Cargando…
Influences on catch-up growth using relative versus absolute metrics: evidence from the MAL-ED cohort study
BACKGROUND: Poor growth in early childhood has been considered irreversible after 2–3 years of age and has been associated with morbidity and mortality over the short-term and with poor economic and cognitive outcomes over the long-term. The MAL-ED cohort study was performed in eight low-income sett...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8240385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34187407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11120-0 |
_version_ | 1783715205991104512 |
---|---|
author | Richard, Stephanie A. McCormick, Benjamin J. J. Murray-Kolb, Laura E. Bessong, Pascal Shrestha, Sanjaya K. Mduma, Estomih Ahmed, Tahmeed Kang, Gagandeep Lee, Gwenyth O. Seidman, Jessica C. Svensen, Erling Kosek, Margaret N. Caulfield, Laura E. |
author_facet | Richard, Stephanie A. McCormick, Benjamin J. J. Murray-Kolb, Laura E. Bessong, Pascal Shrestha, Sanjaya K. Mduma, Estomih Ahmed, Tahmeed Kang, Gagandeep Lee, Gwenyth O. Seidman, Jessica C. Svensen, Erling Kosek, Margaret N. Caulfield, Laura E. |
author_sort | Richard, Stephanie A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Poor growth in early childhood has been considered irreversible after 2–3 years of age and has been associated with morbidity and mortality over the short-term and with poor economic and cognitive outcomes over the long-term. The MAL-ED cohort study was performed in eight low-income settings with the goal of evaluating relationships between the child’s environment and experience (dietary, illness, and pathogen exposure, among others) and their growth and development. The goal of this analysis is to determine whether there are differences in the factors associated with growth from 24 to 60 months using two different metrics. METHODS: Across six MAL-ED sites, 942 children had anthropometry data at 24 and 60 months, as well as information about socioeconomic status, maternal height, gut permeability (lactulose-mannitol z-score (LMZ)), dietary intake from 9 to 24 months, and micronutrient status. Anthropometric changes were in height- or weight-for-age z-score (HAZ, WAZ), their absolute difference from the growth standard median (HAD (cm), WAD (kg)), as well as recovery from stunting/underweight. Outcomes were modeled using multivariate regression. RESULTS: At 24 months, almost half of the cohort was stunted (45%) and 21% were underweight. Among those who were stunted at 24 months (n = 426), 185 (43%) were no longer stunted at 60 months. Most children increased their HAZ from 24 to 60 months (81%), whereas fewer (33%) had positive changes in their HAD. Linear regression models indicate that girls improved less than boys from 24 to 60 months (HAZ: -0.21 (95% CI -0.27, -0.15); HAD: -0.75 (-1.07, -0.43)). Greater intestinal permeability (higher LMZ) at 0–24 months was associated with lower relative and absolute changes from 24 to 60 months (HAZ: -0.10 (-0.16, -0.04); HAD: -0.47 (-0.73, -0.21)). Maternal height (per 10 cm) was positively associated with changes (HAZ: 0.09 (0.03, 0.15); HAD: 0.45 (0.15, 0.75)). Similar relationships were identified for changes in WAZ and WAD. CONCLUSIONS: The study children demonstrated improved growth from 24 to 60 months of age, but only a subset had positive changes in HAD and WAD. The same environmental factors were associated with growth from 24 to 60 months regardless of metric used (change in HAZ or HAD, or WAZ and WAD). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11120-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8240385 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82403852021-06-30 Influences on catch-up growth using relative versus absolute metrics: evidence from the MAL-ED cohort study Richard, Stephanie A. McCormick, Benjamin J. J. Murray-Kolb, Laura E. Bessong, Pascal Shrestha, Sanjaya K. Mduma, Estomih Ahmed, Tahmeed Kang, Gagandeep Lee, Gwenyth O. Seidman, Jessica C. Svensen, Erling Kosek, Margaret N. Caulfield, Laura E. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Poor growth in early childhood has been considered irreversible after 2–3 years of age and has been associated with morbidity and mortality over the short-term and with poor economic and cognitive outcomes over the long-term. The MAL-ED cohort study was performed in eight low-income settings with the goal of evaluating relationships between the child’s environment and experience (dietary, illness, and pathogen exposure, among others) and their growth and development. The goal of this analysis is to determine whether there are differences in the factors associated with growth from 24 to 60 months using two different metrics. METHODS: Across six MAL-ED sites, 942 children had anthropometry data at 24 and 60 months, as well as information about socioeconomic status, maternal height, gut permeability (lactulose-mannitol z-score (LMZ)), dietary intake from 9 to 24 months, and micronutrient status. Anthropometric changes were in height- or weight-for-age z-score (HAZ, WAZ), their absolute difference from the growth standard median (HAD (cm), WAD (kg)), as well as recovery from stunting/underweight. Outcomes were modeled using multivariate regression. RESULTS: At 24 months, almost half of the cohort was stunted (45%) and 21% were underweight. Among those who were stunted at 24 months (n = 426), 185 (43%) were no longer stunted at 60 months. Most children increased their HAZ from 24 to 60 months (81%), whereas fewer (33%) had positive changes in their HAD. Linear regression models indicate that girls improved less than boys from 24 to 60 months (HAZ: -0.21 (95% CI -0.27, -0.15); HAD: -0.75 (-1.07, -0.43)). Greater intestinal permeability (higher LMZ) at 0–24 months was associated with lower relative and absolute changes from 24 to 60 months (HAZ: -0.10 (-0.16, -0.04); HAD: -0.47 (-0.73, -0.21)). Maternal height (per 10 cm) was positively associated with changes (HAZ: 0.09 (0.03, 0.15); HAD: 0.45 (0.15, 0.75)). Similar relationships were identified for changes in WAZ and WAD. CONCLUSIONS: The study children demonstrated improved growth from 24 to 60 months of age, but only a subset had positive changes in HAD and WAD. The same environmental factors were associated with growth from 24 to 60 months regardless of metric used (change in HAZ or HAD, or WAZ and WAD). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11120-0. BioMed Central 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8240385/ /pubmed/34187407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11120-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Richard, Stephanie A. McCormick, Benjamin J. J. Murray-Kolb, Laura E. Bessong, Pascal Shrestha, Sanjaya K. Mduma, Estomih Ahmed, Tahmeed Kang, Gagandeep Lee, Gwenyth O. Seidman, Jessica C. Svensen, Erling Kosek, Margaret N. Caulfield, Laura E. Influences on catch-up growth using relative versus absolute metrics: evidence from the MAL-ED cohort study |
title | Influences on catch-up growth using relative versus absolute metrics: evidence from the MAL-ED cohort study |
title_full | Influences on catch-up growth using relative versus absolute metrics: evidence from the MAL-ED cohort study |
title_fullStr | Influences on catch-up growth using relative versus absolute metrics: evidence from the MAL-ED cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Influences on catch-up growth using relative versus absolute metrics: evidence from the MAL-ED cohort study |
title_short | Influences on catch-up growth using relative versus absolute metrics: evidence from the MAL-ED cohort study |
title_sort | influences on catch-up growth using relative versus absolute metrics: evidence from the mal-ed cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8240385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34187407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11120-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT richardstephaniea influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy AT mccormickbenjaminjj influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy AT murraykolblaurae influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy AT bessongpascal influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy AT shresthasanjayak influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy AT mdumaestomih influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy AT ahmedtahmeed influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy AT kanggagandeep influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy AT leegwenytho influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy AT seidmanjessicac influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy AT svensenerling influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy AT kosekmargaretn influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy AT caulfieldlaurae influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy AT influencesoncatchupgrowthusingrelativeversusabsolutemetricsevidencefromthemaledcohortstudy |