Cargando…
Induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized phase II trial
This randomized phase II trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus CRT alone in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) unsuitable for surgery (N = 110). The primary outcome was overall response rate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8242031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34188053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24288-1 |
_version_ | 1783715540919910400 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Shiliang Luo, Liling Zhao, Lei Zhu, Yujia Liu, Hui Li, Qiaoqiao Cai, Ling Hu, Yonghong Qiu, Bo Zhang, Li Shen, Jingxian Yang, Yadi Liu, Mengzhong Xi, Mian |
author_facet | Liu, Shiliang Luo, Liling Zhao, Lei Zhu, Yujia Liu, Hui Li, Qiaoqiao Cai, Ling Hu, Yonghong Qiu, Bo Zhang, Li Shen, Jingxian Yang, Yadi Liu, Mengzhong Xi, Mian |
author_sort | Liu, Shiliang |
collection | PubMed |
description | This randomized phase II trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus CRT alone in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) unsuitable for surgery (N = 110). The primary outcome was overall response rate (ORR), whereas the secondary outcome was overall survival. This trial did not meet pre-specified endpoints. The ORR was 74.5% in the induction chemotherapy group versus 61.8% in the CRT alone group (P = 0.152). The 3-year overall survival rate was 41.8% in the induction chemotherapy group and 38.1% in the CRT alone group (P = 0.584; hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.54–1.41). Grade 3–5 adverse events were similar. Patients who responded to induction chemotherapy had improved survival in the post-hoc analysis. These results demonstrate no improvement in response rate or survival with the addition of induction chemotherapy to CRT in unselected patients with ESCC. Trial number: NCT02403531. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8242031 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82420312021-07-20 Induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized phase II trial Liu, Shiliang Luo, Liling Zhao, Lei Zhu, Yujia Liu, Hui Li, Qiaoqiao Cai, Ling Hu, Yonghong Qiu, Bo Zhang, Li Shen, Jingxian Yang, Yadi Liu, Mengzhong Xi, Mian Nat Commun Article This randomized phase II trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus CRT alone in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) unsuitable for surgery (N = 110). The primary outcome was overall response rate (ORR), whereas the secondary outcome was overall survival. This trial did not meet pre-specified endpoints. The ORR was 74.5% in the induction chemotherapy group versus 61.8% in the CRT alone group (P = 0.152). The 3-year overall survival rate was 41.8% in the induction chemotherapy group and 38.1% in the CRT alone group (P = 0.584; hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.54–1.41). Grade 3–5 adverse events were similar. Patients who responded to induction chemotherapy had improved survival in the post-hoc analysis. These results demonstrate no improvement in response rate or survival with the addition of induction chemotherapy to CRT in unselected patients with ESCC. Trial number: NCT02403531. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8242031/ /pubmed/34188053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24288-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Liu, Shiliang Luo, Liling Zhao, Lei Zhu, Yujia Liu, Hui Li, Qiaoqiao Cai, Ling Hu, Yonghong Qiu, Bo Zhang, Li Shen, Jingxian Yang, Yadi Liu, Mengzhong Xi, Mian Induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized phase II trial |
title | Induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized phase II trial |
title_full | Induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized phase II trial |
title_fullStr | Induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized phase II trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized phase II trial |
title_short | Induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized phase II trial |
title_sort | induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized phase ii trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8242031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34188053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24288-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liushiliang inductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaarandomizedphaseiitrial AT luoliling inductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaarandomizedphaseiitrial AT zhaolei inductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaarandomizedphaseiitrial AT zhuyujia inductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaarandomizedphaseiitrial AT liuhui inductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaarandomizedphaseiitrial AT liqiaoqiao inductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaarandomizedphaseiitrial AT cailing inductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaarandomizedphaseiitrial AT huyonghong inductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaarandomizedphaseiitrial AT qiubo inductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaarandomizedphaseiitrial AT zhangli inductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaarandomizedphaseiitrial AT shenjingxian inductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaarandomizedphaseiitrial AT yangyadi inductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaarandomizedphaseiitrial AT liumengzhong inductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaarandomizedphaseiitrial AT ximian inductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaarandomizedphaseiitrial |