Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of the Thermo fisher TaqPath™ COVID-19 combo kit with the Cepheid Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal specimens
PURPOSE: With over 50 SARS-CoV-2 gene amplification assays that have been EUA cleared with minimal experimental validation performed, it is likely that not all of these assays are comparable in their ability to detect SARS-CoV-2 in clinical specimens. Thermo Fisher Scientific is a relatively new com...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34193072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06347-6 |
_version_ | 1783715730972213248 |
---|---|
author | Granato, Paul A. Kimball, Simon R. Alkins, Brenda R. Cross, Deirdre C. Unz, Melissa M. |
author_facet | Granato, Paul A. Kimball, Simon R. Alkins, Brenda R. Cross, Deirdre C. Unz, Melissa M. |
author_sort | Granato, Paul A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: With over 50 SARS-CoV-2 gene amplification assays that have been EUA cleared with minimal experimental validation performed, it is likely that not all of these assays are comparable in their ability to detect SARS-CoV-2 in clinical specimens. Thermo Fisher Scientific is a relatively new company in the molecular diagnostics field and the purpose of this study was to compare the performance of the Thermo Fisher TaqPath™ Combo Kit with an established test, the Cepheid Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay, for its ability to detect SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal specimens. METHODS: A total of 300 randomly selected nasopharyngeal specimens were evaluated and tested by the TaqPath and GeneXpert assays. Discordant test specimens were arbitrated by performing an alternative PCR assay and Sanger sequencing. RESULTS: The TaqPath assay had a 96.7 and 99.6% positive and negative agreement respectively when compared to the Xpert Xpress test. However, after test arbitration, the three discordant specimens were arbitrated in favor of the TaqPath assay producing a positive and negative percent agreement of 100% for the TaqPath Combo Kit while the Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay had a positive and negative percent agreement of 98.3 and 99.2% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The TaqPath Combo Kit is a high complexity assay that compares favorably with the Xpert Xpress test and can be reliably used for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal specimens. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8243295 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82432952021-06-30 Comparative evaluation of the Thermo fisher TaqPath™ COVID-19 combo kit with the Cepheid Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal specimens Granato, Paul A. Kimball, Simon R. Alkins, Brenda R. Cross, Deirdre C. Unz, Melissa M. BMC Infect Dis Research PURPOSE: With over 50 SARS-CoV-2 gene amplification assays that have been EUA cleared with minimal experimental validation performed, it is likely that not all of these assays are comparable in their ability to detect SARS-CoV-2 in clinical specimens. Thermo Fisher Scientific is a relatively new company in the molecular diagnostics field and the purpose of this study was to compare the performance of the Thermo Fisher TaqPath™ Combo Kit with an established test, the Cepheid Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay, for its ability to detect SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal specimens. METHODS: A total of 300 randomly selected nasopharyngeal specimens were evaluated and tested by the TaqPath and GeneXpert assays. Discordant test specimens were arbitrated by performing an alternative PCR assay and Sanger sequencing. RESULTS: The TaqPath assay had a 96.7 and 99.6% positive and negative agreement respectively when compared to the Xpert Xpress test. However, after test arbitration, the three discordant specimens were arbitrated in favor of the TaqPath assay producing a positive and negative percent agreement of 100% for the TaqPath Combo Kit while the Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay had a positive and negative percent agreement of 98.3 and 99.2% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The TaqPath Combo Kit is a high complexity assay that compares favorably with the Xpert Xpress test and can be reliably used for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal specimens. BioMed Central 2021-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8243295/ /pubmed/34193072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06347-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Granato, Paul A. Kimball, Simon R. Alkins, Brenda R. Cross, Deirdre C. Unz, Melissa M. Comparative evaluation of the Thermo fisher TaqPath™ COVID-19 combo kit with the Cepheid Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal specimens |
title | Comparative evaluation of the Thermo fisher TaqPath™ COVID-19 combo kit with the Cepheid Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal specimens |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of the Thermo fisher TaqPath™ COVID-19 combo kit with the Cepheid Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal specimens |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of the Thermo fisher TaqPath™ COVID-19 combo kit with the Cepheid Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal specimens |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of the Thermo fisher TaqPath™ COVID-19 combo kit with the Cepheid Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal specimens |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of the Thermo fisher TaqPath™ COVID-19 combo kit with the Cepheid Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal specimens |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of the thermo fisher taqpath™ covid-19 combo kit with the cepheid xpert® xpress sars-cov-2 assay for detecting sars-cov-2 in nasopharyngeal specimens |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34193072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06347-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT granatopaula comparativeevaluationofthethermofishertaqpathcovid19combokitwiththecepheidxpertxpresssarscov2assayfordetectingsarscov2innasopharyngealspecimens AT kimballsimonr comparativeevaluationofthethermofishertaqpathcovid19combokitwiththecepheidxpertxpresssarscov2assayfordetectingsarscov2innasopharyngealspecimens AT alkinsbrendar comparativeevaluationofthethermofishertaqpathcovid19combokitwiththecepheidxpertxpresssarscov2assayfordetectingsarscov2innasopharyngealspecimens AT crossdeirdrec comparativeevaluationofthethermofishertaqpathcovid19combokitwiththecepheidxpertxpresssarscov2assayfordetectingsarscov2innasopharyngealspecimens AT unzmelissam comparativeevaluationofthethermofishertaqpathcovid19combokitwiththecepheidxpertxpresssarscov2assayfordetectingsarscov2innasopharyngealspecimens |