Cargando…

Communication protocols evaluation for a wireless rainfall monitoring network in an urban area

Rainfall monitoring networks are key elements for the development of alerts and prediction models for communities at risk of flooding during high intensity rainfall events. Currently, most of these networks send the precipitation measurement to a data center in real-time using wireless communication...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ortega-Gonzalez, Lilia, Acosta-Coll, Melisa, Piñeres-Espitia, Gabriel, Aziz Butt, Shariq
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8239730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34195448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07353
_version_ 1783715105450491904
author Ortega-Gonzalez, Lilia
Acosta-Coll, Melisa
Piñeres-Espitia, Gabriel
Aziz Butt, Shariq
author_facet Ortega-Gonzalez, Lilia
Acosta-Coll, Melisa
Piñeres-Espitia, Gabriel
Aziz Butt, Shariq
author_sort Ortega-Gonzalez, Lilia
collection PubMed
description Rainfall monitoring networks are key elements for the development of alerts and prediction models for communities at risk of flooding during high intensity rainfall events. Currently, most of these networks send the precipitation measurement to a data center in real-time using wireless communication protocols, avoiding travel to the measurement site. An Early Warning System (EWS) for pluvial flash floods developed in Barranquilla (Colombia), used the GPRS protocol to send rain gauge data in real-time to a web server for further processing; however, this protocol has a high consumption of energy and also high maintenance costs. This article carried out an evaluation in terms of link budget, link profile, energy consumption and devices costs of three low-power wireless communication protocols, Zigbee, LoRaWAN and Sigfox, to determine which one is the most suitable for the EWS of the city of Barranquilla. To perform the evaluation, a wireless sensor network was designed and characterized for Zigbee and LoRaWAN with Radio Mobile tool taking into account the measurement points implemented with GPRS network. The evaluation included the power consumption of Zigbee, LoRaWAN and Sigfox. From the results of simulations, LoRaWAN and Zigbee network has similar radio signal received and the LoRaWAN network obtains the least losses per path. As for power consumption, the LoRaWAN devices has the lowest energy consumption, as well as, the LoRaWAN network sensor nodes are cheaper. Finally, the protocol with the best general performance was LoRAWAN, since complies with the communication, consumption and cost requirements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8239730
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82397302021-06-29 Communication protocols evaluation for a wireless rainfall monitoring network in an urban area Ortega-Gonzalez, Lilia Acosta-Coll, Melisa Piñeres-Espitia, Gabriel Aziz Butt, Shariq Heliyon Research Article Rainfall monitoring networks are key elements for the development of alerts and prediction models for communities at risk of flooding during high intensity rainfall events. Currently, most of these networks send the precipitation measurement to a data center in real-time using wireless communication protocols, avoiding travel to the measurement site. An Early Warning System (EWS) for pluvial flash floods developed in Barranquilla (Colombia), used the GPRS protocol to send rain gauge data in real-time to a web server for further processing; however, this protocol has a high consumption of energy and also high maintenance costs. This article carried out an evaluation in terms of link budget, link profile, energy consumption and devices costs of three low-power wireless communication protocols, Zigbee, LoRaWAN and Sigfox, to determine which one is the most suitable for the EWS of the city of Barranquilla. To perform the evaluation, a wireless sensor network was designed and characterized for Zigbee and LoRaWAN with Radio Mobile tool taking into account the measurement points implemented with GPRS network. The evaluation included the power consumption of Zigbee, LoRaWAN and Sigfox. From the results of simulations, LoRaWAN and Zigbee network has similar radio signal received and the LoRaWAN network obtains the least losses per path. As for power consumption, the LoRaWAN devices has the lowest energy consumption, as well as, the LoRaWAN network sensor nodes are cheaper. Finally, the protocol with the best general performance was LoRAWAN, since complies with the communication, consumption and cost requirements. Elsevier 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8239730/ /pubmed/34195448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07353 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Ortega-Gonzalez, Lilia
Acosta-Coll, Melisa
Piñeres-Espitia, Gabriel
Aziz Butt, Shariq
Communication protocols evaluation for a wireless rainfall monitoring network in an urban area
title Communication protocols evaluation for a wireless rainfall monitoring network in an urban area
title_full Communication protocols evaluation for a wireless rainfall monitoring network in an urban area
title_fullStr Communication protocols evaluation for a wireless rainfall monitoring network in an urban area
title_full_unstemmed Communication protocols evaluation for a wireless rainfall monitoring network in an urban area
title_short Communication protocols evaluation for a wireless rainfall monitoring network in an urban area
title_sort communication protocols evaluation for a wireless rainfall monitoring network in an urban area
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8239730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34195448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07353
work_keys_str_mv AT ortegagonzalezlilia communicationprotocolsevaluationforawirelessrainfallmonitoringnetworkinanurbanarea
AT acostacollmelisa communicationprotocolsevaluationforawirelessrainfallmonitoringnetworkinanurbanarea
AT pineresespitiagabriel communicationprotocolsevaluationforawirelessrainfallmonitoringnetworkinanurbanarea
AT azizbuttshariq communicationprotocolsevaluationforawirelessrainfallmonitoringnetworkinanurbanarea