Cargando…
Demographic and socioeconomic trends in DNA banking utilization in the USA
Demographic and clinical information from de-identified individuals utilizing a single DNA banking service over a 22-year period was assessed using descriptive statistics. The socioeconomic characteristics of the study population were estimated using a zip code–level analysis of US Census data and c...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8239484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34185264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12687-021-00533-4 |
_version_ | 1783715088129064960 |
---|---|
author | Prudent, Joshua Lopez, Esthermarie Dorshorst, Donna Cox, Hannah C. Bodurtha, Joann N. |
author_facet | Prudent, Joshua Lopez, Esthermarie Dorshorst, Donna Cox, Hannah C. Bodurtha, Joann N. |
author_sort | Prudent, Joshua |
collection | PubMed |
description | Demographic and clinical information from de-identified individuals utilizing a single DNA banking service over a 22-year period was assessed using descriptive statistics. The socioeconomic characteristics of the study population were estimated using a zip code–level analysis of US Census data and compared to national US Metrics for 2016. Samples from 4,874 individuals were deposited to a single commercial DNA bank from 1997 to 2019. Samples originated from 31 countries across 6 continents, with the majority of samples originating from the United States (US; 97.37%; n = 4,746). A higher proportion of individuals identifying as females (55.58%; n = 2,709) utilized the service compared to males (41.18%; n = 2,007). The age distribution was bimodal, peaking around 5 years of age and again around 65 years of age. Whole blood was the preferred specimen for submission. Sample deposits peaked in 2015 with 559 annual deposits. Clinical genetic counselors were the most common referral source (41.73%; n = 2,034). Individuals utilizing DNA banking services are estimated to reside in wealthier, more educated and less racially diverse zip codes compared to national metrics. Although direct to consumer DNA banking is being utilized by the general public and clinical genetic counselors in the US, it is not widespread. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12687-021-00533-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8239484 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82394842021-06-29 Demographic and socioeconomic trends in DNA banking utilization in the USA Prudent, Joshua Lopez, Esthermarie Dorshorst, Donna Cox, Hannah C. Bodurtha, Joann N. J Community Genet Original Article Demographic and clinical information from de-identified individuals utilizing a single DNA banking service over a 22-year period was assessed using descriptive statistics. The socioeconomic characteristics of the study population were estimated using a zip code–level analysis of US Census data and compared to national US Metrics for 2016. Samples from 4,874 individuals were deposited to a single commercial DNA bank from 1997 to 2019. Samples originated from 31 countries across 6 continents, with the majority of samples originating from the United States (US; 97.37%; n = 4,746). A higher proportion of individuals identifying as females (55.58%; n = 2,709) utilized the service compared to males (41.18%; n = 2,007). The age distribution was bimodal, peaking around 5 years of age and again around 65 years of age. Whole blood was the preferred specimen for submission. Sample deposits peaked in 2015 with 559 annual deposits. Clinical genetic counselors were the most common referral source (41.73%; n = 2,034). Individuals utilizing DNA banking services are estimated to reside in wealthier, more educated and less racially diverse zip codes compared to national metrics. Although direct to consumer DNA banking is being utilized by the general public and clinical genetic counselors in the US, it is not widespread. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12687-021-00533-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-29 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8239484/ /pubmed/34185264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12687-021-00533-4 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 |
spellingShingle | Original Article Prudent, Joshua Lopez, Esthermarie Dorshorst, Donna Cox, Hannah C. Bodurtha, Joann N. Demographic and socioeconomic trends in DNA banking utilization in the USA |
title | Demographic and socioeconomic trends in DNA banking utilization in the USA |
title_full | Demographic and socioeconomic trends in DNA banking utilization in the USA |
title_fullStr | Demographic and socioeconomic trends in DNA banking utilization in the USA |
title_full_unstemmed | Demographic and socioeconomic trends in DNA banking utilization in the USA |
title_short | Demographic and socioeconomic trends in DNA banking utilization in the USA |
title_sort | demographic and socioeconomic trends in dna banking utilization in the usa |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8239484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34185264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12687-021-00533-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prudentjoshua demographicandsocioeconomictrendsindnabankingutilizationintheusa AT lopezesthermarie demographicandsocioeconomictrendsindnabankingutilizationintheusa AT dorshorstdonna demographicandsocioeconomictrendsindnabankingutilizationintheusa AT coxhannahc demographicandsocioeconomictrendsindnabankingutilizationintheusa AT bodurthajoannn demographicandsocioeconomictrendsindnabankingutilizationintheusa |