Cargando…

The evolution of disgust for pathogen detection and avoidance

The behavioral immune system posits that disgust functions to protect animals from pathogen exposure. Therefore, cues of pathogen risk should be a primary driver influencing variation in disgust. Yet, to our knowledge, neither the relationship between current pathogen risk and disgust, nor the corre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hlay, Jessica K., Albert, Graham, Batres, Carlota, Richardson, George, Placek, Caitlyn, Arnocky, Steven, Lieberman, Debra, Hodges-Simeon, Carolyn R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8241835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34188198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91712-3
_version_ 1783715499267325952
author Hlay, Jessica K.
Albert, Graham
Batres, Carlota
Richardson, George
Placek, Caitlyn
Arnocky, Steven
Lieberman, Debra
Hodges-Simeon, Carolyn R.
author_facet Hlay, Jessica K.
Albert, Graham
Batres, Carlota
Richardson, George
Placek, Caitlyn
Arnocky, Steven
Lieberman, Debra
Hodges-Simeon, Carolyn R.
author_sort Hlay, Jessica K.
collection PubMed
description The behavioral immune system posits that disgust functions to protect animals from pathogen exposure. Therefore, cues of pathogen risk should be a primary driver influencing variation in disgust. Yet, to our knowledge, neither the relationship between current pathogen risk and disgust, nor the correlation between objective and perceived pathogen risk have been addressed using ecologically valid measures in a global sample. The current article reports two studies addressing these gaps. In Study 1, we include a global sample (n = 361) and tested the influence of both perceived pathogen exposure and an objective measure of pathogen risk—local communicable infectious disease mortality rates—on individual differences in pathogen and sexual disgust sensitivities. In Study 2, we first replicate Study 1’s analyses in another large sample (n = 821), targeting four countries (US, Italy, Brazil, and India); we then replaced objective and perceived pathogen risk with variables specific to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In Study 1, both local infection mortality rates and perceived infection exposure predicted unique variance in pathogen and sexual disgust. In Study 2, we found that perceived infection exposure positively predicted sexual disgust, as predicted. When substituting perceived and objective SARS-CoV-2 risk in our models, perceived risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 positively predicted pathogen and sexual disgust, and state case rates negatively predicted pathogen disgust. Further, in both studies, objective measures of risk (i.e., local infection mortality and SARS-CoV-2 rates) positively correlated with subjective measures of risk (i.e., perceived infection exposure and perceived SARS-CoV-2 risk). Ultimately, these results provide two pieces of foundational evidence for the behavioral immune system: 1) perceptions of pathogen risk accurately assay local, objective mortality risk across countries, and 2) both perceived and objective pathogen risk explain variance in disgust levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8241835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82418352021-07-06 The evolution of disgust for pathogen detection and avoidance Hlay, Jessica K. Albert, Graham Batres, Carlota Richardson, George Placek, Caitlyn Arnocky, Steven Lieberman, Debra Hodges-Simeon, Carolyn R. Sci Rep Article The behavioral immune system posits that disgust functions to protect animals from pathogen exposure. Therefore, cues of pathogen risk should be a primary driver influencing variation in disgust. Yet, to our knowledge, neither the relationship between current pathogen risk and disgust, nor the correlation between objective and perceived pathogen risk have been addressed using ecologically valid measures in a global sample. The current article reports two studies addressing these gaps. In Study 1, we include a global sample (n = 361) and tested the influence of both perceived pathogen exposure and an objective measure of pathogen risk—local communicable infectious disease mortality rates—on individual differences in pathogen and sexual disgust sensitivities. In Study 2, we first replicate Study 1’s analyses in another large sample (n = 821), targeting four countries (US, Italy, Brazil, and India); we then replaced objective and perceived pathogen risk with variables specific to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In Study 1, both local infection mortality rates and perceived infection exposure predicted unique variance in pathogen and sexual disgust. In Study 2, we found that perceived infection exposure positively predicted sexual disgust, as predicted. When substituting perceived and objective SARS-CoV-2 risk in our models, perceived risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 positively predicted pathogen and sexual disgust, and state case rates negatively predicted pathogen disgust. Further, in both studies, objective measures of risk (i.e., local infection mortality and SARS-CoV-2 rates) positively correlated with subjective measures of risk (i.e., perceived infection exposure and perceived SARS-CoV-2 risk). Ultimately, these results provide two pieces of foundational evidence for the behavioral immune system: 1) perceptions of pathogen risk accurately assay local, objective mortality risk across countries, and 2) both perceived and objective pathogen risk explain variance in disgust levels. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8241835/ /pubmed/34188198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91712-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Hlay, Jessica K.
Albert, Graham
Batres, Carlota
Richardson, George
Placek, Caitlyn
Arnocky, Steven
Lieberman, Debra
Hodges-Simeon, Carolyn R.
The evolution of disgust for pathogen detection and avoidance
title The evolution of disgust for pathogen detection and avoidance
title_full The evolution of disgust for pathogen detection and avoidance
title_fullStr The evolution of disgust for pathogen detection and avoidance
title_full_unstemmed The evolution of disgust for pathogen detection and avoidance
title_short The evolution of disgust for pathogen detection and avoidance
title_sort evolution of disgust for pathogen detection and avoidance
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8241835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34188198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91712-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hlayjessicak theevolutionofdisgustforpathogendetectionandavoidance
AT albertgraham theevolutionofdisgustforpathogendetectionandavoidance
AT batrescarlota theevolutionofdisgustforpathogendetectionandavoidance
AT richardsongeorge theevolutionofdisgustforpathogendetectionandavoidance
AT placekcaitlyn theevolutionofdisgustforpathogendetectionandavoidance
AT arnockysteven theevolutionofdisgustforpathogendetectionandavoidance
AT liebermandebra theevolutionofdisgustforpathogendetectionandavoidance
AT hodgessimeoncarolynr theevolutionofdisgustforpathogendetectionandavoidance
AT hlayjessicak evolutionofdisgustforpathogendetectionandavoidance
AT albertgraham evolutionofdisgustforpathogendetectionandavoidance
AT batrescarlota evolutionofdisgustforpathogendetectionandavoidance
AT richardsongeorge evolutionofdisgustforpathogendetectionandavoidance
AT placekcaitlyn evolutionofdisgustforpathogendetectionandavoidance
AT arnockysteven evolutionofdisgustforpathogendetectionandavoidance
AT liebermandebra evolutionofdisgustforpathogendetectionandavoidance
AT hodgessimeoncarolynr evolutionofdisgustforpathogendetectionandavoidance