Cargando…

A protocol for the evaluation of the process and impact of embedding formal and experiential Public and Patient Involvement training in a structured PhD programme

BACKGROUND: Incorporating Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) into doctoral research is valued by PhD scholars. The importance of providing early career researchers with appropriate education and training to develop skills to conduct meaningful involvement has been articulated. The Collaborative Do...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foley, Louise, Kiely, Bridget, Croke, Aisling, Larkin, James, Smith, Susan M, Clyne, Barbara, Pierce, Maria, Murphy, Edel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34262878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26335565211024793
_version_ 1783715699102842880
author Foley, Louise
Kiely, Bridget
Croke, Aisling
Larkin, James
Smith, Susan M
Clyne, Barbara
Pierce, Maria
Murphy, Edel
author_facet Foley, Louise
Kiely, Bridget
Croke, Aisling
Larkin, James
Smith, Susan M
Clyne, Barbara
Pierce, Maria
Murphy, Edel
author_sort Foley, Louise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Incorporating Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) into doctoral research is valued by PhD scholars. The importance of providing early career researchers with appropriate education and training to develop skills to conduct meaningful involvement has been articulated. The Collaborative Doctoral Award in MultiMorbidity (CDA-MM) PhD programme embedded formal PPI training as a postgraduate education component. Four PhD scholars taking part in the CDA-MM established a PPI panel comprising people, and carers of people, living with multimorbidity (≥2 chronic conditions), presenting an opportuning for experiential PPI training. The proposed study aims to evaluate the process and impact of formal and experiential PPI training during a PhD programme. DESIGN: Embedding PPI training in a PhD programme is a novel approach. This evaluation will include a process evaluation to provide an understanding of the workings of the PPI panel and explore the experiences of key stakeholders involved, and an impact evaluation to assess the impact of embedding PPI training in a PhD programme. This study is a longitudinal mixed-methods evaluation, conducted over 24 months. Participants include PhD scholars, PPI contributors and PhD supervisors. An independent researcher not aligned with the CDA-MM will lead the evaluation. Data collection methods include focus groups, individual interviews, an impact log and group reflections. Qualitative data will be analysed using thematic and content analysis and quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics. DISCUSSION: This evaluation will report the learnings from embedding formal and experiential PPI training and education across a PhD programme.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8243087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82430872021-07-13 A protocol for the evaluation of the process and impact of embedding formal and experiential Public and Patient Involvement training in a structured PhD programme Foley, Louise Kiely, Bridget Croke, Aisling Larkin, James Smith, Susan M Clyne, Barbara Pierce, Maria Murphy, Edel J Comorb Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Incorporating Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) into doctoral research is valued by PhD scholars. The importance of providing early career researchers with appropriate education and training to develop skills to conduct meaningful involvement has been articulated. The Collaborative Doctoral Award in MultiMorbidity (CDA-MM) PhD programme embedded formal PPI training as a postgraduate education component. Four PhD scholars taking part in the CDA-MM established a PPI panel comprising people, and carers of people, living with multimorbidity (≥2 chronic conditions), presenting an opportuning for experiential PPI training. The proposed study aims to evaluate the process and impact of formal and experiential PPI training during a PhD programme. DESIGN: Embedding PPI training in a PhD programme is a novel approach. This evaluation will include a process evaluation to provide an understanding of the workings of the PPI panel and explore the experiences of key stakeholders involved, and an impact evaluation to assess the impact of embedding PPI training in a PhD programme. This study is a longitudinal mixed-methods evaluation, conducted over 24 months. Participants include PhD scholars, PPI contributors and PhD supervisors. An independent researcher not aligned with the CDA-MM will lead the evaluation. Data collection methods include focus groups, individual interviews, an impact log and group reflections. Qualitative data will be analysed using thematic and content analysis and quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics. DISCUSSION: This evaluation will report the learnings from embedding formal and experiential PPI training and education across a PhD programme. SAGE Publications 2021-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8243087/ /pubmed/34262878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26335565211024793 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Foley, Louise
Kiely, Bridget
Croke, Aisling
Larkin, James
Smith, Susan M
Clyne, Barbara
Pierce, Maria
Murphy, Edel
A protocol for the evaluation of the process and impact of embedding formal and experiential Public and Patient Involvement training in a structured PhD programme
title A protocol for the evaluation of the process and impact of embedding formal and experiential Public and Patient Involvement training in a structured PhD programme
title_full A protocol for the evaluation of the process and impact of embedding formal and experiential Public and Patient Involvement training in a structured PhD programme
title_fullStr A protocol for the evaluation of the process and impact of embedding formal and experiential Public and Patient Involvement training in a structured PhD programme
title_full_unstemmed A protocol for the evaluation of the process and impact of embedding formal and experiential Public and Patient Involvement training in a structured PhD programme
title_short A protocol for the evaluation of the process and impact of embedding formal and experiential Public and Patient Involvement training in a structured PhD programme
title_sort protocol for the evaluation of the process and impact of embedding formal and experiential public and patient involvement training in a structured phd programme
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34262878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26335565211024793
work_keys_str_mv AT foleylouise aprotocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme
AT kielybridget aprotocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme
AT crokeaisling aprotocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme
AT larkinjames aprotocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme
AT smithsusanm aprotocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme
AT clynebarbara aprotocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme
AT piercemaria aprotocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme
AT murphyedel aprotocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme
AT aprotocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme
AT foleylouise protocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme
AT kielybridget protocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme
AT crokeaisling protocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme
AT larkinjames protocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme
AT smithsusanm protocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme
AT clynebarbara protocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme
AT piercemaria protocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme
AT murphyedel protocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme
AT protocolfortheevaluationoftheprocessandimpactofembeddingformalandexperientialpublicandpatientinvolvementtraininginastructuredphdprogramme