Cargando…

Comparing Blanket vs. Selective Dry Cow Treatment Approaches for Elimination and Prevention of Intramammary Infections During the Dry Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A systematic review and a series of meta-analyses were conducted to investigate the efficacy of selective dry cow antimicrobial treatment (SDCT) (in which only infected quarters/cows were treated with an antimicrobial) compared with blanket dry cow treatment (BDCT) (all quarters/all cows received an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kabera, Fidèle, Roy, Jean-Philippe, Afifi, Mohamed, Godden, Sandra, Stryhn, Henrik, Sanchez, Javier, Dufour, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8240810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34212023
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.688450
_version_ 1783715279675588608
author Kabera, Fidèle
Roy, Jean-Philippe
Afifi, Mohamed
Godden, Sandra
Stryhn, Henrik
Sanchez, Javier
Dufour, Simon
author_facet Kabera, Fidèle
Roy, Jean-Philippe
Afifi, Mohamed
Godden, Sandra
Stryhn, Henrik
Sanchez, Javier
Dufour, Simon
author_sort Kabera, Fidèle
collection PubMed
description A systematic review and a series of meta-analyses were conducted to investigate the efficacy of selective dry cow antimicrobial treatment (SDCT) (in which only infected quarters/cows were treated with an antimicrobial) compared with blanket dry cow treatment (BDCT) (all quarters/all cows received an antimicrobial, regardless of their infection status). A full detailed protocol was published before initiating this review. Studies reporting on the (1) proportion of untreated quarters or cows when using SDCT, (2) intramammary infection (IMI) incidence risk over the dry period, (3) IMI elimination risk, (4) post-calving IMI prevalence, (5) early lactation clinical mastitis incidence, or (6) subsequent lactation milk yield and somatic cell counts were considered eligible. Thirteen articles representing 12 controlled trials, whether randomized or not, were available for analyses. SDCT reduced the use of antimicrobials at dry off by 66% (95% CI: 49–80). There was no difference in the elimination of existing IMI at dry off, between SDCT and BDCT. Meta-regression showed that the risk of IMI incidence during the dry period, IMI risk at calving, early lactation clinical mastitis risk, and early lactation milk yield and somatic cell counts did not differ between SDCT and BDCT as long as an internal teat sealant (65% bismuth subnitrate) was administered to untreated healthy quarters/cows at dry off. For trials not using internal teat sealants, SDCT resulted in higher risk than BDCT of acquiring a new IMI during the dry period and of harboring an IMI at calving. Lines of evidence strongly support that SDCT would reduce the use of antimicrobials at dry off, without any detrimental effect on udder health or milk production during the 1st months of the subsequent lactation, if, and only if, internal teat sealants are used for healthy, untreated quarters/cows.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8240810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82408102021-06-30 Comparing Blanket vs. Selective Dry Cow Treatment Approaches for Elimination and Prevention of Intramammary Infections During the Dry Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Kabera, Fidèle Roy, Jean-Philippe Afifi, Mohamed Godden, Sandra Stryhn, Henrik Sanchez, Javier Dufour, Simon Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science A systematic review and a series of meta-analyses were conducted to investigate the efficacy of selective dry cow antimicrobial treatment (SDCT) (in which only infected quarters/cows were treated with an antimicrobial) compared with blanket dry cow treatment (BDCT) (all quarters/all cows received an antimicrobial, regardless of their infection status). A full detailed protocol was published before initiating this review. Studies reporting on the (1) proportion of untreated quarters or cows when using SDCT, (2) intramammary infection (IMI) incidence risk over the dry period, (3) IMI elimination risk, (4) post-calving IMI prevalence, (5) early lactation clinical mastitis incidence, or (6) subsequent lactation milk yield and somatic cell counts were considered eligible. Thirteen articles representing 12 controlled trials, whether randomized or not, were available for analyses. SDCT reduced the use of antimicrobials at dry off by 66% (95% CI: 49–80). There was no difference in the elimination of existing IMI at dry off, between SDCT and BDCT. Meta-regression showed that the risk of IMI incidence during the dry period, IMI risk at calving, early lactation clinical mastitis risk, and early lactation milk yield and somatic cell counts did not differ between SDCT and BDCT as long as an internal teat sealant (65% bismuth subnitrate) was administered to untreated healthy quarters/cows at dry off. For trials not using internal teat sealants, SDCT resulted in higher risk than BDCT of acquiring a new IMI during the dry period and of harboring an IMI at calving. Lines of evidence strongly support that SDCT would reduce the use of antimicrobials at dry off, without any detrimental effect on udder health or milk production during the 1st months of the subsequent lactation, if, and only if, internal teat sealants are used for healthy, untreated quarters/cows. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8240810/ /pubmed/34212023 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.688450 Text en Copyright © 2021 Kabera, Roy, Afifi, Godden, Stryhn, Sanchez and Dufour. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Kabera, Fidèle
Roy, Jean-Philippe
Afifi, Mohamed
Godden, Sandra
Stryhn, Henrik
Sanchez, Javier
Dufour, Simon
Comparing Blanket vs. Selective Dry Cow Treatment Approaches for Elimination and Prevention of Intramammary Infections During the Dry Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Comparing Blanket vs. Selective Dry Cow Treatment Approaches for Elimination and Prevention of Intramammary Infections During the Dry Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparing Blanket vs. Selective Dry Cow Treatment Approaches for Elimination and Prevention of Intramammary Infections During the Dry Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparing Blanket vs. Selective Dry Cow Treatment Approaches for Elimination and Prevention of Intramammary Infections During the Dry Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Blanket vs. Selective Dry Cow Treatment Approaches for Elimination and Prevention of Intramammary Infections During the Dry Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparing Blanket vs. Selective Dry Cow Treatment Approaches for Elimination and Prevention of Intramammary Infections During the Dry Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparing blanket vs. selective dry cow treatment approaches for elimination and prevention of intramammary infections during the dry period: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8240810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34212023
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.688450
work_keys_str_mv AT kaberafidele comparingblanketvsselectivedrycowtreatmentapproachesforeliminationandpreventionofintramammaryinfectionsduringthedryperiodasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT royjeanphilippe comparingblanketvsselectivedrycowtreatmentapproachesforeliminationandpreventionofintramammaryinfectionsduringthedryperiodasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT afifimohamed comparingblanketvsselectivedrycowtreatmentapproachesforeliminationandpreventionofintramammaryinfectionsduringthedryperiodasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT goddensandra comparingblanketvsselectivedrycowtreatmentapproachesforeliminationandpreventionofintramammaryinfectionsduringthedryperiodasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT stryhnhenrik comparingblanketvsselectivedrycowtreatmentapproachesforeliminationandpreventionofintramammaryinfectionsduringthedryperiodasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sanchezjavier comparingblanketvsselectivedrycowtreatmentapproachesforeliminationandpreventionofintramammaryinfectionsduringthedryperiodasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dufoursimon comparingblanketvsselectivedrycowtreatmentapproachesforeliminationandpreventionofintramammaryinfectionsduringthedryperiodasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis