Cargando…

Influences on catch-up growth using relative versus absolute metrics: evidence from the MAL-ED cohort study

BACKGROUND: Poor growth in early childhood has been considered irreversible after 2–3 years of age and has been associated with morbidity and mortality over the short-term and with poor economic and cognitive outcomes over the long-term. The MAL-ED cohort study was performed in eight low-income sett...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richard, Stephanie A., McCormick, Benjamin J. J., Murray-Kolb, Laura E., Bessong, Pascal, Shrestha, Sanjaya K., Mduma, Estomih, Ahmed, Tahmeed, Kang, Gagandeep, Lee, Gwenyth O., Seidman, Jessica C., Svensen, Erling, Kosek, Margaret N., Caulfield, Laura E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8240385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34187407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11120-0
_version_ 1783715205991104512
author Richard, Stephanie A.
McCormick, Benjamin J. J.
Murray-Kolb, Laura E.
Bessong, Pascal
Shrestha, Sanjaya K.
Mduma, Estomih
Ahmed, Tahmeed
Kang, Gagandeep
Lee, Gwenyth O.
Seidman, Jessica C.
Svensen, Erling
Kosek, Margaret N.
Caulfield, Laura E.
author_facet Richard, Stephanie A.
McCormick, Benjamin J. J.
Murray-Kolb, Laura E.
Bessong, Pascal
Shrestha, Sanjaya K.
Mduma, Estomih
Ahmed, Tahmeed
Kang, Gagandeep
Lee, Gwenyth O.
Seidman, Jessica C.
Svensen, Erling
Kosek, Margaret N.
Caulfield, Laura E.
author_sort Richard, Stephanie A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Poor growth in early childhood has been considered irreversible after 2–3 years of age and has been associated with morbidity and mortality over the short-term and with poor economic and cognitive outcomes over the long-term. The MAL-ED cohort study was performed in eight low-income settings with the goal of evaluating relationships between the child’s environment and experience (dietary, illness, and pathogen exposure, among others) and their growth and development. The goal of this analysis is to determine whether there are differences in the factors associated with growth from 24 to 60 months using two different metrics. METHODS: Across six MAL-ED sites, 942 children had anthropometry data at 24 and 60 months, as well as information about socioeconomic status, maternal height, gut permeability (lactulose-mannitol z-score (LMZ)), dietary intake from 9 to 24 months, and micronutrient status. Anthropometric changes were in height- or weight-for-age z-score (HAZ, WAZ), their absolute difference from the growth standard median (HAD (cm), WAD (kg)), as well as recovery from stunting/underweight. Outcomes were modeled using multivariate regression. RESULTS: At 24 months, almost half of the cohort was stunted (45%) and 21% were underweight. Among those who were stunted at 24 months (n = 426), 185 (43%) were no longer stunted at 60 months. Most children increased their HAZ from 24 to 60 months (81%), whereas fewer (33%) had positive changes in their HAD. Linear regression models indicate that girls improved less than boys from 24 to 60 months (HAZ: -0.21 (95% CI -0.27, -0.15); HAD: -0.75 (-1.07, -0.43)). Greater intestinal permeability (higher LMZ) at 0–24 months was associated with lower relative and absolute changes from 24 to 60 months (HAZ: -0.10 (-0.16, -0.04); HAD: -0.47 (-0.73, -0.21)). Maternal height (per 10 cm) was positively associated with changes (HAZ: 0.09 (0.03, 0.15); HAD: 0.45 (0.15, 0.75)). Similar relationships were identified for changes in WAZ and WAD. CONCLUSIONS: The study children demonstrated improved growth from 24 to 60 months of age, but only a subset had positive changes in HAD and WAD. The same environmental factors were associated with growth from 24 to 60 months regardless of metric used (change in HAZ or HAD, or WAZ and WAD). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11120-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8240385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82403852021-06-30 Influences on catch-up growth using relative versus absolute metrics: evidence from the MAL-ED cohort study Richard, Stephanie A. McCormick, Benjamin J. J. Murray-Kolb, Laura E. Bessong, Pascal Shrestha, Sanjaya K. Mduma, Estomih Ahmed, Tahmeed Kang, Gagandeep Lee, Gwenyth O. Seidman, Jessica C. Svensen, Erling Kosek, Margaret N. Caulfield, Laura E. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Poor growth in early childhood has been considered irreversible after 2–3 years of age and has been associated with morbidity and mortality over the short-term and with poor economic and cognitive outcomes over the long-term. The MAL-ED cohort study was performed in eight low-income settings with the goal of evaluating relationships between the child’s environment and experience (dietary, illness, and pathogen exposure, among others) and their growth and development. The goal of this analysis is to determine whether there are differences in the factors associated with growth from 24 to 60 months using two different metrics. METHODS: Across six MAL-ED sites, 942 children had anthropometry data at 24 and 60 months, as well as information about socioeconomic status, maternal height, gut permeability (lactulose-mannitol z-score (LMZ)), dietary intake from 9 to 24 months, and micronutrient status. Anthropometric changes were in height- or weight-for-age z-score (HAZ, WAZ), their absolute difference from the growth standard median (HAD (cm), WAD (kg)), as well as recovery from stunting/underweight. Outcomes were modeled using multivariate regression. RESULTS: At 24 months, almost half of the cohort was stunted (45%) and 21% were underweight. Among those who were stunted at 24 months (n = 426), 185 (43%) were no longer stunted at 60 months. Most children increased their HAZ from 24 to 60 months (81%), whereas fewer (33%) had positive changes in their HAD. Linear regression models indicate that girls improved less than boys from 24 to 60 months (HAZ: -0.21 (95% CI -0.27, -0.15); HAD: -0.75 (-1.07, -0.43)). Greater intestinal permeability (higher LMZ) at 0–24 months was associated with lower relative and absolute changes from 24 to 60 months (HAZ: -0.10 (-0.16, -0.04); HAD: -0.47 (-0.73, -0.21)). Maternal height (per 10 cm) was positively associated with changes (HAZ: 0.09 (0.03, 0.15); HAD: 0.45 (0.15, 0.75)). Similar relationships were identified for changes in WAZ and WAD. CONCLUSIONS: The study children demonstrated improved growth from 24 to 60 months of age, but only a subset had positive changes in HAD and WAD. The same environmental factors were associated with growth from 24 to 60 months regardless of metric used (change in HAZ or HAD, or WAZ and WAD). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11120-0. BioMed Central 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8240385/ /pubmed/34187407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11120-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Richard, Stephanie A.
McCormick, Benjamin J. J.
Murray-Kolb, Laura E.
Bessong, Pascal
Shrestha, Sanjaya K.
Mduma, Estomih
Ahmed, Tahmeed
Kang, Gagandeep
Lee, Gwenyth O.
Seidman, Jessica C.
Svensen, Erling
Kosek, Margaret N.
Caulfield, Laura E.
Influences on catch-up growth using relative versus absolute metrics: evidence from the MAL-ED cohort study
title Influences on catch-up growth using relative versus absolute metrics: evidence from the MAL-ED cohort study
title_full Influences on catch-up growth using relative versus absolute metrics: evidence from the MAL-ED cohort study
title_fullStr Influences on catch-up growth using relative versus absolute metrics: evidence from the MAL-ED cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Influences on catch-up growth using relative versus absolute metrics: evidence from the MAL-ED cohort study
title_short Influences on catch-up growth using relative versus absolute metrics: evidence from the MAL-ED cohort study
title_sort influences on catch-up growth using relative versus absolute metrics: evidence from the mal-ed cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8240385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34187407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11120-0
work_keys_str_mv AT richardstephaniea influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy
AT mccormickbenjaminjj influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy
AT murraykolblaurae influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy
AT bessongpascal influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy
AT shresthasanjayak influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy
AT mdumaestomih influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy
AT ahmedtahmeed influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy
AT kanggagandeep influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy
AT leegwenytho influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy
AT seidmanjessicac influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy
AT svensenerling influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy
AT kosekmargaretn influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy
AT caulfieldlaurae influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy
AT influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy