Cargando…
Ulnar-Basilic Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis Access: Utility as the “Second Procedure” after Radio Cephalic Fistula
Objectives: As per standard guidelines, the recommended order of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation for hemodialysis (HD) access is radiocephalic (RC), followed by proximal elbow fistulas and arteriovenous graft. Although ulnar-basilic (UB) fistula has been an alternative to RC-AVF, still this pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8241561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34239638 http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.20-00124 |
_version_ | 1783715438517026816 |
---|---|
author | Sharma, Shobhit Bera, Sudipta Goyal, Vikas Deep Gupta, Vivek Bisht, Navneeta |
author_facet | Sharma, Shobhit Bera, Sudipta Goyal, Vikas Deep Gupta, Vivek Bisht, Navneeta |
author_sort | Sharma, Shobhit |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives: As per standard guidelines, the recommended order of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation for hemodialysis (HD) access is radiocephalic (RC), followed by proximal elbow fistulas and arteriovenous graft. Although ulnar-basilic (UB) fistula has been an alternative to RC-AVF, still this procedure searches clear recommendations. We present here our experience on UB-AVF as the preferred “second procedure” instead of proximal fistula after the RC-AVF. Methods: Forty-two UB-AVF were created in nonfeasible and failed RC-AVF cases between 2016 and 2018. They were reviewed retrospectively and outcomes were compared with 480 RC-AVF constructed within the same period. Results: The primary patency at 18 months was 73.8%, 69.6% and mean maturation time was 33.7±6.6 days, 32.1±4.7 days for UB-AVF and RC-AVF respectively (p>0.05). Conclusion: Our altered order of preference enabled us to create all the first-time fistula in the distal forearm, providing all the advantages of distal fistula like RC-AVF and avoiding proximal fistula, improved patient convenience and short-term benefit. In an inference that may be used for references and needs support from a larger sample and longer duration study from other centers, UB-AVF may be considered as the second option after RC-AVF depending on the clinical scenario. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8241561 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82415612021-07-07 Ulnar-Basilic Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis Access: Utility as the “Second Procedure” after Radio Cephalic Fistula Sharma, Shobhit Bera, Sudipta Goyal, Vikas Deep Gupta, Vivek Bisht, Navneeta Ann Vasc Dis Original Article Objectives: As per standard guidelines, the recommended order of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation for hemodialysis (HD) access is radiocephalic (RC), followed by proximal elbow fistulas and arteriovenous graft. Although ulnar-basilic (UB) fistula has been an alternative to RC-AVF, still this procedure searches clear recommendations. We present here our experience on UB-AVF as the preferred “second procedure” instead of proximal fistula after the RC-AVF. Methods: Forty-two UB-AVF were created in nonfeasible and failed RC-AVF cases between 2016 and 2018. They were reviewed retrospectively and outcomes were compared with 480 RC-AVF constructed within the same period. Results: The primary patency at 18 months was 73.8%, 69.6% and mean maturation time was 33.7±6.6 days, 32.1±4.7 days for UB-AVF and RC-AVF respectively (p>0.05). Conclusion: Our altered order of preference enabled us to create all the first-time fistula in the distal forearm, providing all the advantages of distal fistula like RC-AVF and avoiding proximal fistula, improved patient convenience and short-term benefit. In an inference that may be used for references and needs support from a larger sample and longer duration study from other centers, UB-AVF may be considered as the second option after RC-AVF depending on the clinical scenario. Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology 2021-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8241561/ /pubmed/34239638 http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.20-00124 Text en © 2021 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Vascular Diseases. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the credit of the original work, a link to the license, and indication of any change are properly given, and the original work is not used for commercial purposes. Remixed or transformed contributions must be distributed under the same license as the original. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sharma, Shobhit Bera, Sudipta Goyal, Vikas Deep Gupta, Vivek Bisht, Navneeta Ulnar-Basilic Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis Access: Utility as the “Second Procedure” after Radio Cephalic Fistula |
title | Ulnar-Basilic Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis Access: Utility as the “Second Procedure” after Radio Cephalic Fistula |
title_full | Ulnar-Basilic Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis Access: Utility as the “Second Procedure” after Radio Cephalic Fistula |
title_fullStr | Ulnar-Basilic Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis Access: Utility as the “Second Procedure” after Radio Cephalic Fistula |
title_full_unstemmed | Ulnar-Basilic Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis Access: Utility as the “Second Procedure” after Radio Cephalic Fistula |
title_short | Ulnar-Basilic Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis Access: Utility as the “Second Procedure” after Radio Cephalic Fistula |
title_sort | ulnar-basilic arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis access: utility as the “second procedure” after radio cephalic fistula |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8241561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34239638 http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.20-00124 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharmashobhit ulnarbasilicarteriovenousfistulaforhemodialysisaccessutilityasthesecondprocedureafterradiocephalicfistula AT berasudipta ulnarbasilicarteriovenousfistulaforhemodialysisaccessutilityasthesecondprocedureafterradiocephalicfistula AT goyalvikasdeep ulnarbasilicarteriovenousfistulaforhemodialysisaccessutilityasthesecondprocedureafterradiocephalicfistula AT guptavivek ulnarbasilicarteriovenousfistulaforhemodialysisaccessutilityasthesecondprocedureafterradiocephalicfistula AT bishtnavneeta ulnarbasilicarteriovenousfistulaforhemodialysisaccessutilityasthesecondprocedureafterradiocephalicfistula |