Cargando…

Association of Costs and Days at Home With Transfer Hospital in Home

IMPORTANCE: New Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services waivers created a payment mechanism for hospital at home services. Although it is well established that direct admission to hospital at home from the community as a substitute for hospital care provides superior outcomes and lower cost, th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cai, Shubing, Intrator, Orna, Chan, Caitlin, Buxbaum, Laurence, Haggerty, Mary Ann, Phibbs, Ciaran S., Schwab, Edna, Kinosian, Bruce
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34185069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14920
_version_ 1783715719855210496
author Cai, Shubing
Intrator, Orna
Chan, Caitlin
Buxbaum, Laurence
Haggerty, Mary Ann
Phibbs, Ciaran S.
Schwab, Edna
Kinosian, Bruce
author_facet Cai, Shubing
Intrator, Orna
Chan, Caitlin
Buxbaum, Laurence
Haggerty, Mary Ann
Phibbs, Ciaran S.
Schwab, Edna
Kinosian, Bruce
author_sort Cai, Shubing
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: New Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services waivers created a payment mechanism for hospital at home services. Although it is well established that direct admission to hospital at home from the community as a substitute for hospital care provides superior outcomes and lower cost, the effectiveness of transfer hospital at home—that is, completing hospitalization at home—is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of the transfer component of a Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital in Home program (T-HIH), taking advantage of natural geographical limitations in a program’s service area. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this quality improvement study, T-HIH was offered to veterans residing in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and their outcomes were compared with those of propensity-matched veterans residing in adjacent Camden, New Jersey, who were admitted to the VA hospital from 2012 to 2018. Data analysis was performed from October 2019 to May 2020. INTERVENTION: Enrollment in the T-HIH program. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcomes were hospital length of stay, 30-day and 90-day readmissions, VA direct costs, combined VA and Medicare costs, mortality, 90-day nursing home use, and days at home after hospital discharge. An intent-to-treat analysis of cost and utilization was performed. RESULTS: A total of 405 veterans (mean [SD] age, 66.7 [0.83] years; 399 men [98.5%]) with medically complex conditions, primarily congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations (mean [SD] hierarchical condition categories score, 3.54 [0.16]), were enrolled. Ten participants could not be matched, so analyses were performed for 395 veterans (all of whom were men), 98 in the T-HIH group and 297 in the control group. For patients in the T-HIH group compared with the control group, length of stay was 20% lower (6.1 vs 7.7 days; difference, 1.6 days; 95% CI, −3.77 to 0.61 days), VA costs were 20% lower (−$5910; 95% CI, −$13 049 to $1229), combined VA and Medicare costs were 22% lower (−$7002; 95% CI, −$14 314 to $309), readmission rates were similar (23.7% vs 23.0%), the numbers of nursing home days were significantly fewer (0.92 vs 7.45 days; difference, −6.5 days; 95% CI, −12.1 to −0.96 days; P = .02), and the number of days at home was 18% higher (81.4 vs 68.8 days; difference, 12.6 days; 95% CI, 3.12 to 22.08 days; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, T-HIH was significantly associated with increased days at home and less nursing home use but was not associated with increased health care system costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8243231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82432312021-07-13 Association of Costs and Days at Home With Transfer Hospital in Home Cai, Shubing Intrator, Orna Chan, Caitlin Buxbaum, Laurence Haggerty, Mary Ann Phibbs, Ciaran S. Schwab, Edna Kinosian, Bruce JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: New Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services waivers created a payment mechanism for hospital at home services. Although it is well established that direct admission to hospital at home from the community as a substitute for hospital care provides superior outcomes and lower cost, the effectiveness of transfer hospital at home—that is, completing hospitalization at home—is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of the transfer component of a Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital in Home program (T-HIH), taking advantage of natural geographical limitations in a program’s service area. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this quality improvement study, T-HIH was offered to veterans residing in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and their outcomes were compared with those of propensity-matched veterans residing in adjacent Camden, New Jersey, who were admitted to the VA hospital from 2012 to 2018. Data analysis was performed from October 2019 to May 2020. INTERVENTION: Enrollment in the T-HIH program. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcomes were hospital length of stay, 30-day and 90-day readmissions, VA direct costs, combined VA and Medicare costs, mortality, 90-day nursing home use, and days at home after hospital discharge. An intent-to-treat analysis of cost and utilization was performed. RESULTS: A total of 405 veterans (mean [SD] age, 66.7 [0.83] years; 399 men [98.5%]) with medically complex conditions, primarily congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations (mean [SD] hierarchical condition categories score, 3.54 [0.16]), were enrolled. Ten participants could not be matched, so analyses were performed for 395 veterans (all of whom were men), 98 in the T-HIH group and 297 in the control group. For patients in the T-HIH group compared with the control group, length of stay was 20% lower (6.1 vs 7.7 days; difference, 1.6 days; 95% CI, −3.77 to 0.61 days), VA costs were 20% lower (−$5910; 95% CI, −$13 049 to $1229), combined VA and Medicare costs were 22% lower (−$7002; 95% CI, −$14 314 to $309), readmission rates were similar (23.7% vs 23.0%), the numbers of nursing home days were significantly fewer (0.92 vs 7.45 days; difference, −6.5 days; 95% CI, −12.1 to −0.96 days; P = .02), and the number of days at home was 18% higher (81.4 vs 68.8 days; difference, 12.6 days; 95% CI, 3.12 to 22.08 days; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, T-HIH was significantly associated with increased days at home and less nursing home use but was not associated with increased health care system costs. American Medical Association 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8243231/ /pubmed/34185069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14920 Text en Copyright 2021 Cai S et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Cai, Shubing
Intrator, Orna
Chan, Caitlin
Buxbaum, Laurence
Haggerty, Mary Ann
Phibbs, Ciaran S.
Schwab, Edna
Kinosian, Bruce
Association of Costs and Days at Home With Transfer Hospital in Home
title Association of Costs and Days at Home With Transfer Hospital in Home
title_full Association of Costs and Days at Home With Transfer Hospital in Home
title_fullStr Association of Costs and Days at Home With Transfer Hospital in Home
title_full_unstemmed Association of Costs and Days at Home With Transfer Hospital in Home
title_short Association of Costs and Days at Home With Transfer Hospital in Home
title_sort association of costs and days at home with transfer hospital in home
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34185069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14920
work_keys_str_mv AT caishubing associationofcostsanddaysathomewithtransferhospitalinhome
AT intratororna associationofcostsanddaysathomewithtransferhospitalinhome
AT chancaitlin associationofcostsanddaysathomewithtransferhospitalinhome
AT buxbaumlaurence associationofcostsanddaysathomewithtransferhospitalinhome
AT haggertymaryann associationofcostsanddaysathomewithtransferhospitalinhome
AT phibbsciarans associationofcostsanddaysathomewithtransferhospitalinhome
AT schwabedna associationofcostsanddaysathomewithtransferhospitalinhome
AT kinosianbruce associationofcostsanddaysathomewithtransferhospitalinhome