Cargando…

Ulnar-Basilic Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis Access: Utility as the “Second Procedure” after Radio Cephalic Fistula

Objectives: As per standard guidelines, the recommended order of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation for hemodialysis (HD) access is radiocephalic (RC), followed by proximal elbow fistulas and arteriovenous graft. Although ulnar-basilic (UB) fistula has been an alternative to RC-AVF, still this pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Shobhit, Bera, Sudipta, Goyal, Vikas Deep, Gupta, Vivek, Bisht, Navneeta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8241561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34239638
http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.20-00124
_version_ 1783715438517026816
author Sharma, Shobhit
Bera, Sudipta
Goyal, Vikas Deep
Gupta, Vivek
Bisht, Navneeta
author_facet Sharma, Shobhit
Bera, Sudipta
Goyal, Vikas Deep
Gupta, Vivek
Bisht, Navneeta
author_sort Sharma, Shobhit
collection PubMed
description Objectives: As per standard guidelines, the recommended order of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation for hemodialysis (HD) access is radiocephalic (RC), followed by proximal elbow fistulas and arteriovenous graft. Although ulnar-basilic (UB) fistula has been an alternative to RC-AVF, still this procedure searches clear recommendations. We present here our experience on UB-AVF as the preferred “second procedure” instead of proximal fistula after the RC-AVF. Methods: Forty-two UB-AVF were created in nonfeasible and failed RC-AVF cases between 2016 and 2018. They were reviewed retrospectively and outcomes were compared with 480 RC-AVF constructed within the same period. Results: The primary patency at 18 months was 73.8%, 69.6% and mean maturation time was 33.7±6.6 days, 32.1±4.7 days for UB-AVF and RC-AVF respectively (p>0.05). Conclusion: Our altered order of preference enabled us to create all the first-time fistula in the distal forearm, providing all the advantages of distal fistula like RC-AVF and avoiding proximal fistula, improved patient convenience and short-term benefit. In an inference that may be used for references and needs support from a larger sample and longer duration study from other centers, UB-AVF may be considered as the second option after RC-AVF depending on the clinical scenario.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8241561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82415612021-07-07 Ulnar-Basilic Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis Access: Utility as the “Second Procedure” after Radio Cephalic Fistula Sharma, Shobhit Bera, Sudipta Goyal, Vikas Deep Gupta, Vivek Bisht, Navneeta Ann Vasc Dis Original Article Objectives: As per standard guidelines, the recommended order of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation for hemodialysis (HD) access is radiocephalic (RC), followed by proximal elbow fistulas and arteriovenous graft. Although ulnar-basilic (UB) fistula has been an alternative to RC-AVF, still this procedure searches clear recommendations. We present here our experience on UB-AVF as the preferred “second procedure” instead of proximal fistula after the RC-AVF. Methods: Forty-two UB-AVF were created in nonfeasible and failed RC-AVF cases between 2016 and 2018. They were reviewed retrospectively and outcomes were compared with 480 RC-AVF constructed within the same period. Results: The primary patency at 18 months was 73.8%, 69.6% and mean maturation time was 33.7±6.6 days, 32.1±4.7 days for UB-AVF and RC-AVF respectively (p>0.05). Conclusion: Our altered order of preference enabled us to create all the first-time fistula in the distal forearm, providing all the advantages of distal fistula like RC-AVF and avoiding proximal fistula, improved patient convenience and short-term benefit. In an inference that may be used for references and needs support from a larger sample and longer duration study from other centers, UB-AVF may be considered as the second option after RC-AVF depending on the clinical scenario. Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology 2021-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8241561/ /pubmed/34239638 http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.20-00124 Text en © 2021 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Vascular Diseases. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the credit of the original work, a link to the license, and indication of any change are properly given, and the original work is not used for commercial purposes. Remixed or transformed contributions must be distributed under the same license as the original.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sharma, Shobhit
Bera, Sudipta
Goyal, Vikas Deep
Gupta, Vivek
Bisht, Navneeta
Ulnar-Basilic Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis Access: Utility as the “Second Procedure” after Radio Cephalic Fistula
title Ulnar-Basilic Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis Access: Utility as the “Second Procedure” after Radio Cephalic Fistula
title_full Ulnar-Basilic Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis Access: Utility as the “Second Procedure” after Radio Cephalic Fistula
title_fullStr Ulnar-Basilic Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis Access: Utility as the “Second Procedure” after Radio Cephalic Fistula
title_full_unstemmed Ulnar-Basilic Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis Access: Utility as the “Second Procedure” after Radio Cephalic Fistula
title_short Ulnar-Basilic Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis Access: Utility as the “Second Procedure” after Radio Cephalic Fistula
title_sort ulnar-basilic arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis access: utility as the “second procedure” after radio cephalic fistula
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8241561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34239638
http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.20-00124
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmashobhit ulnarbasilicarteriovenousfistulaforhemodialysisaccessutilityasthesecondprocedureafterradiocephalicfistula
AT berasudipta ulnarbasilicarteriovenousfistulaforhemodialysisaccessutilityasthesecondprocedureafterradiocephalicfistula
AT goyalvikasdeep ulnarbasilicarteriovenousfistulaforhemodialysisaccessutilityasthesecondprocedureafterradiocephalicfistula
AT guptavivek ulnarbasilicarteriovenousfistulaforhemodialysisaccessutilityasthesecondprocedureafterradiocephalicfistula
AT bishtnavneeta ulnarbasilicarteriovenousfistulaforhemodialysisaccessutilityasthesecondprocedureafterradiocephalicfistula