Cargando…
Oncology training programmes for general practitioners: a scoping review
INTRODUCTION: Due to the increasing global burden of cancer and the shortage of trained medical oncologists, training General Practitioners (GPs) in Oncology (known as GPOs) has been proposed as a means to potentially ease some burden on medical oncologists with heavy workloads, especially in low-an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cancer Intelligence
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8241444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34267797 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2021.1241 |
_version_ | 1783715412809089024 |
---|---|
author | Gyawali, Bishal Jalink, Matthew Effing, Sophie Marie Anne Dalgarno, Nancy Kolomitro, Klodiana Thapa, Niresh Poudyal, Bishesh Sharma Berry, Scott |
author_facet | Gyawali, Bishal Jalink, Matthew Effing, Sophie Marie Anne Dalgarno, Nancy Kolomitro, Klodiana Thapa, Niresh Poudyal, Bishesh Sharma Berry, Scott |
author_sort | Gyawali, Bishal |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Due to the increasing global burden of cancer and the shortage of trained medical oncologists, training General Practitioners (GPs) in Oncology (known as GPOs) has been proposed as a means to potentially ease some burden on medical oncologists with heavy workloads, especially in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs), by task-sharing and task-shifting. We undertook a scoping review to identify and characterise the existing training programmes and curricula for GPOs globally. DESIGN: We searched three major electronic databases: EMBASE, Medline/PubMed and Education Source for articles that described a medical oncology training programme for GPs. All study types were eligible in this review. We followed a two-stage standardised screening process using two independent reviewers to evaluate the eligibility of the articles. RESULTS: Five peer-reviewed articles were included in our review and grey literature scans identified an additional seven GPO training programmes for a total of 12 programmes and their curricula. All of the included studies were from high-income countries. The duration of programmes varied from comprehensive programmes structured over 2 years (n = 2) to shorter duration medical oncology training activities (n = 2), a short, 1.5-day workshop and a 10-hour course. In the grey literature, GPO training programme durations ranged from 2 weeks to 13 months. A mixture of delivery methods was employed including didactic lectures and clinical rotations. CONCLUSION: This scoping review identified a small number of heterogeneous studies and grey literature sources that described and/or evaluated medical oncology training programmes for GPs. The information synthesised here can be used to foster the collaboration needed for the continued development of GPO programmes that could help address the problem of lack of workforce to meet the rising burden of cancer, especially in LMICs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8241444 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cancer Intelligence |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82414442021-07-14 Oncology training programmes for general practitioners: a scoping review Gyawali, Bishal Jalink, Matthew Effing, Sophie Marie Anne Dalgarno, Nancy Kolomitro, Klodiana Thapa, Niresh Poudyal, Bishesh Sharma Berry, Scott Ecancermedicalscience Research INTRODUCTION: Due to the increasing global burden of cancer and the shortage of trained medical oncologists, training General Practitioners (GPs) in Oncology (known as GPOs) has been proposed as a means to potentially ease some burden on medical oncologists with heavy workloads, especially in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs), by task-sharing and task-shifting. We undertook a scoping review to identify and characterise the existing training programmes and curricula for GPOs globally. DESIGN: We searched three major electronic databases: EMBASE, Medline/PubMed and Education Source for articles that described a medical oncology training programme for GPs. All study types were eligible in this review. We followed a two-stage standardised screening process using two independent reviewers to evaluate the eligibility of the articles. RESULTS: Five peer-reviewed articles were included in our review and grey literature scans identified an additional seven GPO training programmes for a total of 12 programmes and their curricula. All of the included studies were from high-income countries. The duration of programmes varied from comprehensive programmes structured over 2 years (n = 2) to shorter duration medical oncology training activities (n = 2), a short, 1.5-day workshop and a 10-hour course. In the grey literature, GPO training programme durations ranged from 2 weeks to 13 months. A mixture of delivery methods was employed including didactic lectures and clinical rotations. CONCLUSION: This scoping review identified a small number of heterogeneous studies and grey literature sources that described and/or evaluated medical oncology training programmes for GPs. The information synthesised here can be used to foster the collaboration needed for the continued development of GPO programmes that could help address the problem of lack of workforce to meet the rising burden of cancer, especially in LMICs. Cancer Intelligence 2021-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8241444/ /pubmed/34267797 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2021.1241 Text en © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Gyawali, Bishal Jalink, Matthew Effing, Sophie Marie Anne Dalgarno, Nancy Kolomitro, Klodiana Thapa, Niresh Poudyal, Bishesh Sharma Berry, Scott Oncology training programmes for general practitioners: a scoping review |
title | Oncology training programmes for general practitioners: a scoping review |
title_full | Oncology training programmes for general practitioners: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Oncology training programmes for general practitioners: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Oncology training programmes for general practitioners: a scoping review |
title_short | Oncology training programmes for general practitioners: a scoping review |
title_sort | oncology training programmes for general practitioners: a scoping review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8241444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34267797 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2021.1241 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gyawalibishal oncologytrainingprogrammesforgeneralpractitionersascopingreview AT jalinkmatthew oncologytrainingprogrammesforgeneralpractitionersascopingreview AT effingsophiemarieanne oncologytrainingprogrammesforgeneralpractitionersascopingreview AT dalgarnonancy oncologytrainingprogrammesforgeneralpractitionersascopingreview AT kolomitroklodiana oncologytrainingprogrammesforgeneralpractitionersascopingreview AT thapaniresh oncologytrainingprogrammesforgeneralpractitionersascopingreview AT poudyalbisheshsharma oncologytrainingprogrammesforgeneralpractitionersascopingreview AT berryscott oncologytrainingprogrammesforgeneralpractitionersascopingreview |