Cargando…

Differential expression of miRNAs as biomarkers for predicting the outcomes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients

Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) used to be defined as germinal center B-like and non-germinal center B-like subtypes, associated with different prognoses, but the conventional classification does not meet the needs of clinical practice because of DLBCL heterogeneity, a problem that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Maogui, Wang, Xinchen, Liu, Ning, Ding, Kaiyang, Zhang, Guihong, Liu, Xiaosi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Portland Press Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8239963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34109978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BSR20201551
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) used to be defined as germinal center B-like and non-germinal center B-like subtypes, associated with different prognoses, but the conventional classification does not meet the needs of clinical practice because of DLBCL heterogeneity, a problem that might be improved by selection of miRNAs as biomarkers. Methods: Twelve patients with DLBCLs were used to screen out the aberrant miRNA profile using miRNA microarray technology in two patient subtypes (six germinal center B-like and six non-germinal center B-like patients). The potential biomarkers were further analyzed using the quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction method in 95 DLBCL patients to investigate relationships among expression levels of potent miRNA, clinicopathological features and survival rates of patients. Results: miR-208a-5p, miR-296-5p and miR-1304-5p were screened as potential biomarkers. miR-208a-5p and miR-296-5p were shown to be associated with better survival of patients after Kaplan–Meier analysis, whereas miR-1304-5p overexpression indicated a poor survival prognosis independent of the DLBCL subtype. In addition, changes of miR-296-5p and miR-1304-5p expression, the International Prognostic Index (IPI) status and the age of patients were all independent indicators for DLBCL prognosis. We also found that high miR-208a-5p expression led to better outcomes in DLBCL patients with similar IPI scores; however high miR-1304-5p expression tended to indicate the opposite. Conclusions: MiR-208a-5p, miR-296-5p and miR-1304-5p levels might be potential biomarkers for the prediction of the prognosis of DLBCL patients.