Cargando…

Assessment of image generation by quantum annealer

Quantum annealing was originally proposed as an approach for solving combinatorial optimization problems using quantum effects. D-Wave Systems has released a production model of quantum annealing hardware. However, the inherent noise and various environmental factors in the hardware hamper the deter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sato, Takehito, Ohzeki, Masayuki, Tanaka, Kazuyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8241870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34188070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92295-9
_version_ 1783715507766034432
author Sato, Takehito
Ohzeki, Masayuki
Tanaka, Kazuyuki
author_facet Sato, Takehito
Ohzeki, Masayuki
Tanaka, Kazuyuki
author_sort Sato, Takehito
collection PubMed
description Quantum annealing was originally proposed as an approach for solving combinatorial optimization problems using quantum effects. D-Wave Systems has released a production model of quantum annealing hardware. However, the inherent noise and various environmental factors in the hardware hamper the determination of optimal solutions. In addition, the freezing effect in regions with weak quantum fluctuations generates outputs approximately following a Gibbs–Boltzmann distribution at an extremely low temperature. Thus, a quantum annealer may also serve as a fast sampler for the Ising spin-glass problem, and several studies have investigated Boltzmann machine learning using a quantum annealer. Previous developments have focused on comparing the performance in the standard distance of the resulting distributions between conventional methods in classical computers and sampling by a quantum annealer. In this study, we focused on the performance of a quantum annealer as a generative model from a different aspect. To evaluate its performance, we prepared a discriminator given by a neural network trained on an a priori dataset. The evaluation results show a higher performance of quantum annealer compared with the classical approach for Boltzmann machine learning in training of the generative model. However the generation of the data suffers from the remanent quantum fluctuation in the quantum annealer. The quality of the generated images from the quantum annealer gets worse than the ideal case of the quantum annealing and the classical Monte-Carlo sampling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8241870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82418702021-07-06 Assessment of image generation by quantum annealer Sato, Takehito Ohzeki, Masayuki Tanaka, Kazuyuki Sci Rep Article Quantum annealing was originally proposed as an approach for solving combinatorial optimization problems using quantum effects. D-Wave Systems has released a production model of quantum annealing hardware. However, the inherent noise and various environmental factors in the hardware hamper the determination of optimal solutions. In addition, the freezing effect in regions with weak quantum fluctuations generates outputs approximately following a Gibbs–Boltzmann distribution at an extremely low temperature. Thus, a quantum annealer may also serve as a fast sampler for the Ising spin-glass problem, and several studies have investigated Boltzmann machine learning using a quantum annealer. Previous developments have focused on comparing the performance in the standard distance of the resulting distributions between conventional methods in classical computers and sampling by a quantum annealer. In this study, we focused on the performance of a quantum annealer as a generative model from a different aspect. To evaluate its performance, we prepared a discriminator given by a neural network trained on an a priori dataset. The evaluation results show a higher performance of quantum annealer compared with the classical approach for Boltzmann machine learning in training of the generative model. However the generation of the data suffers from the remanent quantum fluctuation in the quantum annealer. The quality of the generated images from the quantum annealer gets worse than the ideal case of the quantum annealing and the classical Monte-Carlo sampling. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8241870/ /pubmed/34188070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92295-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Sato, Takehito
Ohzeki, Masayuki
Tanaka, Kazuyuki
Assessment of image generation by quantum annealer
title Assessment of image generation by quantum annealer
title_full Assessment of image generation by quantum annealer
title_fullStr Assessment of image generation by quantum annealer
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of image generation by quantum annealer
title_short Assessment of image generation by quantum annealer
title_sort assessment of image generation by quantum annealer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8241870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34188070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92295-9
work_keys_str_mv AT satotakehito assessmentofimagegenerationbyquantumannealer
AT ohzekimasayuki assessmentofimagegenerationbyquantumannealer
AT tanakakazuyuki assessmentofimagegenerationbyquantumannealer