Lucia Composite risk and benefit from adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer |
title | Composite risk and benefit from adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer |
title_full | Composite risk and benefit from adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer |
title_fullStr | Composite risk and benefit from adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Composite risk and benefit from adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer |
title_short | Composite risk and benefit from adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer |
title_sort | composite risk and benefit from adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8238951/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34183674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00286-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT puglisifabio compositeriskandbenefitfromadjuvantdosedensechemotherapyinhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancer AT gerratanalorenzo compositeriskandbenefitfromadjuvantdosedensechemotherapyinhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancer AT lambertinimatteo compositeriskandbenefitfromadjuvantdosedensechemotherapyinhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancer AT ceppimarcello compositeriskandbenefitfromadjuvantdosedensechemotherapyinhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancer AT boniluca compositeriskandbenefitfromadjuvantdosedensechemotherapyinhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancer AT montemurrofilippo compositeriskandbenefitfromadjuvantdosedensechemotherapyinhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancer AT russostefania compositeriskandbenefitfromadjuvantdosedensechemotherapyinhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancer AT bighinclaudia compositeriskandbenefitfromadjuvantdosedensechemotherapyinhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancer AT delaurentiismichelino compositeriskandbenefitfromadjuvantdosedensechemotherapyinhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancer AT giulianomario compositeriskandbenefitfromadjuvantdosedensechemotherapyinhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancer AT bisagnigiancarlo compositeriskandbenefitfromadjuvantdosedensechemotherapyinhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancer AT durandoantonio compositeriskandbenefitfromadjuvantdosedensechemotherapyinhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancer AT turlettianna compositeriskandbenefitfromadjuvantdosedensechemotherapyinhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancer AT garroneornella compositeriskandbenefitfromadjuvantdosedensechemotherapyinhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancer AT ardizzoniandrea compositeriskandbenefitfromadjuvantdosedensechemotherapyinhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancer AT gamucciteresa compositeriskandbenefitfromadjuvantdosedensechemotherapyinhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancer AT colantuonigiuseppe compositeriskandbenefitfromadjuvantdosedensechemotherapyinhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancer AT gravinaadriano compositeriskandbenefitfromadjuvantdosedensechemotherapyinhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancer AT deplacidosabino compositeriskandbenefitfromadjuvantdosedensechemotherapyinhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancer AT cognettifrancesco compositeriskandbenefitfromadjuvantdosedensechemotherapyinhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancer AT delmastrolucia compositeriskandbenefitfromadjuvantdosedensechemotherapyinhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancer |