Cargando…

Comparative Assessment of Peritoneal Membrane Characteristics in Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Using Standard Peritoneal Equilibration Test and Fast Peritoneal Equilibration Test

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of peritoneal membrane permeability in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is crucial in prescribing treatment regimens. This study evaluated peritoneal membrane characteristics in patients on CAPD using standard peritoneal equilibration test (PET) and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Aman, Deshpande, Pradeep, Sridhar, G., Ramashankar, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8240934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34267434
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijn.IJN_386_19
_version_ 1783715302830243840
author Gupta, Aman
Deshpande, Pradeep
Sridhar, G.
Ramashankar, J.
author_facet Gupta, Aman
Deshpande, Pradeep
Sridhar, G.
Ramashankar, J.
author_sort Gupta, Aman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evaluation of peritoneal membrane permeability in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is crucial in prescribing treatment regimens. This study evaluated peritoneal membrane characteristics in patients on CAPD using standard peritoneal equilibration test (PET) and fast PET. METHODS: A prospective observational longitudinal study included patients on CAPD with no symptoms of peritonitis for at least 4 weeks before the PET. Both, standard and fast PET were performed using 2.5% glucose-containing dialysate. The dialysate and plasma (D/P) creatinine ratios at each time point (i.e., 0 h, 2(nd) h, and 4(th) h) in standard and at 4(th) hour only in fast PET were determined. Patients were classified according to D/P creatinine value as high, high-average, low-average, low transporter. The follow-up period was 6 months and changes in membrane characteristics were compared again to revalidate the efficacy of fast PET. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients between 41 and 70 years of age were enrolled. The majority had diabetic nephropathy (40%) and chronic glomerulonephritis (28%). Based on transport type, a significant positive correlation was observed between the D/P creatinine ratio of baseline standard PET I and fast PET I (r = 0.992, P ≤ 0.05) and standard PET II and fast PET II (r = 0.969, P ≤ 0.05) done after 6 months. The results of the PET and transport category after 6 months were similar in 82% cases determined by fast PET and 98% cases determined by the standard pet. There was significant agreement between both the methods of PET (K value = 0.872, P < 0.001). A significant (P ≤ 0.001) correlation was observed between standard PET I and standard PET II transport status. CONCLUSION: Fast PET is a good alternative for assessing peritoneal membrane characteristics especially in the setting of less availability of resources and is a less cumbersome procedure as compared to standard PET.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8240934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82409342021-07-14 Comparative Assessment of Peritoneal Membrane Characteristics in Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Using Standard Peritoneal Equilibration Test and Fast Peritoneal Equilibration Test Gupta, Aman Deshpande, Pradeep Sridhar, G. Ramashankar, J. Indian J Nephrol Original Article BACKGROUND: Evaluation of peritoneal membrane permeability in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is crucial in prescribing treatment regimens. This study evaluated peritoneal membrane characteristics in patients on CAPD using standard peritoneal equilibration test (PET) and fast PET. METHODS: A prospective observational longitudinal study included patients on CAPD with no symptoms of peritonitis for at least 4 weeks before the PET. Both, standard and fast PET were performed using 2.5% glucose-containing dialysate. The dialysate and plasma (D/P) creatinine ratios at each time point (i.e., 0 h, 2(nd) h, and 4(th) h) in standard and at 4(th) hour only in fast PET were determined. Patients were classified according to D/P creatinine value as high, high-average, low-average, low transporter. The follow-up period was 6 months and changes in membrane characteristics were compared again to revalidate the efficacy of fast PET. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients between 41 and 70 years of age were enrolled. The majority had diabetic nephropathy (40%) and chronic glomerulonephritis (28%). Based on transport type, a significant positive correlation was observed between the D/P creatinine ratio of baseline standard PET I and fast PET I (r = 0.992, P ≤ 0.05) and standard PET II and fast PET II (r = 0.969, P ≤ 0.05) done after 6 months. The results of the PET and transport category after 6 months were similar in 82% cases determined by fast PET and 98% cases determined by the standard pet. There was significant agreement between both the methods of PET (K value = 0.872, P < 0.001). A significant (P ≤ 0.001) correlation was observed between standard PET I and standard PET II transport status. CONCLUSION: Fast PET is a good alternative for assessing peritoneal membrane characteristics especially in the setting of less availability of resources and is a less cumbersome procedure as compared to standard PET. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8240934/ /pubmed/34267434 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijn.IJN_386_19 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Indian Journal of Nephrology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gupta, Aman
Deshpande, Pradeep
Sridhar, G.
Ramashankar, J.
Comparative Assessment of Peritoneal Membrane Characteristics in Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Using Standard Peritoneal Equilibration Test and Fast Peritoneal Equilibration Test
title Comparative Assessment of Peritoneal Membrane Characteristics in Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Using Standard Peritoneal Equilibration Test and Fast Peritoneal Equilibration Test
title_full Comparative Assessment of Peritoneal Membrane Characteristics in Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Using Standard Peritoneal Equilibration Test and Fast Peritoneal Equilibration Test
title_fullStr Comparative Assessment of Peritoneal Membrane Characteristics in Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Using Standard Peritoneal Equilibration Test and Fast Peritoneal Equilibration Test
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Assessment of Peritoneal Membrane Characteristics in Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Using Standard Peritoneal Equilibration Test and Fast Peritoneal Equilibration Test
title_short Comparative Assessment of Peritoneal Membrane Characteristics in Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Using Standard Peritoneal Equilibration Test and Fast Peritoneal Equilibration Test
title_sort comparative assessment of peritoneal membrane characteristics in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis using standard peritoneal equilibration test and fast peritoneal equilibration test
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8240934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34267434
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijn.IJN_386_19
work_keys_str_mv AT guptaaman comparativeassessmentofperitonealmembranecharacteristicsinpatientsoncontinuousambulatoryperitonealdialysisusingstandardperitonealequilibrationtestandfastperitonealequilibrationtest
AT deshpandepradeep comparativeassessmentofperitonealmembranecharacteristicsinpatientsoncontinuousambulatoryperitonealdialysisusingstandardperitonealequilibrationtestandfastperitonealequilibrationtest
AT sridharg comparativeassessmentofperitonealmembranecharacteristicsinpatientsoncontinuousambulatoryperitonealdialysisusingstandardperitonealequilibrationtestandfastperitonealequilibrationtest
AT ramashankarj comparativeassessmentofperitonealmembranecharacteristicsinpatientsoncontinuousambulatoryperitonealdialysisusingstandardperitonealequilibrationtestandfastperitonealequilibrationtest