Cargando…
Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention
INTRODUCTION: Implications of lubricant use in men having sex with men (MSM) are poorly characterized, particularly associations with sexual behavior and rectal sexually transmitted infection (STI) risk. AIM: We sought to clarify covariates associated with lubrication type including differing sexual...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8240147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33789174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2021.100341 |
_version_ | 1783715155335446528 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Austin Gaither, Thomas W. Langston, Marvin E. Cohen, Stephanie E. Breyer, Benjamin N. |
author_facet | Lee, Austin Gaither, Thomas W. Langston, Marvin E. Cohen, Stephanie E. Breyer, Benjamin N. |
author_sort | Lee, Austin |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Implications of lubricant use in men having sex with men (MSM) are poorly characterized, particularly associations with sexual behavior and rectal sexually transmitted infection (STI) risk. AIM: We sought to clarify covariates associated with lubrication type including differing sexual preferences and rectal STI prevalence. METHODS: Primary English-speaking individuals ≥18 years old visiting San Francisco City Clinic (SFCC) between April and May of 2018 who endorsed lubricant use during receptive anal sex within the last 3 months were studied. Associations between lubrication type used and collected covariates were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance for continuous variables and Chi-squared test for categorical variables. We used logistic regression to examine the association between lubrication type and rectal STI test result. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rectal STI test positivity. RESULTS: From all enrolled participants, 179 completed the survey and endorsed use of a lubricant during receptive anal sex within the last 3 months. Silicone lubricant users had the most sexual partners in the last 3 months (13 [mean] ± 30 [SD], P= .0003) and were most likely to have a history of gonorrhea. Oil-based lubricant users had the most partners with whom they had receptive anal sex in the last 3 months (7 ± 6, P= .03). Water-based lubricant users most commonly used a condom in their last sexual encounter and had the fewest sexual partners in the last 3 months (4 ± 4, P= .0003). Spit/saliva lubricant use was associated with positive rectal STI result. CONCLUSION: Silicone and oil-based lubricant users were more likely to report condomless receptive anal sex and to have a history of gonorrhea while spit/saliva lubricant use associated with positive rectal STI acquisition. Lee A, Gaither TW, Langston ME, et al. Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention. Sex Med 2021;9:100341. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8240147 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82401472021-06-29 Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention Lee, Austin Gaither, Thomas W. Langston, Marvin E. Cohen, Stephanie E. Breyer, Benjamin N. Sex Med Original Research INTRODUCTION: Implications of lubricant use in men having sex with men (MSM) are poorly characterized, particularly associations with sexual behavior and rectal sexually transmitted infection (STI) risk. AIM: We sought to clarify covariates associated with lubrication type including differing sexual preferences and rectal STI prevalence. METHODS: Primary English-speaking individuals ≥18 years old visiting San Francisco City Clinic (SFCC) between April and May of 2018 who endorsed lubricant use during receptive anal sex within the last 3 months were studied. Associations between lubrication type used and collected covariates were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance for continuous variables and Chi-squared test for categorical variables. We used logistic regression to examine the association between lubrication type and rectal STI test result. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rectal STI test positivity. RESULTS: From all enrolled participants, 179 completed the survey and endorsed use of a lubricant during receptive anal sex within the last 3 months. Silicone lubricant users had the most sexual partners in the last 3 months (13 [mean] ± 30 [SD], P= .0003) and were most likely to have a history of gonorrhea. Oil-based lubricant users had the most partners with whom they had receptive anal sex in the last 3 months (7 ± 6, P= .03). Water-based lubricant users most commonly used a condom in their last sexual encounter and had the fewest sexual partners in the last 3 months (4 ± 4, P= .0003). Spit/saliva lubricant use was associated with positive rectal STI result. CONCLUSION: Silicone and oil-based lubricant users were more likely to report condomless receptive anal sex and to have a history of gonorrhea while spit/saliva lubricant use associated with positive rectal STI acquisition. Lee A, Gaither TW, Langston ME, et al. Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention. Sex Med 2021;9:100341. Elsevier 2021-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8240147/ /pubmed/33789174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2021.100341 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the International Society for Sexual Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Lee, Austin Gaither, Thomas W. Langston, Marvin E. Cohen, Stephanie E. Breyer, Benjamin N. Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention |
title | Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention |
title_full | Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention |
title_fullStr | Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention |
title_full_unstemmed | Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention |
title_short | Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention |
title_sort | lubrication practices and receptive anal sex: implications for sti transmission and prevention |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8240147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33789174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2021.100341 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leeaustin lubricationpracticesandreceptiveanalseximplicationsforstitransmissionandprevention AT gaitherthomasw lubricationpracticesandreceptiveanalseximplicationsforstitransmissionandprevention AT langstonmarvine lubricationpracticesandreceptiveanalseximplicationsforstitransmissionandprevention AT cohenstephaniee lubricationpracticesandreceptiveanalseximplicationsforstitransmissionandprevention AT breyerbenjaminn lubricationpracticesandreceptiveanalseximplicationsforstitransmissionandprevention |