Cargando…

Evaluation of Antigenic Comparisons Among BVDV Isolates as it Relates to Humoral and Cell Mediated Responses

Antigenic differences between bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) vaccine strains and field isolates can lead to reduced vaccine efficacy. Historically, antigenic differences among BVDV strains were evaluated using techniques based on polyclonal and monoclonal antibody activity. The most common metho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Falkenberg, Shollie M., Dassanayake, Rohana P., Terhaar, Brett, Ridpath, Julia F., Neill, John D., Roth, James A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8239304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34212022
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.685114
_version_ 1783715049089531904
author Falkenberg, Shollie M.
Dassanayake, Rohana P.
Terhaar, Brett
Ridpath, Julia F.
Neill, John D.
Roth, James A.
author_facet Falkenberg, Shollie M.
Dassanayake, Rohana P.
Terhaar, Brett
Ridpath, Julia F.
Neill, John D.
Roth, James A.
author_sort Falkenberg, Shollie M.
collection PubMed
description Antigenic differences between bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) vaccine strains and field isolates can lead to reduced vaccine efficacy. Historically, antigenic differences among BVDV strains were evaluated using techniques based on polyclonal and monoclonal antibody activity. The most common method for antigenic comparison among BVDV isolates is determination of virus neutralization titer (VNT). BVDV antigenic comparisons using VNT only account for the humoral component of the adaptive immune response, and not cell mediated immunity (CMI) giving an incomplete picture of protective responses. Currently, little data is available regarding potential antigenic differences between BVDV vaccine strains and field isolates as measured by CMI responses. The goal of the current paper is to evaluate two groups of cattle that differed in the frequency they were vaccinated, to determine if similar trends in CMI responses exist within each respective group when stimulated with antigenically different BVDV strains. Data from the current study demonstrated variability in the CMI response is associated with the viral strain used for stimulation. Variability in IFN-γ mRNA expression was most pronounced in the CD4(+) population, this was observed between the viruses within each respective BVDV subgenotype in the Group 1 calves. The increase in frequency of CD25(+) cells and IFN-γ mRNA expression in the CD8(+) and CD335(+) populations were not as variable between BVDV strains used for stimulation in the Group 1 calves. Additionally, an inverse relationship between VNT and IFN-γ mRNA expression was observed, as the lowest VNT and highest IFN-γ mRNA expression was observed and vice versa, the highest VNT and lowest IFN-γ mRNA expression was observed. A similar trend regardless of vaccination status was observed between the two groups of calves, as the BVDV-1b strain had lower IFN-γ mRNA expression. Collectively, data from the current study and previous data support, conferring protection against BVDV as a method for control of BVDV in cattle populations is still a complex issue and requires a multifactorial approach to understand factors associated with vaccine efficacy or conversely vaccine failure. Although, there does appear to be an antigenic component associated with CMI responses as well as with humoral responses as determined by VNT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8239304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82393042021-06-30 Evaluation of Antigenic Comparisons Among BVDV Isolates as it Relates to Humoral and Cell Mediated Responses Falkenberg, Shollie M. Dassanayake, Rohana P. Terhaar, Brett Ridpath, Julia F. Neill, John D. Roth, James A. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Antigenic differences between bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) vaccine strains and field isolates can lead to reduced vaccine efficacy. Historically, antigenic differences among BVDV strains were evaluated using techniques based on polyclonal and monoclonal antibody activity. The most common method for antigenic comparison among BVDV isolates is determination of virus neutralization titer (VNT). BVDV antigenic comparisons using VNT only account for the humoral component of the adaptive immune response, and not cell mediated immunity (CMI) giving an incomplete picture of protective responses. Currently, little data is available regarding potential antigenic differences between BVDV vaccine strains and field isolates as measured by CMI responses. The goal of the current paper is to evaluate two groups of cattle that differed in the frequency they were vaccinated, to determine if similar trends in CMI responses exist within each respective group when stimulated with antigenically different BVDV strains. Data from the current study demonstrated variability in the CMI response is associated with the viral strain used for stimulation. Variability in IFN-γ mRNA expression was most pronounced in the CD4(+) population, this was observed between the viruses within each respective BVDV subgenotype in the Group 1 calves. The increase in frequency of CD25(+) cells and IFN-γ mRNA expression in the CD8(+) and CD335(+) populations were not as variable between BVDV strains used for stimulation in the Group 1 calves. Additionally, an inverse relationship between VNT and IFN-γ mRNA expression was observed, as the lowest VNT and highest IFN-γ mRNA expression was observed and vice versa, the highest VNT and lowest IFN-γ mRNA expression was observed. A similar trend regardless of vaccination status was observed between the two groups of calves, as the BVDV-1b strain had lower IFN-γ mRNA expression. Collectively, data from the current study and previous data support, conferring protection against BVDV as a method for control of BVDV in cattle populations is still a complex issue and requires a multifactorial approach to understand factors associated with vaccine efficacy or conversely vaccine failure. Although, there does appear to be an antigenic component associated with CMI responses as well as with humoral responses as determined by VNT. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8239304/ /pubmed/34212022 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.685114 Text en Copyright © 2021 Falkenberg, Dassanayake, Terhaar, Ridpath, Neill and Roth. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Falkenberg, Shollie M.
Dassanayake, Rohana P.
Terhaar, Brett
Ridpath, Julia F.
Neill, John D.
Roth, James A.
Evaluation of Antigenic Comparisons Among BVDV Isolates as it Relates to Humoral and Cell Mediated Responses
title Evaluation of Antigenic Comparisons Among BVDV Isolates as it Relates to Humoral and Cell Mediated Responses
title_full Evaluation of Antigenic Comparisons Among BVDV Isolates as it Relates to Humoral and Cell Mediated Responses
title_fullStr Evaluation of Antigenic Comparisons Among BVDV Isolates as it Relates to Humoral and Cell Mediated Responses
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Antigenic Comparisons Among BVDV Isolates as it Relates to Humoral and Cell Mediated Responses
title_short Evaluation of Antigenic Comparisons Among BVDV Isolates as it Relates to Humoral and Cell Mediated Responses
title_sort evaluation of antigenic comparisons among bvdv isolates as it relates to humoral and cell mediated responses
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8239304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34212022
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.685114
work_keys_str_mv AT falkenbergsholliem evaluationofantigeniccomparisonsamongbvdvisolatesasitrelatestohumoralandcellmediatedresponses
AT dassanayakerohanap evaluationofantigeniccomparisonsamongbvdvisolatesasitrelatestohumoralandcellmediatedresponses
AT terhaarbrett evaluationofantigeniccomparisonsamongbvdvisolatesasitrelatestohumoralandcellmediatedresponses
AT ridpathjuliaf evaluationofantigeniccomparisonsamongbvdvisolatesasitrelatestohumoralandcellmediatedresponses
AT neilljohnd evaluationofantigeniccomparisonsamongbvdvisolatesasitrelatestohumoralandcellmediatedresponses
AT rothjamesa evaluationofantigeniccomparisonsamongbvdvisolatesasitrelatestohumoralandcellmediatedresponses