Cargando…

Use of Narrow-Diameter Implants in Completely Edentulous Patients as a Prosthetic Option: A Systematic Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present review is to assess the implant survival, marginal bone loss, and biomechanical features of narrow-diameter implants (2.5-3.5 mm) supporting or retaining full-arch fixed or removable restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three operators screened the literature...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Storelli, S., Caputo, A., Palandrani, G., Peditto, M., Del Fabbro, M., Romeo, E., Oteri, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8241526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34239926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5571793
_version_ 1783715430251102208
author Storelli, S.
Caputo, A.
Palandrani, G.
Peditto, M.
Del Fabbro, M.
Romeo, E.
Oteri, G.
author_facet Storelli, S.
Caputo, A.
Palandrani, G.
Peditto, M.
Del Fabbro, M.
Romeo, E.
Oteri, G.
author_sort Storelli, S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present review is to assess the implant survival, marginal bone loss, and biomechanical features of narrow-diameter implants (2.5-3.5 mm) supporting or retaining full-arch fixed or removable restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three operators screened the literature (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar) and performed a hand search on the main journals that focus on implantology until 24 March 2019. Only articles that considered full-arch restorations supported or retained by narrow-diameter implants (2.5-3.5 mm) were considered if they have a minimum of 10 patients and a mean follow-up of at least 6 months. The outcome variables were survival of implants and marginal bone loss. The review was performed according to the PRISMA statements. Risk of bias assessment was evaluated. Failure rates were analyzed using random effect Poisson regression models to obtain the summary estimate of 5-year survival rate and marginal bone loss. RESULTS: A total of nine papers were finally selected, reporting a high survival rate of the implants. Eight studies focused only on the mandible while one study reported data from both mandible and maxilla. All studies reported on removable restorations; none focused on fixed rehabilitations. The estimated survival rate for 5 years of follow-up was calculated to be 92.25% for the implants. The estimated marginal bone loss after 5 years was calculated to be 1.40 mm. No study reported implant fractures. CONCLUSIONS: With the limitations of the present study, there is evidence that 2.5-3.5 mm narrow-diameter implants retaining a removable restoration can be a successful treatment in fully edentulous patients. No data on fixed restorations was available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8241526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82415262021-07-07 Use of Narrow-Diameter Implants in Completely Edentulous Patients as a Prosthetic Option: A Systematic Review of the Literature Storelli, S. Caputo, A. Palandrani, G. Peditto, M. Del Fabbro, M. Romeo, E. Oteri, G. Biomed Res Int Review Article OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present review is to assess the implant survival, marginal bone loss, and biomechanical features of narrow-diameter implants (2.5-3.5 mm) supporting or retaining full-arch fixed or removable restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three operators screened the literature (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar) and performed a hand search on the main journals that focus on implantology until 24 March 2019. Only articles that considered full-arch restorations supported or retained by narrow-diameter implants (2.5-3.5 mm) were considered if they have a minimum of 10 patients and a mean follow-up of at least 6 months. The outcome variables were survival of implants and marginal bone loss. The review was performed according to the PRISMA statements. Risk of bias assessment was evaluated. Failure rates were analyzed using random effect Poisson regression models to obtain the summary estimate of 5-year survival rate and marginal bone loss. RESULTS: A total of nine papers were finally selected, reporting a high survival rate of the implants. Eight studies focused only on the mandible while one study reported data from both mandible and maxilla. All studies reported on removable restorations; none focused on fixed rehabilitations. The estimated survival rate for 5 years of follow-up was calculated to be 92.25% for the implants. The estimated marginal bone loss after 5 years was calculated to be 1.40 mm. No study reported implant fractures. CONCLUSIONS: With the limitations of the present study, there is evidence that 2.5-3.5 mm narrow-diameter implants retaining a removable restoration can be a successful treatment in fully edentulous patients. No data on fixed restorations was available. Hindawi 2021-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8241526/ /pubmed/34239926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5571793 Text en Copyright © 2021 S. Storelli et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Storelli, S.
Caputo, A.
Palandrani, G.
Peditto, M.
Del Fabbro, M.
Romeo, E.
Oteri, G.
Use of Narrow-Diameter Implants in Completely Edentulous Patients as a Prosthetic Option: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title Use of Narrow-Diameter Implants in Completely Edentulous Patients as a Prosthetic Option: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_full Use of Narrow-Diameter Implants in Completely Edentulous Patients as a Prosthetic Option: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_fullStr Use of Narrow-Diameter Implants in Completely Edentulous Patients as a Prosthetic Option: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed Use of Narrow-Diameter Implants in Completely Edentulous Patients as a Prosthetic Option: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_short Use of Narrow-Diameter Implants in Completely Edentulous Patients as a Prosthetic Option: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_sort use of narrow-diameter implants in completely edentulous patients as a prosthetic option: a systematic review of the literature
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8241526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34239926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5571793
work_keys_str_mv AT storellis useofnarrowdiameterimplantsincompletelyedentulouspatientsasaprostheticoptionasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT caputoa useofnarrowdiameterimplantsincompletelyedentulouspatientsasaprostheticoptionasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT palandranig useofnarrowdiameterimplantsincompletelyedentulouspatientsasaprostheticoptionasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT pedittom useofnarrowdiameterimplantsincompletelyedentulouspatientsasaprostheticoptionasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT delfabbrom useofnarrowdiameterimplantsincompletelyedentulouspatientsasaprostheticoptionasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT romeoe useofnarrowdiameterimplantsincompletelyedentulouspatientsasaprostheticoptionasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT oterig useofnarrowdiameterimplantsincompletelyedentulouspatientsasaprostheticoptionasystematicreviewoftheliterature