Cargando…

Mucosal Immunization Against Pertussis: Lessons From the Past and Perspectives

BACKGROUND: Current vaccination strategies against pertussis are sub-optimal. Optimal protection against Bordetella pertussis, the causative agent of pertussis, likely requires mucosal immunity. Current pertussis vaccines consist of inactivated whole B. pertussis cells or purified antigens thereof,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dubois, Violaine, Locht, Camille
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8239240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34211481
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.701285
_version_ 1783715038248304640
author Dubois, Violaine
Locht, Camille
author_facet Dubois, Violaine
Locht, Camille
author_sort Dubois, Violaine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current vaccination strategies against pertussis are sub-optimal. Optimal protection against Bordetella pertussis, the causative agent of pertussis, likely requires mucosal immunity. Current pertussis vaccines consist of inactivated whole B. pertussis cells or purified antigens thereof, combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids. Although they are highly protective against severe pertussis disease, they fail to elicit mucosal immunity. Compared to natural infection, immune responses following immunization are short-lived and fail to prevent bacterial colonization of the upper respiratory tract. To overcome these shortcomings, efforts have been made for decades, and continue to be made, toward the development of mucosal vaccines against pertussis. OBJECTIVES: In this review we systematically analyzed published literature on protection conferred by mucosal immunization against pertussis. Immune responses mounted by these vaccines are summarized. METHOD: The PubMed Library database was searched for published studies on mucosal pertussis vaccines. Eligibility criteria included mucosal administration and the evaluation of at least one outcome related to efficacy, immunogenicity and safety. RESULTS: While over 349 publications were identified by the search, only 63 studies met the eligibility criteria. All eligible studies are included here. Initial attempts of mucosal whole-cell vaccine administration in humans provided promising results, but were not followed up. More recently, diverse vaccination strategies have been tested, including non-replicating and replicating vaccine candidates given by three different mucosal routes: orally, nasally or rectally. Several adjuvants and particulate formulations were tested to enhance the efficacy of non-replicating vaccines administered mucosally. Most novel vaccine candidates were only tested in animal models, mainly mice. Only one novel mucosal vaccine candidate was tested in baboons and in human trials. CONCLUSION: Three vaccination strategies drew our attention, as they provided protective and durable immunity in the respiratory tract, including the upper respiratory tract: acellular vaccines adjuvanted with lipopeptide LP1569 and c-di-GMP, outer membrane vesicles and the live attenuated BPZE1 vaccine. Among all experimental vaccines, BPZE1 is the only one that has advanced into clinical development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8239240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82392402021-06-30 Mucosal Immunization Against Pertussis: Lessons From the Past and Perspectives Dubois, Violaine Locht, Camille Front Immunol Immunology BACKGROUND: Current vaccination strategies against pertussis are sub-optimal. Optimal protection against Bordetella pertussis, the causative agent of pertussis, likely requires mucosal immunity. Current pertussis vaccines consist of inactivated whole B. pertussis cells or purified antigens thereof, combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids. Although they are highly protective against severe pertussis disease, they fail to elicit mucosal immunity. Compared to natural infection, immune responses following immunization are short-lived and fail to prevent bacterial colonization of the upper respiratory tract. To overcome these shortcomings, efforts have been made for decades, and continue to be made, toward the development of mucosal vaccines against pertussis. OBJECTIVES: In this review we systematically analyzed published literature on protection conferred by mucosal immunization against pertussis. Immune responses mounted by these vaccines are summarized. METHOD: The PubMed Library database was searched for published studies on mucosal pertussis vaccines. Eligibility criteria included mucosal administration and the evaluation of at least one outcome related to efficacy, immunogenicity and safety. RESULTS: While over 349 publications were identified by the search, only 63 studies met the eligibility criteria. All eligible studies are included here. Initial attempts of mucosal whole-cell vaccine administration in humans provided promising results, but were not followed up. More recently, diverse vaccination strategies have been tested, including non-replicating and replicating vaccine candidates given by three different mucosal routes: orally, nasally or rectally. Several adjuvants and particulate formulations were tested to enhance the efficacy of non-replicating vaccines administered mucosally. Most novel vaccine candidates were only tested in animal models, mainly mice. Only one novel mucosal vaccine candidate was tested in baboons and in human trials. CONCLUSION: Three vaccination strategies drew our attention, as they provided protective and durable immunity in the respiratory tract, including the upper respiratory tract: acellular vaccines adjuvanted with lipopeptide LP1569 and c-di-GMP, outer membrane vesicles and the live attenuated BPZE1 vaccine. Among all experimental vaccines, BPZE1 is the only one that has advanced into clinical development. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8239240/ /pubmed/34211481 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.701285 Text en Copyright © 2021 Dubois and Locht https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Dubois, Violaine
Locht, Camille
Mucosal Immunization Against Pertussis: Lessons From the Past and Perspectives
title Mucosal Immunization Against Pertussis: Lessons From the Past and Perspectives
title_full Mucosal Immunization Against Pertussis: Lessons From the Past and Perspectives
title_fullStr Mucosal Immunization Against Pertussis: Lessons From the Past and Perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Mucosal Immunization Against Pertussis: Lessons From the Past and Perspectives
title_short Mucosal Immunization Against Pertussis: Lessons From the Past and Perspectives
title_sort mucosal immunization against pertussis: lessons from the past and perspectives
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8239240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34211481
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.701285
work_keys_str_mv AT duboisviolaine mucosalimmunizationagainstpertussislessonsfromthepastandperspectives
AT lochtcamille mucosalimmunizationagainstpertussislessonsfromthepastandperspectives