Cargando…

Comparison of the diagnostic performance and impact on management of 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI in multiple myeloma

PURPOSE: Comparative data on the impact of imaging on management is lacking for multiple myeloma. This study compared the diagnostic performance and impact on management of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) and whole-body magnetic resonance imag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Westerland, Olwen, Amlani, Ashik, Kelly-Morland, Christian, Fraczek, Michal, Bailey, Katherine, Gleeson, Mary, El-Najjar, Inas, Streetly, Matthew, Bassett, Paul, Cook, Gary J. R., Goh, Vicky
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8241666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33469686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05182-2
_version_ 1783715461513347072
author Westerland, Olwen
Amlani, Ashik
Kelly-Morland, Christian
Fraczek, Michal
Bailey, Katherine
Gleeson, Mary
El-Najjar, Inas
Streetly, Matthew
Bassett, Paul
Cook, Gary J. R.
Goh, Vicky
author_facet Westerland, Olwen
Amlani, Ashik
Kelly-Morland, Christian
Fraczek, Michal
Bailey, Katherine
Gleeson, Mary
El-Najjar, Inas
Streetly, Matthew
Bassett, Paul
Cook, Gary J. R.
Goh, Vicky
author_sort Westerland, Olwen
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Comparative data on the impact of imaging on management is lacking for multiple myeloma. This study compared the diagnostic performance and impact on management of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) in treatment-naive myeloma. METHODS: Forty-six patients undergoing 18F-FDG PET/CT and WBMRI were reviewed by a nuclear medicine physician and radiologist, respectively, for the presence of myeloma bone disease. Blinded clinical and imaging data were reviewed by two haematologists in consensus and management recorded following clinical data ± 18F-FDG PET/CT or WBMRI. Bone disease was defined using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria and a clinical reference standard. Per-patient sensitivity for lesion detection was established. McNemar test compared management based on clinical assessment ± 18F-FDG PET/CT or WBMRI. RESULTS: Sensitivity for bone lesions was 69.6% (32/46) for 18F-FDG PET/CT (54.3% (25/46) for PET component alone) and 91.3% (42/46) for WBMRI. 27/46 (58.7%) of cases were concordant. In 19/46 patients (41.3%) WBMRI detected more focal bone lesions than 18F-FDG PET/CT. Based on clinical data alone, 32/46 (69.6%) patients would have been treated. Addition of 18F-FDG PET/CT to clinical data increased this to 40/46 (87.0%) patients (p = 0.02); and WBMRI to clinical data to 43/46 (93.5%) patients (p = 0.002). The difference in treatment decisions was not statistically significant between 18F-FDG PET/CT and WBMRI (p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT, WBMRI had a higher per patient sensitivity for bone disease. However, treatment decisions were not statistically different and either modality would be appropriate in initial staging, depending on local availability and expertise. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-020-05182-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8241666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82416662021-07-01 Comparison of the diagnostic performance and impact on management of 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI in multiple myeloma Westerland, Olwen Amlani, Ashik Kelly-Morland, Christian Fraczek, Michal Bailey, Katherine Gleeson, Mary El-Najjar, Inas Streetly, Matthew Bassett, Paul Cook, Gary J. R. Goh, Vicky Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article PURPOSE: Comparative data on the impact of imaging on management is lacking for multiple myeloma. This study compared the diagnostic performance and impact on management of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) in treatment-naive myeloma. METHODS: Forty-six patients undergoing 18F-FDG PET/CT and WBMRI were reviewed by a nuclear medicine physician and radiologist, respectively, for the presence of myeloma bone disease. Blinded clinical and imaging data were reviewed by two haematologists in consensus and management recorded following clinical data ± 18F-FDG PET/CT or WBMRI. Bone disease was defined using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria and a clinical reference standard. Per-patient sensitivity for lesion detection was established. McNemar test compared management based on clinical assessment ± 18F-FDG PET/CT or WBMRI. RESULTS: Sensitivity for bone lesions was 69.6% (32/46) for 18F-FDG PET/CT (54.3% (25/46) for PET component alone) and 91.3% (42/46) for WBMRI. 27/46 (58.7%) of cases were concordant. In 19/46 patients (41.3%) WBMRI detected more focal bone lesions than 18F-FDG PET/CT. Based on clinical data alone, 32/46 (69.6%) patients would have been treated. Addition of 18F-FDG PET/CT to clinical data increased this to 40/46 (87.0%) patients (p = 0.02); and WBMRI to clinical data to 43/46 (93.5%) patients (p = 0.002). The difference in treatment decisions was not statistically significant between 18F-FDG PET/CT and WBMRI (p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT, WBMRI had a higher per patient sensitivity for bone disease. However, treatment decisions were not statistically different and either modality would be appropriate in initial staging, depending on local availability and expertise. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-020-05182-2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-01-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8241666/ /pubmed/33469686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05182-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Westerland, Olwen
Amlani, Ashik
Kelly-Morland, Christian
Fraczek, Michal
Bailey, Katherine
Gleeson, Mary
El-Najjar, Inas
Streetly, Matthew
Bassett, Paul
Cook, Gary J. R.
Goh, Vicky
Comparison of the diagnostic performance and impact on management of 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI in multiple myeloma
title Comparison of the diagnostic performance and impact on management of 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI in multiple myeloma
title_full Comparison of the diagnostic performance and impact on management of 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI in multiple myeloma
title_fullStr Comparison of the diagnostic performance and impact on management of 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI in multiple myeloma
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the diagnostic performance and impact on management of 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI in multiple myeloma
title_short Comparison of the diagnostic performance and impact on management of 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI in multiple myeloma
title_sort comparison of the diagnostic performance and impact on management of 18f-fdg pet/ct and whole-body mri in multiple myeloma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8241666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33469686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05182-2
work_keys_str_mv AT westerlandolwen comparisonofthediagnosticperformanceandimpactonmanagementof18ffdgpetctandwholebodymriinmultiplemyeloma
AT amlaniashik comparisonofthediagnosticperformanceandimpactonmanagementof18ffdgpetctandwholebodymriinmultiplemyeloma
AT kellymorlandchristian comparisonofthediagnosticperformanceandimpactonmanagementof18ffdgpetctandwholebodymriinmultiplemyeloma
AT fraczekmichal comparisonofthediagnosticperformanceandimpactonmanagementof18ffdgpetctandwholebodymriinmultiplemyeloma
AT baileykatherine comparisonofthediagnosticperformanceandimpactonmanagementof18ffdgpetctandwholebodymriinmultiplemyeloma
AT gleesonmary comparisonofthediagnosticperformanceandimpactonmanagementof18ffdgpetctandwholebodymriinmultiplemyeloma
AT elnajjarinas comparisonofthediagnosticperformanceandimpactonmanagementof18ffdgpetctandwholebodymriinmultiplemyeloma
AT streetlymatthew comparisonofthediagnosticperformanceandimpactonmanagementof18ffdgpetctandwholebodymriinmultiplemyeloma
AT bassettpaul comparisonofthediagnosticperformanceandimpactonmanagementof18ffdgpetctandwholebodymriinmultiplemyeloma
AT cookgaryjr comparisonofthediagnosticperformanceandimpactonmanagementof18ffdgpetctandwholebodymriinmultiplemyeloma
AT gohvicky comparisonofthediagnosticperformanceandimpactonmanagementof18ffdgpetctandwholebodymriinmultiplemyeloma
AT comparisonofthediagnosticperformanceandimpactonmanagementof18ffdgpetctandwholebodymriinmultiplemyeloma