Cargando…

Comparison of Spinal Versus Epidural Analgesia for Vaginal Delivery: A Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Recently, one of the problems in developing countries is pregnant women who insist on cesarean section for fear of painful vaginal delivery. There are various methods to reduce labor pain, including medical and non-medical methods. Neuraxial analgesia is classified as one of the best way...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Imani, Farnad, Lotfi, Sarah, Aminisaman, Javad, Shahmohamadi, Afshar, Ahmadi, Abbas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8241817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34221934
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.108335
_version_ 1783715494925172736
author Imani, Farnad
Lotfi, Sarah
Aminisaman, Javad
Shahmohamadi, Afshar
Ahmadi, Abbas
author_facet Imani, Farnad
Lotfi, Sarah
Aminisaman, Javad
Shahmohamadi, Afshar
Ahmadi, Abbas
author_sort Imani, Farnad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently, one of the problems in developing countries is pregnant women who insist on cesarean section for fear of painful vaginal delivery. There are various methods to reduce labor pain, including medical and non-medical methods. Neuraxial analgesia is classified as one of the best ways to reduce labor pain. Epidural analgesia is a classic and popular procedure to decrease labor pain. Nevertheless, other methods, such as spinal or combined spinal-epidural analgesia, is more effective compared with the epidural. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we investigated a single intrathecal versus epidural injection in pregnant women during childbirth. METHODS: In our research, after obtaining informed consent, the patients were randomly assigned to two equal groups: epidural and spinal. Each group contained 50 parturient women in advanced labor. In the epidural group, 2.5 mL isobaric bupivacaine 0.5%, sufentanil (0.2 mcg/mL), and 7 mL saline 0.9% were injected by an 18-gauge Tuohy needle at the L4-5 or L5-S1 intervertebral space, and in the spinal group, 0.5 mL isobaric bupivacaine 0.5%, 2.5 mcg sufentanil, and 0.5 mL saline 0.9% were injected by a 25-gauge pencil-point Quincke needle at the L4-5 or L5-S1 intervertebral spaces. For pain intensity, the visual analog scale (VAS) was used at serial intervals, and other variables, such as the onset and duration of analgesia, hypotension, neonatal APGAR score, fetal heart rate (FHR) changes, and other variables were examined. RESULTS: The mean time to onset analgesic effect was 4.6 min in the spinal group compared with 12.5 minutes in the epidural (P < 0.001). Duration of analgesia was 121 minutes in the spinal group compared with 104 min in the epidural group (P < 0.001). The time to reach the maximum block was 8.4 min in the spinal group vs. 22.2 min in the epidural group (P < 0.001). The duration of the second and third gestation stages was the same in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal analgesia is short and easy to perform and does not require advanced equipment and technical experience. Spinal analgesia can be a good option for labor analgesia and leads to achieving a lower pain score than epidural analgesia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8241817
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Kowsar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82418172021-07-02 Comparison of Spinal Versus Epidural Analgesia for Vaginal Delivery: A Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial Imani, Farnad Lotfi, Sarah Aminisaman, Javad Shahmohamadi, Afshar Ahmadi, Abbas Anesth Pain Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Recently, one of the problems in developing countries is pregnant women who insist on cesarean section for fear of painful vaginal delivery. There are various methods to reduce labor pain, including medical and non-medical methods. Neuraxial analgesia is classified as one of the best ways to reduce labor pain. Epidural analgesia is a classic and popular procedure to decrease labor pain. Nevertheless, other methods, such as spinal or combined spinal-epidural analgesia, is more effective compared with the epidural. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we investigated a single intrathecal versus epidural injection in pregnant women during childbirth. METHODS: In our research, after obtaining informed consent, the patients were randomly assigned to two equal groups: epidural and spinal. Each group contained 50 parturient women in advanced labor. In the epidural group, 2.5 mL isobaric bupivacaine 0.5%, sufentanil (0.2 mcg/mL), and 7 mL saline 0.9% were injected by an 18-gauge Tuohy needle at the L4-5 or L5-S1 intervertebral space, and in the spinal group, 0.5 mL isobaric bupivacaine 0.5%, 2.5 mcg sufentanil, and 0.5 mL saline 0.9% were injected by a 25-gauge pencil-point Quincke needle at the L4-5 or L5-S1 intervertebral spaces. For pain intensity, the visual analog scale (VAS) was used at serial intervals, and other variables, such as the onset and duration of analgesia, hypotension, neonatal APGAR score, fetal heart rate (FHR) changes, and other variables were examined. RESULTS: The mean time to onset analgesic effect was 4.6 min in the spinal group compared with 12.5 minutes in the epidural (P < 0.001). Duration of analgesia was 121 minutes in the spinal group compared with 104 min in the epidural group (P < 0.001). The time to reach the maximum block was 8.4 min in the spinal group vs. 22.2 min in the epidural group (P < 0.001). The duration of the second and third gestation stages was the same in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal analgesia is short and easy to perform and does not require advanced equipment and technical experience. Spinal analgesia can be a good option for labor analgesia and leads to achieving a lower pain score than epidural analgesia. Kowsar 2021-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8241817/ /pubmed/34221934 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.108335 Text en Copyright © 2021, Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Imani, Farnad
Lotfi, Sarah
Aminisaman, Javad
Shahmohamadi, Afshar
Ahmadi, Abbas
Comparison of Spinal Versus Epidural Analgesia for Vaginal Delivery: A Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial
title Comparison of Spinal Versus Epidural Analgesia for Vaginal Delivery: A Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial
title_full Comparison of Spinal Versus Epidural Analgesia for Vaginal Delivery: A Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of Spinal Versus Epidural Analgesia for Vaginal Delivery: A Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Spinal Versus Epidural Analgesia for Vaginal Delivery: A Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial
title_short Comparison of Spinal Versus Epidural Analgesia for Vaginal Delivery: A Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial
title_sort comparison of spinal versus epidural analgesia for vaginal delivery: a randomized double blinded clinical trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8241817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34221934
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.108335
work_keys_str_mv AT imanifarnad comparisonofspinalversusepiduralanalgesiaforvaginaldeliveryarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicaltrial
AT lotfisarah comparisonofspinalversusepiduralanalgesiaforvaginaldeliveryarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicaltrial
AT aminisamanjavad comparisonofspinalversusepiduralanalgesiaforvaginaldeliveryarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicaltrial
AT shahmohamadiafshar comparisonofspinalversusepiduralanalgesiaforvaginaldeliveryarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicaltrial
AT ahmadiabbas comparisonofspinalversusepiduralanalgesiaforvaginaldeliveryarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicaltrial