Cargando…

To Compare the Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Versus Labetalol in Providing Controlled Hypotension in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

BACKGROUND: Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is a surgical intervention for sinus diseases. Bleeding is a common concern during FESS. Hemodynamic stability and quality surgical field visibility help to achieve the best outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The present study primarily intended to compare t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: J N, Sujay, Kumar, Shiva, Vijay, Tanushree
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8241463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34221935
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.108915
_version_ 1783715417333694464
author J N, Sujay
Kumar, Shiva
Vijay, Tanushree
author_facet J N, Sujay
Kumar, Shiva
Vijay, Tanushree
author_sort J N, Sujay
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is a surgical intervention for sinus diseases. Bleeding is a common concern during FESS. Hemodynamic stability and quality surgical field visibility help to achieve the best outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The present study primarily intended to compare the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine versus labetalol in providing controlled hypotension during FESS and then to assess the quality of the surgical field. METHODS: The current research was conducted as a prospective randomized double-blinded clinical study. Sixty patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I or II status undergoing FESS under general anesthesia were divided into two groups, each with 30 members. Patients receiving dexmedetomidine and labetalol were named as group D and L, respectively. The study intended to manage mean arterial pressure (MAP) between 65 - 75 mmHg. The visibility of the operative field was evaluated using Fromme and Boezaart scoring system. Total intraoperative fentanyl consumption and postoperative first analgesic request time were recorded. RESULTS: The MAP target was achieved in both groups. Intergroup differences concerning MAP were observed in both D (75.0 ± 2.0) and L (82.4 ± 5.2) groups (P-value < 0.05). Scores for blood loss were significantly lower in the D group (1.3 ± 0.3) compared to the L group (2.1 ± 0.3) (P-value < 0.05). There was no intergroup difference concerning the mean heart rate (group D; 70.8 ± 4.2, and group L; 73.4 ± 4.4). The total dose of fentanyl consumed was found to be significantly lower in the group D (41.9 ± 5.8) compared to group L (59.9 ± 5.3) (P-value < 0.05). The first analgesic request time was significantly longer in the group D (50.2 ± 9.1) compared to group L (24.8 ± 5.1) (P-value < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine provided better hemodynamic stability and operative field visibility as compared to labetalol during FESS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8241463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Kowsar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82414632021-07-02 To Compare the Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Versus Labetalol in Providing Controlled Hypotension in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery J N, Sujay Kumar, Shiva Vijay, Tanushree Anesth Pain Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is a surgical intervention for sinus diseases. Bleeding is a common concern during FESS. Hemodynamic stability and quality surgical field visibility help to achieve the best outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The present study primarily intended to compare the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine versus labetalol in providing controlled hypotension during FESS and then to assess the quality of the surgical field. METHODS: The current research was conducted as a prospective randomized double-blinded clinical study. Sixty patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I or II status undergoing FESS under general anesthesia were divided into two groups, each with 30 members. Patients receiving dexmedetomidine and labetalol were named as group D and L, respectively. The study intended to manage mean arterial pressure (MAP) between 65 - 75 mmHg. The visibility of the operative field was evaluated using Fromme and Boezaart scoring system. Total intraoperative fentanyl consumption and postoperative first analgesic request time were recorded. RESULTS: The MAP target was achieved in both groups. Intergroup differences concerning MAP were observed in both D (75.0 ± 2.0) and L (82.4 ± 5.2) groups (P-value < 0.05). Scores for blood loss were significantly lower in the D group (1.3 ± 0.3) compared to the L group (2.1 ± 0.3) (P-value < 0.05). There was no intergroup difference concerning the mean heart rate (group D; 70.8 ± 4.2, and group L; 73.4 ± 4.4). The total dose of fentanyl consumed was found to be significantly lower in the group D (41.9 ± 5.8) compared to group L (59.9 ± 5.3) (P-value < 0.05). The first analgesic request time was significantly longer in the group D (50.2 ± 9.1) compared to group L (24.8 ± 5.1) (P-value < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine provided better hemodynamic stability and operative field visibility as compared to labetalol during FESS. Kowsar 2021-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8241463/ /pubmed/34221935 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.108915 Text en Copyright © 2021, Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
J N, Sujay
Kumar, Shiva
Vijay, Tanushree
To Compare the Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Versus Labetalol in Providing Controlled Hypotension in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
title To Compare the Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Versus Labetalol in Providing Controlled Hypotension in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
title_full To Compare the Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Versus Labetalol in Providing Controlled Hypotension in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
title_fullStr To Compare the Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Versus Labetalol in Providing Controlled Hypotension in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
title_full_unstemmed To Compare the Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Versus Labetalol in Providing Controlled Hypotension in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
title_short To Compare the Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Versus Labetalol in Providing Controlled Hypotension in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
title_sort to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus labetalol in providing controlled hypotension in functional endoscopic sinus surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8241463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34221935
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.108915
work_keys_str_mv AT jnsujay tocomparetheefficacyofdexmedetomidineversuslabetalolinprovidingcontrolledhypotensioninfunctionalendoscopicsinussurgery
AT kumarshiva tocomparetheefficacyofdexmedetomidineversuslabetalolinprovidingcontrolledhypotensioninfunctionalendoscopicsinussurgery
AT vijaytanushree tocomparetheefficacyofdexmedetomidineversuslabetalolinprovidingcontrolledhypotensioninfunctionalendoscopicsinussurgery