Cargando…

Demographic and socioeconomic trends in DNA banking utilization in the USA

Demographic and clinical information from de-identified individuals utilizing a single DNA banking service over a 22-year period was assessed using descriptive statistics. The socioeconomic characteristics of the study population were estimated using a zip code–level analysis of US Census data and c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prudent, Joshua, Lopez, Esthermarie, Dorshorst, Donna, Cox, Hannah C., Bodurtha, Joann N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8239484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34185264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12687-021-00533-4
_version_ 1783715088129064960
author Prudent, Joshua
Lopez, Esthermarie
Dorshorst, Donna
Cox, Hannah C.
Bodurtha, Joann N.
author_facet Prudent, Joshua
Lopez, Esthermarie
Dorshorst, Donna
Cox, Hannah C.
Bodurtha, Joann N.
author_sort Prudent, Joshua
collection PubMed
description Demographic and clinical information from de-identified individuals utilizing a single DNA banking service over a 22-year period was assessed using descriptive statistics. The socioeconomic characteristics of the study population were estimated using a zip code–level analysis of US Census data and compared to national US Metrics for 2016. Samples from 4,874 individuals were deposited to a single commercial DNA bank from 1997 to 2019. Samples originated from 31 countries across 6 continents, with the majority of samples originating from the United States (US; 97.37%; n = 4,746). A higher proportion of individuals identifying as females (55.58%; n = 2,709) utilized the service compared to males (41.18%; n = 2,007). The age distribution was bimodal, peaking around 5 years of age and again around 65 years of age. Whole blood was the preferred specimen for submission. Sample deposits peaked in 2015 with 559 annual deposits. Clinical genetic counselors were the most common referral source (41.73%; n = 2,034). Individuals utilizing DNA banking services are estimated to reside in wealthier, more educated and less racially diverse zip codes compared to national metrics. Although direct to consumer DNA banking is being utilized by the general public and clinical genetic counselors in the US, it is not widespread. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12687-021-00533-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8239484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82394842021-06-29 Demographic and socioeconomic trends in DNA banking utilization in the USA Prudent, Joshua Lopez, Esthermarie Dorshorst, Donna Cox, Hannah C. Bodurtha, Joann N. J Community Genet Original Article Demographic and clinical information from de-identified individuals utilizing a single DNA banking service over a 22-year period was assessed using descriptive statistics. The socioeconomic characteristics of the study population were estimated using a zip code–level analysis of US Census data and compared to national US Metrics for 2016. Samples from 4,874 individuals were deposited to a single commercial DNA bank from 1997 to 2019. Samples originated from 31 countries across 6 continents, with the majority of samples originating from the United States (US; 97.37%; n = 4,746). A higher proportion of individuals identifying as females (55.58%; n = 2,709) utilized the service compared to males (41.18%; n = 2,007). The age distribution was bimodal, peaking around 5 years of age and again around 65 years of age. Whole blood was the preferred specimen for submission. Sample deposits peaked in 2015 with 559 annual deposits. Clinical genetic counselors were the most common referral source (41.73%; n = 2,034). Individuals utilizing DNA banking services are estimated to reside in wealthier, more educated and less racially diverse zip codes compared to national metrics. Although direct to consumer DNA banking is being utilized by the general public and clinical genetic counselors in the US, it is not widespread. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12687-021-00533-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-29 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8239484/ /pubmed/34185264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12687-021-00533-4 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021
spellingShingle Original Article
Prudent, Joshua
Lopez, Esthermarie
Dorshorst, Donna
Cox, Hannah C.
Bodurtha, Joann N.
Demographic and socioeconomic trends in DNA banking utilization in the USA
title Demographic and socioeconomic trends in DNA banking utilization in the USA
title_full Demographic and socioeconomic trends in DNA banking utilization in the USA
title_fullStr Demographic and socioeconomic trends in DNA banking utilization in the USA
title_full_unstemmed Demographic and socioeconomic trends in DNA banking utilization in the USA
title_short Demographic and socioeconomic trends in DNA banking utilization in the USA
title_sort demographic and socioeconomic trends in dna banking utilization in the usa
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8239484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34185264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12687-021-00533-4
work_keys_str_mv AT prudentjoshua demographicandsocioeconomictrendsindnabankingutilizationintheusa
AT lopezesthermarie demographicandsocioeconomictrendsindnabankingutilizationintheusa
AT dorshorstdonna demographicandsocioeconomictrendsindnabankingutilizationintheusa
AT coxhannahc demographicandsocioeconomictrendsindnabankingutilizationintheusa
AT bodurthajoannn demographicandsocioeconomictrendsindnabankingutilizationintheusa