Cargando…

SARS‐CoV‐2 rapid antigen test: Fast‐safe or dangerous? An analysis in the emergency department of an university hospital

The use of Antigen point of care tests (AgPOCT) might be an essential tool to fight the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. Manufacturer information indicates a specificity of about 95% and there is a growing interest to use these tests area‐wide. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify whet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holzner, Carola, Pabst, Dirk, Anastasiou, Olympia Evdoxia, Dittmer, Ulf, Manegold, Randi Katrin, Risse, Joachim, Fistera, David, Kill, Clemens, Falk, Maximilian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8242658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33969499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27033
_version_ 1783715642021511168
author Holzner, Carola
Pabst, Dirk
Anastasiou, Olympia Evdoxia
Dittmer, Ulf
Manegold, Randi Katrin
Risse, Joachim
Fistera, David
Kill, Clemens
Falk, Maximilian
author_facet Holzner, Carola
Pabst, Dirk
Anastasiou, Olympia Evdoxia
Dittmer, Ulf
Manegold, Randi Katrin
Risse, Joachim
Fistera, David
Kill, Clemens
Falk, Maximilian
author_sort Holzner, Carola
collection PubMed
description The use of Antigen point of care tests (AgPOCT) might be an essential tool to fight the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. Manufacturer information indicates a specificity of about 95% and there is a growing interest to use these tests area‐wide. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify whether AgPOCT can be used safely for “rule‐in” (detection of positive patients) and for “rule‐out” (valid negative testing). Two thousand three hundred and seventy‐five patients received polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing and AgPOCT for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) regardless of symptoms. The positive predictive value of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients was compared with a cut‐off threshold cycle (C (t)) value of ≤30 and in total. Five hundrded and fifty‐one patients tested positive for the SARS‐CoV‐2 virus by PCR, of whom 35.2% presented without symptoms. In all patients, regardless of their symptoms or C (t) values, a sensitivity of 68.9% and a specificity of 99.6% were calculated for AgPOCT. In patients with C (t) values ≤30, a sensitivity of 80.5% (95% confidence interval: ±1.62) and a specificity of 99.6% were shown for all tests (symptomatic/asymptomatic). Highly infectious patients (C (t) ≤ 20), regardless of symptoms, were reliably detected by the AgPOCT. In infectious patients with C (t) values ≤30, the test has a sensitivity of about 80% regardless of COVID‐19 typical symptoms, which is apparently less than the 96.52% specificity indicated by the manufacturer. Relevant improvement in test sensitivity by querying the patients who are symptomatic and asymptomatic is also not feasible. We strongly suggest that we critically question the use of AgPOCT for “rule‐out,” as they only provide a supposed safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8242658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82426582021-07-01 SARS‐CoV‐2 rapid antigen test: Fast‐safe or dangerous? An analysis in the emergency department of an university hospital Holzner, Carola Pabst, Dirk Anastasiou, Olympia Evdoxia Dittmer, Ulf Manegold, Randi Katrin Risse, Joachim Fistera, David Kill, Clemens Falk, Maximilian J Med Virol Research Articles The use of Antigen point of care tests (AgPOCT) might be an essential tool to fight the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. Manufacturer information indicates a specificity of about 95% and there is a growing interest to use these tests area‐wide. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify whether AgPOCT can be used safely for “rule‐in” (detection of positive patients) and for “rule‐out” (valid negative testing). Two thousand three hundred and seventy‐five patients received polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing and AgPOCT for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) regardless of symptoms. The positive predictive value of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients was compared with a cut‐off threshold cycle (C (t)) value of ≤30 and in total. Five hundrded and fifty‐one patients tested positive for the SARS‐CoV‐2 virus by PCR, of whom 35.2% presented without symptoms. In all patients, regardless of their symptoms or C (t) values, a sensitivity of 68.9% and a specificity of 99.6% were calculated for AgPOCT. In patients with C (t) values ≤30, a sensitivity of 80.5% (95% confidence interval: ±1.62) and a specificity of 99.6% were shown for all tests (symptomatic/asymptomatic). Highly infectious patients (C (t) ≤ 20), regardless of symptoms, were reliably detected by the AgPOCT. In infectious patients with C (t) values ≤30, the test has a sensitivity of about 80% regardless of COVID‐19 typical symptoms, which is apparently less than the 96.52% specificity indicated by the manufacturer. Relevant improvement in test sensitivity by querying the patients who are symptomatic and asymptomatic is also not feasible. We strongly suggest that we critically question the use of AgPOCT for “rule‐out,” as they only provide a supposed safety. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-09 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8242658/ /pubmed/33969499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27033 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Medical Virology Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Holzner, Carola
Pabst, Dirk
Anastasiou, Olympia Evdoxia
Dittmer, Ulf
Manegold, Randi Katrin
Risse, Joachim
Fistera, David
Kill, Clemens
Falk, Maximilian
SARS‐CoV‐2 rapid antigen test: Fast‐safe or dangerous? An analysis in the emergency department of an university hospital
title SARS‐CoV‐2 rapid antigen test: Fast‐safe or dangerous? An analysis in the emergency department of an university hospital
title_full SARS‐CoV‐2 rapid antigen test: Fast‐safe or dangerous? An analysis in the emergency department of an university hospital
title_fullStr SARS‐CoV‐2 rapid antigen test: Fast‐safe or dangerous? An analysis in the emergency department of an university hospital
title_full_unstemmed SARS‐CoV‐2 rapid antigen test: Fast‐safe or dangerous? An analysis in the emergency department of an university hospital
title_short SARS‐CoV‐2 rapid antigen test: Fast‐safe or dangerous? An analysis in the emergency department of an university hospital
title_sort sars‐cov‐2 rapid antigen test: fast‐safe or dangerous? an analysis in the emergency department of an university hospital
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8242658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33969499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27033
work_keys_str_mv AT holznercarola sarscov2rapidantigentestfastsafeordangerousananalysisintheemergencydepartmentofanuniversityhospital
AT pabstdirk sarscov2rapidantigentestfastsafeordangerousananalysisintheemergencydepartmentofanuniversityhospital
AT anastasiouolympiaevdoxia sarscov2rapidantigentestfastsafeordangerousananalysisintheemergencydepartmentofanuniversityhospital
AT dittmerulf sarscov2rapidantigentestfastsafeordangerousananalysisintheemergencydepartmentofanuniversityhospital
AT manegoldrandikatrin sarscov2rapidantigentestfastsafeordangerousananalysisintheemergencydepartmentofanuniversityhospital
AT rissejoachim sarscov2rapidantigentestfastsafeordangerousananalysisintheemergencydepartmentofanuniversityhospital
AT fisteradavid sarscov2rapidantigentestfastsafeordangerousananalysisintheemergencydepartmentofanuniversityhospital
AT killclemens sarscov2rapidantigentestfastsafeordangerousananalysisintheemergencydepartmentofanuniversityhospital
AT falkmaximilian sarscov2rapidantigentestfastsafeordangerousananalysisintheemergencydepartmentofanuniversityhospital