Cargando…

Dosimetric Comparison of Robotic and Linear Accelerator Multi-Leaf Collimator-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Arteriovenous Malformation

PURPOSE: To investigate the dosimetric comparison of different collimators which are used in robotic radiosurgery (cyberknife-CK) and linear accelerator (LINAC) for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in arteriovenous malformation (AVM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five AVM patients were planned in CK...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaliyaperumal, Venkatesan, Abraham, Susan, Veni, Maragatha, Banerjee, Susovan, Tamilselvan, S, Gupta, Deepak, Dayanithi, K., Manigandan, D., Mishra, Saumyaranjan, Bisht, Shyam Singh, Kataria, Tejinder
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8240906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34267485
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_79_20
_version_ 1783715296182272000
author Kaliyaperumal, Venkatesan
Abraham, Susan
Veni, Maragatha
Banerjee, Susovan
Tamilselvan, S
Gupta, Deepak
Dayanithi, K.
Manigandan, D.
Mishra, Saumyaranjan
Bisht, Shyam Singh
Kataria, Tejinder
author_facet Kaliyaperumal, Venkatesan
Abraham, Susan
Veni, Maragatha
Banerjee, Susovan
Tamilselvan, S
Gupta, Deepak
Dayanithi, K.
Manigandan, D.
Mishra, Saumyaranjan
Bisht, Shyam Singh
Kataria, Tejinder
author_sort Kaliyaperumal, Venkatesan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the dosimetric comparison of different collimators which are used in robotic radiosurgery (cyberknife-CK) and linear accelerator (LINAC) for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in arteriovenous malformation (AVM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five AVM patients were planned in CK using FIXED cone, IRIS collimator, and multi-leaf collimator (MLC) based in LINAC. Dosimetric comparison was performed using Paddick conformity index (CI(Paddick)) and International Commission on Radiation Units and measurements (ICRU) homogeneity index (HI(ICRU)), gradient score (GS), normal brain dose received by 10cc (D(10cc)) and critical structure (brain stem, optic chiasma, optic nerves) doses. Paired sample t-test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Mean treatment volume was 3.16cc (standard deviation ± 4.91cc). No significant deviation (P =0.45, 0.237 for FIXED vs. IRIS and FIXED vs. MLC, respectively) was found in target coverage. For CI(Paddick), the mean difference (MD) between FIXED- and MLC-based plans was 0.16(P = 0.001); For HI(ICRU), difference between FIXED and IRIS was insignificant (0.5, P = 0.823); but, when FIXED versus MLC, the deviation was 7.99% (P = 0.002). In FIXED- and MLC-based plans, significant difference was found in GS70 and GS40 (P < 0.041 and 0.005, respectively). MD between FIXED- and MLC-based plans for normal brain for 5Gy, 10Gy, 12Gy, and 20Gy were 36.08cc (P = 0.009), 7.12cc (P = 0.000), 5.84cc (P = 0.000) and 1.56cc (P = 0.000), respectively. AVM volume <0.7cc should be treated with CK FIXED and >0.7cc were treated by using FIXED or IRIS collimators. AVM volume > 1.4cc can be treated by either LINAC MLC-based SRS or CK. CONCLUSION: Our study shows CK collimator (IRIS and FIXED) could be able to treat brain AVMs in any size. Linac MLC-based SRS has some limitations in terms of conformity and low-dose spillage, and advantages like reduced treatment time and MU.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8240906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82409062021-07-14 Dosimetric Comparison of Robotic and Linear Accelerator Multi-Leaf Collimator-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Arteriovenous Malformation Kaliyaperumal, Venkatesan Abraham, Susan Veni, Maragatha Banerjee, Susovan Tamilselvan, S Gupta, Deepak Dayanithi, K. Manigandan, D. Mishra, Saumyaranjan Bisht, Shyam Singh Kataria, Tejinder J Med Phys Original Article PURPOSE: To investigate the dosimetric comparison of different collimators which are used in robotic radiosurgery (cyberknife-CK) and linear accelerator (LINAC) for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in arteriovenous malformation (AVM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five AVM patients were planned in CK using FIXED cone, IRIS collimator, and multi-leaf collimator (MLC) based in LINAC. Dosimetric comparison was performed using Paddick conformity index (CI(Paddick)) and International Commission on Radiation Units and measurements (ICRU) homogeneity index (HI(ICRU)), gradient score (GS), normal brain dose received by 10cc (D(10cc)) and critical structure (brain stem, optic chiasma, optic nerves) doses. Paired sample t-test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Mean treatment volume was 3.16cc (standard deviation ± 4.91cc). No significant deviation (P =0.45, 0.237 for FIXED vs. IRIS and FIXED vs. MLC, respectively) was found in target coverage. For CI(Paddick), the mean difference (MD) between FIXED- and MLC-based plans was 0.16(P = 0.001); For HI(ICRU), difference between FIXED and IRIS was insignificant (0.5, P = 0.823); but, when FIXED versus MLC, the deviation was 7.99% (P = 0.002). In FIXED- and MLC-based plans, significant difference was found in GS70 and GS40 (P < 0.041 and 0.005, respectively). MD between FIXED- and MLC-based plans for normal brain for 5Gy, 10Gy, 12Gy, and 20Gy were 36.08cc (P = 0.009), 7.12cc (P = 0.000), 5.84cc (P = 0.000) and 1.56cc (P = 0.000), respectively. AVM volume <0.7cc should be treated with CK FIXED and >0.7cc were treated by using FIXED or IRIS collimators. AVM volume > 1.4cc can be treated by either LINAC MLC-based SRS or CK. CONCLUSION: Our study shows CK collimator (IRIS and FIXED) could be able to treat brain AVMs in any size. Linac MLC-based SRS has some limitations in terms of conformity and low-dose spillage, and advantages like reduced treatment time and MU. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8240906/ /pubmed/34267485 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_79_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Medical Physics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kaliyaperumal, Venkatesan
Abraham, Susan
Veni, Maragatha
Banerjee, Susovan
Tamilselvan, S
Gupta, Deepak
Dayanithi, K.
Manigandan, D.
Mishra, Saumyaranjan
Bisht, Shyam Singh
Kataria, Tejinder
Dosimetric Comparison of Robotic and Linear Accelerator Multi-Leaf Collimator-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Arteriovenous Malformation
title Dosimetric Comparison of Robotic and Linear Accelerator Multi-Leaf Collimator-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Arteriovenous Malformation
title_full Dosimetric Comparison of Robotic and Linear Accelerator Multi-Leaf Collimator-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Arteriovenous Malformation
title_fullStr Dosimetric Comparison of Robotic and Linear Accelerator Multi-Leaf Collimator-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Arteriovenous Malformation
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric Comparison of Robotic and Linear Accelerator Multi-Leaf Collimator-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Arteriovenous Malformation
title_short Dosimetric Comparison of Robotic and Linear Accelerator Multi-Leaf Collimator-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Arteriovenous Malformation
title_sort dosimetric comparison of robotic and linear accelerator multi-leaf collimator-based stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8240906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34267485
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_79_20
work_keys_str_mv AT kaliyaperumalvenkatesan dosimetriccomparisonofroboticandlinearacceleratormultileafcollimatorbasedstereotacticradiosurgeryforarteriovenousmalformation
AT abrahamsusan dosimetriccomparisonofroboticandlinearacceleratormultileafcollimatorbasedstereotacticradiosurgeryforarteriovenousmalformation
AT venimaragatha dosimetriccomparisonofroboticandlinearacceleratormultileafcollimatorbasedstereotacticradiosurgeryforarteriovenousmalformation
AT banerjeesusovan dosimetriccomparisonofroboticandlinearacceleratormultileafcollimatorbasedstereotacticradiosurgeryforarteriovenousmalformation
AT tamilselvans dosimetriccomparisonofroboticandlinearacceleratormultileafcollimatorbasedstereotacticradiosurgeryforarteriovenousmalformation
AT guptadeepak dosimetriccomparisonofroboticandlinearacceleratormultileafcollimatorbasedstereotacticradiosurgeryforarteriovenousmalformation
AT dayanithik dosimetriccomparisonofroboticandlinearacceleratormultileafcollimatorbasedstereotacticradiosurgeryforarteriovenousmalformation
AT manigandand dosimetriccomparisonofroboticandlinearacceleratormultileafcollimatorbasedstereotacticradiosurgeryforarteriovenousmalformation
AT mishrasaumyaranjan dosimetriccomparisonofroboticandlinearacceleratormultileafcollimatorbasedstereotacticradiosurgeryforarteriovenousmalformation
AT bishtshyamsingh dosimetriccomparisonofroboticandlinearacceleratormultileafcollimatorbasedstereotacticradiosurgeryforarteriovenousmalformation
AT katariatejinder dosimetriccomparisonofroboticandlinearacceleratormultileafcollimatorbasedstereotacticradiosurgeryforarteriovenousmalformation