Cargando…
A protocol for the evaluation of the process and impact of embedding formal and experiential Public and Patient Involvement training in a structured PhD programme
BACKGROUND: Incorporating Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) into doctoral research is valued by PhD scholars. The importance of providing early career researchers with appropriate education and training to develop skills to conduct meaningful involvement has been articulated. The Collaborative Do...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34262878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26335565211024793 |
_version_ | 1783715699102842880 |
---|---|
author | Foley, Louise Kiely, Bridget Croke, Aisling Larkin, James Smith, Susan M Clyne, Barbara Pierce, Maria Murphy, Edel |
author_facet | Foley, Louise Kiely, Bridget Croke, Aisling Larkin, James Smith, Susan M Clyne, Barbara Pierce, Maria Murphy, Edel |
author_sort | Foley, Louise |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Incorporating Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) into doctoral research is valued by PhD scholars. The importance of providing early career researchers with appropriate education and training to develop skills to conduct meaningful involvement has been articulated. The Collaborative Doctoral Award in MultiMorbidity (CDA-MM) PhD programme embedded formal PPI training as a postgraduate education component. Four PhD scholars taking part in the CDA-MM established a PPI panel comprising people, and carers of people, living with multimorbidity (≥2 chronic conditions), presenting an opportuning for experiential PPI training. The proposed study aims to evaluate the process and impact of formal and experiential PPI training during a PhD programme. DESIGN: Embedding PPI training in a PhD programme is a novel approach. This evaluation will include a process evaluation to provide an understanding of the workings of the PPI panel and explore the experiences of key stakeholders involved, and an impact evaluation to assess the impact of embedding PPI training in a PhD programme. This study is a longitudinal mixed-methods evaluation, conducted over 24 months. Participants include PhD scholars, PPI contributors and PhD supervisors. An independent researcher not aligned with the CDA-MM will lead the evaluation. Data collection methods include focus groups, individual interviews, an impact log and group reflections. Qualitative data will be analysed using thematic and content analysis and quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics. DISCUSSION: This evaluation will report the learnings from embedding formal and experiential PPI training and education across a PhD programme. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8243087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82430872021-07-13 A protocol for the evaluation of the process and impact of embedding formal and experiential Public and Patient Involvement training in a structured PhD programme Foley, Louise Kiely, Bridget Croke, Aisling Larkin, James Smith, Susan M Clyne, Barbara Pierce, Maria Murphy, Edel J Comorb Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Incorporating Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) into doctoral research is valued by PhD scholars. The importance of providing early career researchers with appropriate education and training to develop skills to conduct meaningful involvement has been articulated. The Collaborative Doctoral Award in MultiMorbidity (CDA-MM) PhD programme embedded formal PPI training as a postgraduate education component. Four PhD scholars taking part in the CDA-MM established a PPI panel comprising people, and carers of people, living with multimorbidity (≥2 chronic conditions), presenting an opportuning for experiential PPI training. The proposed study aims to evaluate the process and impact of formal and experiential PPI training during a PhD programme. DESIGN: Embedding PPI training in a PhD programme is a novel approach. This evaluation will include a process evaluation to provide an understanding of the workings of the PPI panel and explore the experiences of key stakeholders involved, and an impact evaluation to assess the impact of embedding PPI training in a PhD programme. This study is a longitudinal mixed-methods evaluation, conducted over 24 months. Participants include PhD scholars, PPI contributors and PhD supervisors. An independent researcher not aligned with the CDA-MM will lead the evaluation. Data collection methods include focus groups, individual interviews, an impact log and group reflections. Qualitative data will be analysed using thematic and content analysis and quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics. DISCUSSION: This evaluation will report the learnings from embedding formal and experiential PPI training and education across a PhD programme. SAGE Publications 2021-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8243087/ /pubmed/34262878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26335565211024793 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Foley, Louise Kiely, Bridget Croke, Aisling Larkin, James Smith, Susan M Clyne, Barbara Pierce, Maria Murphy, Edel A protocol for the evaluation of the process and impact of embedding formal and experiential Public and Patient Involvement training in a structured PhD programme |
title | A protocol for the evaluation of the process and impact of embedding
formal and experiential Public and Patient Involvement training in a structured
PhD programme |
title_full | A protocol for the evaluation of the process and impact of embedding
formal and experiential Public and Patient Involvement training in a structured
PhD programme |
title_fullStr | A protocol for the evaluation of the process and impact of embedding
formal and experiential Public and Patient Involvement training in a structured
PhD programme |
title_full_unstemmed | A protocol for the evaluation of the process and impact of embedding
formal and experiential Public and Patient Involvement training in a structured
PhD programme |
title_short | A protocol for the evaluation of the process and impact of embedding
formal and experiential Public and Patient Involvement training in a structured
PhD programme |
title_sort | protocol for the evaluation of the process and impact of embedding
formal and experiential public and patient involvement training in a structured
phd programme |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34262878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26335565211024793 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT foleylouise aprotocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme AT kielybridget aprotocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme AT crokeaisling aprotocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme AT larkinjames aprotocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme AT smithsusanm aprotocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme AT clynebarbara aprotocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme AT piercemaria aprotocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme AT murphyedel aprotocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme AT aprotocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme AT foleylouise protocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme AT kielybridget protocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme AT crokeaisling protocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme AT larkinjames protocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme AT smithsusanm protocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme AT clynebarbara protocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme AT piercemaria protocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme AT murphyedel protocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme AT protocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme |