Cargando…

Dosimetric Evaluation of Simplified Knowledge-Based Plan with an Extensive Stepping Validation Approach in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy-Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer

PURPOSE: We investigated the performance of the simplified knowledge-based plans (KBPs) in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 50 cases who underwent SBRT, only three structures were registered into knowledge-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wada, Yutaro, Monzen, Hajime, Tamura, Mikoto, Otsuka, Masakazu, Inada, Masahiro, Ishikawa, Kazuki, Doi, Hiroshi, Nakamatsu, Kiyoshi, Nishimura, Yasumasa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8240912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34267484
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_67_20
_version_ 1783715297678589952
author Wada, Yutaro
Monzen, Hajime
Tamura, Mikoto
Otsuka, Masakazu
Inada, Masahiro
Ishikawa, Kazuki
Doi, Hiroshi
Nakamatsu, Kiyoshi
Nishimura, Yasumasa
author_facet Wada, Yutaro
Monzen, Hajime
Tamura, Mikoto
Otsuka, Masakazu
Inada, Masahiro
Ishikawa, Kazuki
Doi, Hiroshi
Nakamatsu, Kiyoshi
Nishimura, Yasumasa
author_sort Wada, Yutaro
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We investigated the performance of the simplified knowledge-based plans (KBPs) in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 50 cases who underwent SBRT, only three structures were registered into knowledge-based model: total lung, spinal cord, and planning target volume. We performed single auto-optimization on VMAT plans in two steps: 19 cases used for the model training (closed-loop validation) and 16 new cases outside of training set (open-loop validation) for TrueBeam (TB) and Halcyon (Hal) linacs. The dosimetric parameters were compared between clinical plans (CLPs) and KBPs: CLP(closed), KBP(closed)-TB and KBP(closed)-Hal in closed-loop validation, CLP(open), KBP(open)-TB and KBP(open)-Hal in open-loop validation. RESULTS: All organs at risk were comparable between CLPs and KBPs except for contralateral lung: V(5) of KBPs was approximately 3%–7% higher than that of CLPs. V(20) of total lung for KBPs showed comparable to CLPs; CLP(closed) vs. KBP(closed)-TB and CLP(closed) vs. KBP(closed)-Hal: 4.36% ± 2.87% vs. 3.54% ± 1.95% and 4.36 ± 2.87% vs. 3.54% ± 1.94% (P = 0.54 and 0.54); CLP(open) vs. KBP(open)-TB and CLP(open) vs. KBP(open)-Hal: 4.18% ± 1.57% vs. 3.55% ± 1.27% and 4.18% ± 1.57% vs. 3.67% ± 1.26% (P = 0.19 and 0.27). CI(95) of KBPs with both linacs was superior to that of the CLP in closed-loop validation: CLP(closed) vs. KBP(closed)-TB vs. KBP(closed)-Hal: 1.32% ± 0.12% vs. 1.18% ± 0.09% vs. 1.17% ± 0.06% (P < 0.01); and open-loop validation: CLP(open) vs. KBP(open)-TB vs. KBP(open)-Hal: 1.22% ± 0.09% vs. 1.14% ± 0.04% vs. 1.16% ± 0.05% (P ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The simplified KBPs with limited number of structures and without planner intervention were clinically acceptable in the dosimetric parameters for lung VMAT-SBRT planning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8240912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82409122021-07-14 Dosimetric Evaluation of Simplified Knowledge-Based Plan with an Extensive Stepping Validation Approach in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy-Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer Wada, Yutaro Monzen, Hajime Tamura, Mikoto Otsuka, Masakazu Inada, Masahiro Ishikawa, Kazuki Doi, Hiroshi Nakamatsu, Kiyoshi Nishimura, Yasumasa J Med Phys Original Article PURPOSE: We investigated the performance of the simplified knowledge-based plans (KBPs) in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 50 cases who underwent SBRT, only three structures were registered into knowledge-based model: total lung, spinal cord, and planning target volume. We performed single auto-optimization on VMAT plans in two steps: 19 cases used for the model training (closed-loop validation) and 16 new cases outside of training set (open-loop validation) for TrueBeam (TB) and Halcyon (Hal) linacs. The dosimetric parameters were compared between clinical plans (CLPs) and KBPs: CLP(closed), KBP(closed)-TB and KBP(closed)-Hal in closed-loop validation, CLP(open), KBP(open)-TB and KBP(open)-Hal in open-loop validation. RESULTS: All organs at risk were comparable between CLPs and KBPs except for contralateral lung: V(5) of KBPs was approximately 3%–7% higher than that of CLPs. V(20) of total lung for KBPs showed comparable to CLPs; CLP(closed) vs. KBP(closed)-TB and CLP(closed) vs. KBP(closed)-Hal: 4.36% ± 2.87% vs. 3.54% ± 1.95% and 4.36 ± 2.87% vs. 3.54% ± 1.94% (P = 0.54 and 0.54); CLP(open) vs. KBP(open)-TB and CLP(open) vs. KBP(open)-Hal: 4.18% ± 1.57% vs. 3.55% ± 1.27% and 4.18% ± 1.57% vs. 3.67% ± 1.26% (P = 0.19 and 0.27). CI(95) of KBPs with both linacs was superior to that of the CLP in closed-loop validation: CLP(closed) vs. KBP(closed)-TB vs. KBP(closed)-Hal: 1.32% ± 0.12% vs. 1.18% ± 0.09% vs. 1.17% ± 0.06% (P < 0.01); and open-loop validation: CLP(open) vs. KBP(open)-TB vs. KBP(open)-Hal: 1.22% ± 0.09% vs. 1.14% ± 0.04% vs. 1.16% ± 0.05% (P ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The simplified KBPs with limited number of structures and without planner intervention were clinically acceptable in the dosimetric parameters for lung VMAT-SBRT planning. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8240912/ /pubmed/34267484 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_67_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Medical Physics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Wada, Yutaro
Monzen, Hajime
Tamura, Mikoto
Otsuka, Masakazu
Inada, Masahiro
Ishikawa, Kazuki
Doi, Hiroshi
Nakamatsu, Kiyoshi
Nishimura, Yasumasa
Dosimetric Evaluation of Simplified Knowledge-Based Plan with an Extensive Stepping Validation Approach in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy-Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer
title Dosimetric Evaluation of Simplified Knowledge-Based Plan with an Extensive Stepping Validation Approach in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy-Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer
title_full Dosimetric Evaluation of Simplified Knowledge-Based Plan with an Extensive Stepping Validation Approach in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy-Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer
title_fullStr Dosimetric Evaluation of Simplified Knowledge-Based Plan with an Extensive Stepping Validation Approach in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy-Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric Evaluation of Simplified Knowledge-Based Plan with an Extensive Stepping Validation Approach in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy-Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer
title_short Dosimetric Evaluation of Simplified Knowledge-Based Plan with an Extensive Stepping Validation Approach in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy-Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer
title_sort dosimetric evaluation of simplified knowledge-based plan with an extensive stepping validation approach in volumetric-modulated arc therapy-stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8240912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34267484
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_67_20
work_keys_str_mv AT wadayutaro dosimetricevaluationofsimplifiedknowledgebasedplanwithanextensivesteppingvalidationapproachinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapystereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlungcancer
AT monzenhajime dosimetricevaluationofsimplifiedknowledgebasedplanwithanextensivesteppingvalidationapproachinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapystereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlungcancer
AT tamuramikoto dosimetricevaluationofsimplifiedknowledgebasedplanwithanextensivesteppingvalidationapproachinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapystereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlungcancer
AT otsukamasakazu dosimetricevaluationofsimplifiedknowledgebasedplanwithanextensivesteppingvalidationapproachinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapystereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlungcancer
AT inadamasahiro dosimetricevaluationofsimplifiedknowledgebasedplanwithanextensivesteppingvalidationapproachinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapystereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlungcancer
AT ishikawakazuki dosimetricevaluationofsimplifiedknowledgebasedplanwithanextensivesteppingvalidationapproachinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapystereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlungcancer
AT doihiroshi dosimetricevaluationofsimplifiedknowledgebasedplanwithanextensivesteppingvalidationapproachinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapystereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlungcancer
AT nakamatsukiyoshi dosimetricevaluationofsimplifiedknowledgebasedplanwithanextensivesteppingvalidationapproachinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapystereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlungcancer
AT nishimurayasumasa dosimetricevaluationofsimplifiedknowledgebasedplanwithanextensivesteppingvalidationapproachinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapystereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlungcancer