Cargando…

Peer Reviewers in Central Asia: Publons Based Analysis

BACKGROUND: The five Central Asian republics comprise of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. Their research and publication activities are gradually improving but there is limited data on how good their peer reviewing practices are. METHODS: We have use the Publons data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmed, Sakir, Yessirkepov, Marlen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8239425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34184435
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e169
_version_ 1783715074771255296
author Ahmed, Sakir
Yessirkepov, Marlen
author_facet Ahmed, Sakir
Yessirkepov, Marlen
author_sort Ahmed, Sakir
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The five Central Asian republics comprise of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. Their research and publication activities are gradually improving but there is limited data on how good their peer reviewing practices are. METHODS: We have use the Publons database to extract information on the reviewers registered including the number of verified review, Publons award winners, and top universities in the domain of peer reviewing. This has been analysed overall and country wise. RESULTS: Of 15,764 researchers registered on Publons, only 370 (11.7%) have verified records of peer-reviewing. There are 8 Publons award winners. There is great heterogeneity in the number of active reviewers across the five countries. Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan account for more than 90% of verified reviewers. Only Kazakhstan has more than 100 active reviewers and 6 Publons award recipients. Amongst the top 20 reviewers from Central Asia, half of them are from the Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan. Three countries have less than 10 universities registered on Publons. CONCLUSION: Central Asia has a good number of peer reviewers on Publons though only a minority of researchers are involved in peer reviewing. However, the heterogeneity between the nations can be best dealt with by promoting awareness and international networking including e-learning and mentoring programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8239425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82394252021-07-06 Peer Reviewers in Central Asia: Publons Based Analysis Ahmed, Sakir Yessirkepov, Marlen J Korean Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: The five Central Asian republics comprise of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. Their research and publication activities are gradually improving but there is limited data on how good their peer reviewing practices are. METHODS: We have use the Publons database to extract information on the reviewers registered including the number of verified review, Publons award winners, and top universities in the domain of peer reviewing. This has been analysed overall and country wise. RESULTS: Of 15,764 researchers registered on Publons, only 370 (11.7%) have verified records of peer-reviewing. There are 8 Publons award winners. There is great heterogeneity in the number of active reviewers across the five countries. Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan account for more than 90% of verified reviewers. Only Kazakhstan has more than 100 active reviewers and 6 Publons award recipients. Amongst the top 20 reviewers from Central Asia, half of them are from the Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan. Three countries have less than 10 universities registered on Publons. CONCLUSION: Central Asia has a good number of peer reviewers on Publons though only a minority of researchers are involved in peer reviewing. However, the heterogeneity between the nations can be best dealt with by promoting awareness and international networking including e-learning and mentoring programs. The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2021-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8239425/ /pubmed/34184435 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e169 Text en © 2021 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ahmed, Sakir
Yessirkepov, Marlen
Peer Reviewers in Central Asia: Publons Based Analysis
title Peer Reviewers in Central Asia: Publons Based Analysis
title_full Peer Reviewers in Central Asia: Publons Based Analysis
title_fullStr Peer Reviewers in Central Asia: Publons Based Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Peer Reviewers in Central Asia: Publons Based Analysis
title_short Peer Reviewers in Central Asia: Publons Based Analysis
title_sort peer reviewers in central asia: publons based analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8239425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34184435
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e169
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedsakir peerreviewersincentralasiapublonsbasedanalysis
AT yessirkepovmarlen peerreviewersincentralasiapublonsbasedanalysis