Cargando…
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Local Treatment in Oligometastatic Disease
BACKGROUND: In certain malignancies, patients with oligometastatic disease benefit from radical ablative or surgical treatment. The SABR-COMET trial demonstrated a survival benefit for oligometastatic patients randomized to local stereotactic ablative radiation (SABR) compared to patients receiving...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8239286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34211842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.667993 |
_version_ | 1783715044713824256 |
---|---|
author | Mehrens, Dirk Unterrainer, Marcus Corradini, Stefanie Niyazi, Maximilian Manapov, Farkhad Westphalen, C. Benedikt Froelich, Matthias F. Wildgruber, Moritz Seidensticker, Max Ricke, Jens Rübenthaler, Johannes Kunz, Wolfgang G. |
author_facet | Mehrens, Dirk Unterrainer, Marcus Corradini, Stefanie Niyazi, Maximilian Manapov, Farkhad Westphalen, C. Benedikt Froelich, Matthias F. Wildgruber, Moritz Seidensticker, Max Ricke, Jens Rübenthaler, Johannes Kunz, Wolfgang G. |
author_sort | Mehrens, Dirk |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In certain malignancies, patients with oligometastatic disease benefit from radical ablative or surgical treatment. The SABR-COMET trial demonstrated a survival benefit for oligometastatic patients randomized to local stereotactic ablative radiation (SABR) compared to patients receiving standard care (SC) alone. Our aim was to determine the cost-effectiveness of SABR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision model based on partitioned survival simulations estimated costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) associated with both strategies in a United States setting from a health care perspective. Analyses were performed over the trial duration of six years as well as a long-term horizon of 16 years. Model input parameters were based on the SABR-COMET trial data as well as best available and most recent data provided in the published literature. An annual discount of 3% for costs was implemented in the analysis. All costs were adjusted to 2019 US Dollars according to the United States Consumer Price Index. SABR costs were reported with an average of $11,700 per treatment. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Incremental costs, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set to $100,000/QALY. RESULTS: Based on increased overall and progression-free survival, the SABR group showed 0.78 incremental QALYs over the trial duration and 1.34 incremental QALYs over the long-term analysis. Treatment with SABR led to a marginal increase in costs compared to SC alone (SABR: $304,656; SC: $303,523 for 6 years; ICER $1,446/QALY and SABR: $402,888; SC: $350,708 for long-term analysis; ICER $38,874/QALY). Therapy with SABR remained cost-effective until treatment costs of $88,969 over the trial duration (i.e. 7.6 times the average cost). Sensitivity analysis identified a strong model impact for ongoing annual costs of oligo- and polymetastatic disease states. CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests that local treatment with SABR adds QALYs for patients with certain oligometastatic cancers and represents an intermediate- and long-term cost-effective treatment strategy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8239286 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82392862021-06-30 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Local Treatment in Oligometastatic Disease Mehrens, Dirk Unterrainer, Marcus Corradini, Stefanie Niyazi, Maximilian Manapov, Farkhad Westphalen, C. Benedikt Froelich, Matthias F. Wildgruber, Moritz Seidensticker, Max Ricke, Jens Rübenthaler, Johannes Kunz, Wolfgang G. Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: In certain malignancies, patients with oligometastatic disease benefit from radical ablative or surgical treatment. The SABR-COMET trial demonstrated a survival benefit for oligometastatic patients randomized to local stereotactic ablative radiation (SABR) compared to patients receiving standard care (SC) alone. Our aim was to determine the cost-effectiveness of SABR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision model based on partitioned survival simulations estimated costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) associated with both strategies in a United States setting from a health care perspective. Analyses were performed over the trial duration of six years as well as a long-term horizon of 16 years. Model input parameters were based on the SABR-COMET trial data as well as best available and most recent data provided in the published literature. An annual discount of 3% for costs was implemented in the analysis. All costs were adjusted to 2019 US Dollars according to the United States Consumer Price Index. SABR costs were reported with an average of $11,700 per treatment. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Incremental costs, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set to $100,000/QALY. RESULTS: Based on increased overall and progression-free survival, the SABR group showed 0.78 incremental QALYs over the trial duration and 1.34 incremental QALYs over the long-term analysis. Treatment with SABR led to a marginal increase in costs compared to SC alone (SABR: $304,656; SC: $303,523 for 6 years; ICER $1,446/QALY and SABR: $402,888; SC: $350,708 for long-term analysis; ICER $38,874/QALY). Therapy with SABR remained cost-effective until treatment costs of $88,969 over the trial duration (i.e. 7.6 times the average cost). Sensitivity analysis identified a strong model impact for ongoing annual costs of oligo- and polymetastatic disease states. CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests that local treatment with SABR adds QALYs for patients with certain oligometastatic cancers and represents an intermediate- and long-term cost-effective treatment strategy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8239286/ /pubmed/34211842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.667993 Text en Copyright © 2021 Mehrens, Unterrainer, Corradini, Niyazi, Manapov, Westphalen, Froelich, Wildgruber, Seidensticker, Ricke, Rübenthaler and Kunz https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Mehrens, Dirk Unterrainer, Marcus Corradini, Stefanie Niyazi, Maximilian Manapov, Farkhad Westphalen, C. Benedikt Froelich, Matthias F. Wildgruber, Moritz Seidensticker, Max Ricke, Jens Rübenthaler, Johannes Kunz, Wolfgang G. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Local Treatment in Oligometastatic Disease |
title | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Local Treatment in Oligometastatic Disease |
title_full | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Local Treatment in Oligometastatic Disease |
title_fullStr | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Local Treatment in Oligometastatic Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Local Treatment in Oligometastatic Disease |
title_short | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Local Treatment in Oligometastatic Disease |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness analysis of local treatment in oligometastatic disease |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8239286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34211842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.667993 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mehrensdirk costeffectivenessanalysisoflocaltreatmentinoligometastaticdisease AT unterrainermarcus costeffectivenessanalysisoflocaltreatmentinoligometastaticdisease AT corradinistefanie costeffectivenessanalysisoflocaltreatmentinoligometastaticdisease AT niyazimaximilian costeffectivenessanalysisoflocaltreatmentinoligometastaticdisease AT manapovfarkhad costeffectivenessanalysisoflocaltreatmentinoligometastaticdisease AT westphalencbenedikt costeffectivenessanalysisoflocaltreatmentinoligometastaticdisease AT froelichmatthiasf costeffectivenessanalysisoflocaltreatmentinoligometastaticdisease AT wildgrubermoritz costeffectivenessanalysisoflocaltreatmentinoligometastaticdisease AT seidenstickermax costeffectivenessanalysisoflocaltreatmentinoligometastaticdisease AT rickejens costeffectivenessanalysisoflocaltreatmentinoligometastaticdisease AT rubenthalerjohannes costeffectivenessanalysisoflocaltreatmentinoligometastaticdisease AT kunzwolfgangg costeffectivenessanalysisoflocaltreatmentinoligometastaticdisease |