Cargando…
Use of Narrow-Diameter Implants in Completely Edentulous Patients as a Prosthetic Option: A Systematic Review of the Literature
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present review is to assess the implant survival, marginal bone loss, and biomechanical features of narrow-diameter implants (2.5-3.5 mm) supporting or retaining full-arch fixed or removable restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three operators screened the literature...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8241526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34239926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5571793 |
_version_ | 1783715430251102208 |
---|---|
author | Storelli, S. Caputo, A. Palandrani, G. Peditto, M. Del Fabbro, M. Romeo, E. Oteri, G. |
author_facet | Storelli, S. Caputo, A. Palandrani, G. Peditto, M. Del Fabbro, M. Romeo, E. Oteri, G. |
author_sort | Storelli, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present review is to assess the implant survival, marginal bone loss, and biomechanical features of narrow-diameter implants (2.5-3.5 mm) supporting or retaining full-arch fixed or removable restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three operators screened the literature (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar) and performed a hand search on the main journals that focus on implantology until 24 March 2019. Only articles that considered full-arch restorations supported or retained by narrow-diameter implants (2.5-3.5 mm) were considered if they have a minimum of 10 patients and a mean follow-up of at least 6 months. The outcome variables were survival of implants and marginal bone loss. The review was performed according to the PRISMA statements. Risk of bias assessment was evaluated. Failure rates were analyzed using random effect Poisson regression models to obtain the summary estimate of 5-year survival rate and marginal bone loss. RESULTS: A total of nine papers were finally selected, reporting a high survival rate of the implants. Eight studies focused only on the mandible while one study reported data from both mandible and maxilla. All studies reported on removable restorations; none focused on fixed rehabilitations. The estimated survival rate for 5 years of follow-up was calculated to be 92.25% for the implants. The estimated marginal bone loss after 5 years was calculated to be 1.40 mm. No study reported implant fractures. CONCLUSIONS: With the limitations of the present study, there is evidence that 2.5-3.5 mm narrow-diameter implants retaining a removable restoration can be a successful treatment in fully edentulous patients. No data on fixed restorations was available. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8241526 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82415262021-07-07 Use of Narrow-Diameter Implants in Completely Edentulous Patients as a Prosthetic Option: A Systematic Review of the Literature Storelli, S. Caputo, A. Palandrani, G. Peditto, M. Del Fabbro, M. Romeo, E. Oteri, G. Biomed Res Int Review Article OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present review is to assess the implant survival, marginal bone loss, and biomechanical features of narrow-diameter implants (2.5-3.5 mm) supporting or retaining full-arch fixed or removable restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three operators screened the literature (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar) and performed a hand search on the main journals that focus on implantology until 24 March 2019. Only articles that considered full-arch restorations supported or retained by narrow-diameter implants (2.5-3.5 mm) were considered if they have a minimum of 10 patients and a mean follow-up of at least 6 months. The outcome variables were survival of implants and marginal bone loss. The review was performed according to the PRISMA statements. Risk of bias assessment was evaluated. Failure rates were analyzed using random effect Poisson regression models to obtain the summary estimate of 5-year survival rate and marginal bone loss. RESULTS: A total of nine papers were finally selected, reporting a high survival rate of the implants. Eight studies focused only on the mandible while one study reported data from both mandible and maxilla. All studies reported on removable restorations; none focused on fixed rehabilitations. The estimated survival rate for 5 years of follow-up was calculated to be 92.25% for the implants. The estimated marginal bone loss after 5 years was calculated to be 1.40 mm. No study reported implant fractures. CONCLUSIONS: With the limitations of the present study, there is evidence that 2.5-3.5 mm narrow-diameter implants retaining a removable restoration can be a successful treatment in fully edentulous patients. No data on fixed restorations was available. Hindawi 2021-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8241526/ /pubmed/34239926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5571793 Text en Copyright © 2021 S. Storelli et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Storelli, S. Caputo, A. Palandrani, G. Peditto, M. Del Fabbro, M. Romeo, E. Oteri, G. Use of Narrow-Diameter Implants in Completely Edentulous Patients as a Prosthetic Option: A Systematic Review of the Literature |
title | Use of Narrow-Diameter Implants in Completely Edentulous Patients as a Prosthetic Option: A Systematic Review of the Literature |
title_full | Use of Narrow-Diameter Implants in Completely Edentulous Patients as a Prosthetic Option: A Systematic Review of the Literature |
title_fullStr | Use of Narrow-Diameter Implants in Completely Edentulous Patients as a Prosthetic Option: A Systematic Review of the Literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of Narrow-Diameter Implants in Completely Edentulous Patients as a Prosthetic Option: A Systematic Review of the Literature |
title_short | Use of Narrow-Diameter Implants in Completely Edentulous Patients as a Prosthetic Option: A Systematic Review of the Literature |
title_sort | use of narrow-diameter implants in completely edentulous patients as a prosthetic option: a systematic review of the literature |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8241526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34239926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5571793 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT storellis useofnarrowdiameterimplantsincompletelyedentulouspatientsasaprostheticoptionasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT caputoa useofnarrowdiameterimplantsincompletelyedentulouspatientsasaprostheticoptionasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT palandranig useofnarrowdiameterimplantsincompletelyedentulouspatientsasaprostheticoptionasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT pedittom useofnarrowdiameterimplantsincompletelyedentulouspatientsasaprostheticoptionasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT delfabbrom useofnarrowdiameterimplantsincompletelyedentulouspatientsasaprostheticoptionasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT romeoe useofnarrowdiameterimplantsincompletelyedentulouspatientsasaprostheticoptionasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT oterig useofnarrowdiameterimplantsincompletelyedentulouspatientsasaprostheticoptionasystematicreviewoftheliterature |