Cargando…
Association of Costs and Days at Home With Transfer Hospital in Home
IMPORTANCE: New Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services waivers created a payment mechanism for hospital at home services. Although it is well established that direct admission to hospital at home from the community as a substitute for hospital care provides superior outcomes and lower cost, th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34185069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14920 |
_version_ | 1783715719855210496 |
---|---|
author | Cai, Shubing Intrator, Orna Chan, Caitlin Buxbaum, Laurence Haggerty, Mary Ann Phibbs, Ciaran S. Schwab, Edna Kinosian, Bruce |
author_facet | Cai, Shubing Intrator, Orna Chan, Caitlin Buxbaum, Laurence Haggerty, Mary Ann Phibbs, Ciaran S. Schwab, Edna Kinosian, Bruce |
author_sort | Cai, Shubing |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: New Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services waivers created a payment mechanism for hospital at home services. Although it is well established that direct admission to hospital at home from the community as a substitute for hospital care provides superior outcomes and lower cost, the effectiveness of transfer hospital at home—that is, completing hospitalization at home—is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of the transfer component of a Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital in Home program (T-HIH), taking advantage of natural geographical limitations in a program’s service area. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this quality improvement study, T-HIH was offered to veterans residing in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and their outcomes were compared with those of propensity-matched veterans residing in adjacent Camden, New Jersey, who were admitted to the VA hospital from 2012 to 2018. Data analysis was performed from October 2019 to May 2020. INTERVENTION: Enrollment in the T-HIH program. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcomes were hospital length of stay, 30-day and 90-day readmissions, VA direct costs, combined VA and Medicare costs, mortality, 90-day nursing home use, and days at home after hospital discharge. An intent-to-treat analysis of cost and utilization was performed. RESULTS: A total of 405 veterans (mean [SD] age, 66.7 [0.83] years; 399 men [98.5%]) with medically complex conditions, primarily congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations (mean [SD] hierarchical condition categories score, 3.54 [0.16]), were enrolled. Ten participants could not be matched, so analyses were performed for 395 veterans (all of whom were men), 98 in the T-HIH group and 297 in the control group. For patients in the T-HIH group compared with the control group, length of stay was 20% lower (6.1 vs 7.7 days; difference, 1.6 days; 95% CI, −3.77 to 0.61 days), VA costs were 20% lower (−$5910; 95% CI, −$13 049 to $1229), combined VA and Medicare costs were 22% lower (−$7002; 95% CI, −$14 314 to $309), readmission rates were similar (23.7% vs 23.0%), the numbers of nursing home days were significantly fewer (0.92 vs 7.45 days; difference, −6.5 days; 95% CI, −12.1 to −0.96 days; P = .02), and the number of days at home was 18% higher (81.4 vs 68.8 days; difference, 12.6 days; 95% CI, 3.12 to 22.08 days; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, T-HIH was significantly associated with increased days at home and less nursing home use but was not associated with increased health care system costs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8243231 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82432312021-07-13 Association of Costs and Days at Home With Transfer Hospital in Home Cai, Shubing Intrator, Orna Chan, Caitlin Buxbaum, Laurence Haggerty, Mary Ann Phibbs, Ciaran S. Schwab, Edna Kinosian, Bruce JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: New Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services waivers created a payment mechanism for hospital at home services. Although it is well established that direct admission to hospital at home from the community as a substitute for hospital care provides superior outcomes and lower cost, the effectiveness of transfer hospital at home—that is, completing hospitalization at home—is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of the transfer component of a Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital in Home program (T-HIH), taking advantage of natural geographical limitations in a program’s service area. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this quality improvement study, T-HIH was offered to veterans residing in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and their outcomes were compared with those of propensity-matched veterans residing in adjacent Camden, New Jersey, who were admitted to the VA hospital from 2012 to 2018. Data analysis was performed from October 2019 to May 2020. INTERVENTION: Enrollment in the T-HIH program. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcomes were hospital length of stay, 30-day and 90-day readmissions, VA direct costs, combined VA and Medicare costs, mortality, 90-day nursing home use, and days at home after hospital discharge. An intent-to-treat analysis of cost and utilization was performed. RESULTS: A total of 405 veterans (mean [SD] age, 66.7 [0.83] years; 399 men [98.5%]) with medically complex conditions, primarily congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations (mean [SD] hierarchical condition categories score, 3.54 [0.16]), were enrolled. Ten participants could not be matched, so analyses were performed for 395 veterans (all of whom were men), 98 in the T-HIH group and 297 in the control group. For patients in the T-HIH group compared with the control group, length of stay was 20% lower (6.1 vs 7.7 days; difference, 1.6 days; 95% CI, −3.77 to 0.61 days), VA costs were 20% lower (−$5910; 95% CI, −$13 049 to $1229), combined VA and Medicare costs were 22% lower (−$7002; 95% CI, −$14 314 to $309), readmission rates were similar (23.7% vs 23.0%), the numbers of nursing home days were significantly fewer (0.92 vs 7.45 days; difference, −6.5 days; 95% CI, −12.1 to −0.96 days; P = .02), and the number of days at home was 18% higher (81.4 vs 68.8 days; difference, 12.6 days; 95% CI, 3.12 to 22.08 days; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, T-HIH was significantly associated with increased days at home and less nursing home use but was not associated with increased health care system costs. American Medical Association 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8243231/ /pubmed/34185069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14920 Text en Copyright 2021 Cai S et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Cai, Shubing Intrator, Orna Chan, Caitlin Buxbaum, Laurence Haggerty, Mary Ann Phibbs, Ciaran S. Schwab, Edna Kinosian, Bruce Association of Costs and Days at Home With Transfer Hospital in Home |
title | Association of Costs and Days at Home With Transfer Hospital in Home |
title_full | Association of Costs and Days at Home With Transfer Hospital in Home |
title_fullStr | Association of Costs and Days at Home With Transfer Hospital in Home |
title_full_unstemmed | Association of Costs and Days at Home With Transfer Hospital in Home |
title_short | Association of Costs and Days at Home With Transfer Hospital in Home |
title_sort | association of costs and days at home with transfer hospital in home |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34185069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14920 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caishubing associationofcostsanddaysathomewithtransferhospitalinhome AT intratororna associationofcostsanddaysathomewithtransferhospitalinhome AT chancaitlin associationofcostsanddaysathomewithtransferhospitalinhome AT buxbaumlaurence associationofcostsanddaysathomewithtransferhospitalinhome AT haggertymaryann associationofcostsanddaysathomewithtransferhospitalinhome AT phibbsciarans associationofcostsanddaysathomewithtransferhospitalinhome AT schwabedna associationofcostsanddaysathomewithtransferhospitalinhome AT kinosianbruce associationofcostsanddaysathomewithtransferhospitalinhome |