Cargando…
Dosimetric Evaluation of Simplified Knowledge-Based Plan with an Extensive Stepping Validation Approach in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy-Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer
PURPOSE: We investigated the performance of the simplified knowledge-based plans (KBPs) in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 50 cases who underwent SBRT, only three structures were registered into knowledge-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8240912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34267484 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_67_20 |
_version_ | 1783715297678589952 |
---|---|
author | Wada, Yutaro Monzen, Hajime Tamura, Mikoto Otsuka, Masakazu Inada, Masahiro Ishikawa, Kazuki Doi, Hiroshi Nakamatsu, Kiyoshi Nishimura, Yasumasa |
author_facet | Wada, Yutaro Monzen, Hajime Tamura, Mikoto Otsuka, Masakazu Inada, Masahiro Ishikawa, Kazuki Doi, Hiroshi Nakamatsu, Kiyoshi Nishimura, Yasumasa |
author_sort | Wada, Yutaro |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: We investigated the performance of the simplified knowledge-based plans (KBPs) in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 50 cases who underwent SBRT, only three structures were registered into knowledge-based model: total lung, spinal cord, and planning target volume. We performed single auto-optimization on VMAT plans in two steps: 19 cases used for the model training (closed-loop validation) and 16 new cases outside of training set (open-loop validation) for TrueBeam (TB) and Halcyon (Hal) linacs. The dosimetric parameters were compared between clinical plans (CLPs) and KBPs: CLP(closed), KBP(closed)-TB and KBP(closed)-Hal in closed-loop validation, CLP(open), KBP(open)-TB and KBP(open)-Hal in open-loop validation. RESULTS: All organs at risk were comparable between CLPs and KBPs except for contralateral lung: V(5) of KBPs was approximately 3%–7% higher than that of CLPs. V(20) of total lung for KBPs showed comparable to CLPs; CLP(closed) vs. KBP(closed)-TB and CLP(closed) vs. KBP(closed)-Hal: 4.36% ± 2.87% vs. 3.54% ± 1.95% and 4.36 ± 2.87% vs. 3.54% ± 1.94% (P = 0.54 and 0.54); CLP(open) vs. KBP(open)-TB and CLP(open) vs. KBP(open)-Hal: 4.18% ± 1.57% vs. 3.55% ± 1.27% and 4.18% ± 1.57% vs. 3.67% ± 1.26% (P = 0.19 and 0.27). CI(95) of KBPs with both linacs was superior to that of the CLP in closed-loop validation: CLP(closed) vs. KBP(closed)-TB vs. KBP(closed)-Hal: 1.32% ± 0.12% vs. 1.18% ± 0.09% vs. 1.17% ± 0.06% (P < 0.01); and open-loop validation: CLP(open) vs. KBP(open)-TB vs. KBP(open)-Hal: 1.22% ± 0.09% vs. 1.14% ± 0.04% vs. 1.16% ± 0.05% (P ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The simplified KBPs with limited number of structures and without planner intervention were clinically acceptable in the dosimetric parameters for lung VMAT-SBRT planning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8240912 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82409122021-07-14 Dosimetric Evaluation of Simplified Knowledge-Based Plan with an Extensive Stepping Validation Approach in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy-Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer Wada, Yutaro Monzen, Hajime Tamura, Mikoto Otsuka, Masakazu Inada, Masahiro Ishikawa, Kazuki Doi, Hiroshi Nakamatsu, Kiyoshi Nishimura, Yasumasa J Med Phys Original Article PURPOSE: We investigated the performance of the simplified knowledge-based plans (KBPs) in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 50 cases who underwent SBRT, only three structures were registered into knowledge-based model: total lung, spinal cord, and planning target volume. We performed single auto-optimization on VMAT plans in two steps: 19 cases used for the model training (closed-loop validation) and 16 new cases outside of training set (open-loop validation) for TrueBeam (TB) and Halcyon (Hal) linacs. The dosimetric parameters were compared between clinical plans (CLPs) and KBPs: CLP(closed), KBP(closed)-TB and KBP(closed)-Hal in closed-loop validation, CLP(open), KBP(open)-TB and KBP(open)-Hal in open-loop validation. RESULTS: All organs at risk were comparable between CLPs and KBPs except for contralateral lung: V(5) of KBPs was approximately 3%–7% higher than that of CLPs. V(20) of total lung for KBPs showed comparable to CLPs; CLP(closed) vs. KBP(closed)-TB and CLP(closed) vs. KBP(closed)-Hal: 4.36% ± 2.87% vs. 3.54% ± 1.95% and 4.36 ± 2.87% vs. 3.54% ± 1.94% (P = 0.54 and 0.54); CLP(open) vs. KBP(open)-TB and CLP(open) vs. KBP(open)-Hal: 4.18% ± 1.57% vs. 3.55% ± 1.27% and 4.18% ± 1.57% vs. 3.67% ± 1.26% (P = 0.19 and 0.27). CI(95) of KBPs with both linacs was superior to that of the CLP in closed-loop validation: CLP(closed) vs. KBP(closed)-TB vs. KBP(closed)-Hal: 1.32% ± 0.12% vs. 1.18% ± 0.09% vs. 1.17% ± 0.06% (P < 0.01); and open-loop validation: CLP(open) vs. KBP(open)-TB vs. KBP(open)-Hal: 1.22% ± 0.09% vs. 1.14% ± 0.04% vs. 1.16% ± 0.05% (P ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The simplified KBPs with limited number of structures and without planner intervention were clinically acceptable in the dosimetric parameters for lung VMAT-SBRT planning. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8240912/ /pubmed/34267484 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_67_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Medical Physics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wada, Yutaro Monzen, Hajime Tamura, Mikoto Otsuka, Masakazu Inada, Masahiro Ishikawa, Kazuki Doi, Hiroshi Nakamatsu, Kiyoshi Nishimura, Yasumasa Dosimetric Evaluation of Simplified Knowledge-Based Plan with an Extensive Stepping Validation Approach in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy-Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer |
title | Dosimetric Evaluation of Simplified Knowledge-Based Plan with an Extensive Stepping Validation Approach in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy-Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer |
title_full | Dosimetric Evaluation of Simplified Knowledge-Based Plan with an Extensive Stepping Validation Approach in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy-Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer |
title_fullStr | Dosimetric Evaluation of Simplified Knowledge-Based Plan with an Extensive Stepping Validation Approach in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy-Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Dosimetric Evaluation of Simplified Knowledge-Based Plan with an Extensive Stepping Validation Approach in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy-Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer |
title_short | Dosimetric Evaluation of Simplified Knowledge-Based Plan with an Extensive Stepping Validation Approach in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy-Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer |
title_sort | dosimetric evaluation of simplified knowledge-based plan with an extensive stepping validation approach in volumetric-modulated arc therapy-stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8240912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34267484 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_67_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wadayutaro dosimetricevaluationofsimplifiedknowledgebasedplanwithanextensivesteppingvalidationapproachinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapystereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlungcancer AT monzenhajime dosimetricevaluationofsimplifiedknowledgebasedplanwithanextensivesteppingvalidationapproachinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapystereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlungcancer AT tamuramikoto dosimetricevaluationofsimplifiedknowledgebasedplanwithanextensivesteppingvalidationapproachinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapystereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlungcancer AT otsukamasakazu dosimetricevaluationofsimplifiedknowledgebasedplanwithanextensivesteppingvalidationapproachinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapystereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlungcancer AT inadamasahiro dosimetricevaluationofsimplifiedknowledgebasedplanwithanextensivesteppingvalidationapproachinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapystereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlungcancer AT ishikawakazuki dosimetricevaluationofsimplifiedknowledgebasedplanwithanextensivesteppingvalidationapproachinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapystereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlungcancer AT doihiroshi dosimetricevaluationofsimplifiedknowledgebasedplanwithanextensivesteppingvalidationapproachinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapystereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlungcancer AT nakamatsukiyoshi dosimetricevaluationofsimplifiedknowledgebasedplanwithanextensivesteppingvalidationapproachinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapystereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlungcancer AT nishimurayasumasa dosimetricevaluationofsimplifiedknowledgebasedplanwithanextensivesteppingvalidationapproachinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapystereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlungcancer |