Cargando…

Impact of Varying Light and Dew on Ground Cover Estimates from Active NDVI, RGB, and LiDAR

Canopy ground cover (GC) is an important agronomic measure for evaluating crop establishment and early growth. This study evaluates the reliability of GC estimates, in the presence of varying light and dew on leaves, from three different ground-based sensors: (1) normalized difference vegetation ind...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deery, David M., Smith, David J., Davy, Robert, Jimenez-Berni, Jose A., Rebetzke, Greg J., James, Richard A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AAAS 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8240513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34250506
http://dx.doi.org/10.34133/2021/9842178
_version_ 1783715227511029760
author Deery, David M.
Smith, David J.
Davy, Robert
Jimenez-Berni, Jose A.
Rebetzke, Greg J.
James, Richard A.
author_facet Deery, David M.
Smith, David J.
Davy, Robert
Jimenez-Berni, Jose A.
Rebetzke, Greg J.
James, Richard A.
author_sort Deery, David M.
collection PubMed
description Canopy ground cover (GC) is an important agronomic measure for evaluating crop establishment and early growth. This study evaluates the reliability of GC estimates, in the presence of varying light and dew on leaves, from three different ground-based sensors: (1) normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) from the commercially available GreenSeeker®; (2) RGB images from a digital camera, where GC was determined as the portion of pixels from each image meeting a greenness criterion (i.e., (Green − Red)/(Green + Red) > 0); and (3) LiDAR using two separate approaches: (a) GC from LiDAR red reflectance (whereby red reflectance less than five was classified as vegetation) and (b) GC from LiDAR height (whereby height greater than 10 cm was classified as vegetation). Hourly measurements were made early in the season at two different growth stages (tillering and stem elongation), among wheat genotypes highly diverse for canopy characteristics. The active NDVI showed the least variation through time and was particularly stable, regardless of the available light or the presence of dew. In addition, between-sample-time Pearson correlations for NDVI were consistently high and significant (P < 0.0001), ranging from 0.89 to 0.98. In comparison, GC from LiDAR and RGB showed greater variation across sampling times, and LiDAR red reflectance was strongly influenced by the presence of dew. Excluding times when the light was exceedingly low, correlations between GC from RGB and NDVI were consistently high (ranging from 0.79 to 0.92). The high reliability of the active NDVI sensor potentially affords a high degree of flexibility for users by enabling sampling across a broad range of acceptable light conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8240513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AAAS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82405132021-07-08 Impact of Varying Light and Dew on Ground Cover Estimates from Active NDVI, RGB, and LiDAR Deery, David M. Smith, David J. Davy, Robert Jimenez-Berni, Jose A. Rebetzke, Greg J. James, Richard A. Plant Phenomics Research Article Canopy ground cover (GC) is an important agronomic measure for evaluating crop establishment and early growth. This study evaluates the reliability of GC estimates, in the presence of varying light and dew on leaves, from three different ground-based sensors: (1) normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) from the commercially available GreenSeeker®; (2) RGB images from a digital camera, where GC was determined as the portion of pixels from each image meeting a greenness criterion (i.e., (Green − Red)/(Green + Red) > 0); and (3) LiDAR using two separate approaches: (a) GC from LiDAR red reflectance (whereby red reflectance less than five was classified as vegetation) and (b) GC from LiDAR height (whereby height greater than 10 cm was classified as vegetation). Hourly measurements were made early in the season at two different growth stages (tillering and stem elongation), among wheat genotypes highly diverse for canopy characteristics. The active NDVI showed the least variation through time and was particularly stable, regardless of the available light or the presence of dew. In addition, between-sample-time Pearson correlations for NDVI were consistently high and significant (P < 0.0001), ranging from 0.89 to 0.98. In comparison, GC from LiDAR and RGB showed greater variation across sampling times, and LiDAR red reflectance was strongly influenced by the presence of dew. Excluding times when the light was exceedingly low, correlations between GC from RGB and NDVI were consistently high (ranging from 0.79 to 0.92). The high reliability of the active NDVI sensor potentially affords a high degree of flexibility for users by enabling sampling across a broad range of acceptable light conditions. AAAS 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8240513/ /pubmed/34250506 http://dx.doi.org/10.34133/2021/9842178 Text en Copyright © 2021 David M. Deery et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Exclusive Licensee Nanjing Agricultural University. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).
spellingShingle Research Article
Deery, David M.
Smith, David J.
Davy, Robert
Jimenez-Berni, Jose A.
Rebetzke, Greg J.
James, Richard A.
Impact of Varying Light and Dew on Ground Cover Estimates from Active NDVI, RGB, and LiDAR
title Impact of Varying Light and Dew on Ground Cover Estimates from Active NDVI, RGB, and LiDAR
title_full Impact of Varying Light and Dew on Ground Cover Estimates from Active NDVI, RGB, and LiDAR
title_fullStr Impact of Varying Light and Dew on Ground Cover Estimates from Active NDVI, RGB, and LiDAR
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Varying Light and Dew on Ground Cover Estimates from Active NDVI, RGB, and LiDAR
title_short Impact of Varying Light and Dew on Ground Cover Estimates from Active NDVI, RGB, and LiDAR
title_sort impact of varying light and dew on ground cover estimates from active ndvi, rgb, and lidar
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8240513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34250506
http://dx.doi.org/10.34133/2021/9842178
work_keys_str_mv AT deerydavidm impactofvaryinglightanddewongroundcoverestimatesfromactivendvirgbandlidar
AT smithdavidj impactofvaryinglightanddewongroundcoverestimatesfromactivendvirgbandlidar
AT davyrobert impactofvaryinglightanddewongroundcoverestimatesfromactivendvirgbandlidar
AT jimenezbernijosea impactofvaryinglightanddewongroundcoverestimatesfromactivendvirgbandlidar
AT rebetzkegregj impactofvaryinglightanddewongroundcoverestimatesfromactivendvirgbandlidar
AT jamesricharda impactofvaryinglightanddewongroundcoverestimatesfromactivendvirgbandlidar