Cargando…

Retropupillary Iris-Claw Intraocular Lenses: A Literature Review

Retropupillary iris-claw intraocular lenses (ICIOLs) have been increasingly chosen by surgeons nowadays as a primary or secondary procedure of IOL implantation in eyes with insufficient capsular or zonular support. They have gained popularity due to their simple fast technique, favourable functional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Thulasidas, Mithun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8240859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34211261
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S321344
_version_ 1783715287997087744
author Thulasidas, Mithun
author_facet Thulasidas, Mithun
author_sort Thulasidas, Mithun
collection PubMed
description Retropupillary iris-claw intraocular lenses (ICIOLs) have been increasingly chosen by surgeons nowadays as a primary or secondary procedure of IOL implantation in eyes with insufficient capsular or zonular support. They have gained popularity due to their simple fast technique, favourable functional outcomes, and safety. The transition in the ICIOL fixation from prepupillary to a more biologically appropriate retropupillary position and change in the optic design from biconvex to convex–concave have provided better visual outcomes and improved safety. A peer-reviewed literature search was conducted in Medline (PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane Library using the keywords “retropupillary iris claw” and “iris claw”. The search yielded 310 articles that were screened. Forty-three articles on retropupillary ICIOLs were finally found to be relevant and reviewed in full-text versions. The functional outcomes following retropupillary implantation of ICIOLs have been acceptable in eyes with no ocular co-morbidities otherwise. However, the indications for surgery may affect the outcomes. The major postoperative complications directly associated with ICIOLs include pupil ovalization and redislocation. Nevertheless, the rate of disenclavation depends on the experience and skill of the surgeon. This review is based on a literature review, and it focuses on the preoperative evaluation, surgical technique, postoperative outcomes, and associated complications. Prospective randomized trials with a larger sample size and longer follow-up are needed for comparison with other techniques of IOL fixation and confirmation of long-term safety profile.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8240859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82408592021-06-30 Retropupillary Iris-Claw Intraocular Lenses: A Literature Review Thulasidas, Mithun Clin Ophthalmol Review Retropupillary iris-claw intraocular lenses (ICIOLs) have been increasingly chosen by surgeons nowadays as a primary or secondary procedure of IOL implantation in eyes with insufficient capsular or zonular support. They have gained popularity due to their simple fast technique, favourable functional outcomes, and safety. The transition in the ICIOL fixation from prepupillary to a more biologically appropriate retropupillary position and change in the optic design from biconvex to convex–concave have provided better visual outcomes and improved safety. A peer-reviewed literature search was conducted in Medline (PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane Library using the keywords “retropupillary iris claw” and “iris claw”. The search yielded 310 articles that were screened. Forty-three articles on retropupillary ICIOLs were finally found to be relevant and reviewed in full-text versions. The functional outcomes following retropupillary implantation of ICIOLs have been acceptable in eyes with no ocular co-morbidities otherwise. However, the indications for surgery may affect the outcomes. The major postoperative complications directly associated with ICIOLs include pupil ovalization and redislocation. Nevertheless, the rate of disenclavation depends on the experience and skill of the surgeon. This review is based on a literature review, and it focuses on the preoperative evaluation, surgical technique, postoperative outcomes, and associated complications. Prospective randomized trials with a larger sample size and longer follow-up are needed for comparison with other techniques of IOL fixation and confirmation of long-term safety profile. Dove 2021-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8240859/ /pubmed/34211261 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S321344 Text en © 2021 Thulasidas. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Thulasidas, Mithun
Retropupillary Iris-Claw Intraocular Lenses: A Literature Review
title Retropupillary Iris-Claw Intraocular Lenses: A Literature Review
title_full Retropupillary Iris-Claw Intraocular Lenses: A Literature Review
title_fullStr Retropupillary Iris-Claw Intraocular Lenses: A Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Retropupillary Iris-Claw Intraocular Lenses: A Literature Review
title_short Retropupillary Iris-Claw Intraocular Lenses: A Literature Review
title_sort retropupillary iris-claw intraocular lenses: a literature review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8240859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34211261
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S321344
work_keys_str_mv AT thulasidasmithun retropupillaryirisclawintraocularlensesaliteraturereview