Cargando…

Speed versus damage: using selective feedback to modulate laparoscopic simulator performance

BACKGROUND: Adaptive training is an approach in which training variables change with the needs and traits of individual trainees. It has potential to mitigate the effect of personality traits such as impulsiveness on surgical performance. Selective performance feedback is one way to implement adapti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kengen, Bas, IJgosse, Wouter M., van Goor, Harry, Luursema, Jan-Maarten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34187596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02789-3
_version_ 1783715747439050752
author Kengen, Bas
IJgosse, Wouter M.
van Goor, Harry
Luursema, Jan-Maarten
author_facet Kengen, Bas
IJgosse, Wouter M.
van Goor, Harry
Luursema, Jan-Maarten
author_sort Kengen, Bas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adaptive training is an approach in which training variables change with the needs and traits of individual trainees. It has potential to mitigate the effect of personality traits such as impulsiveness on surgical performance. Selective performance feedback is one way to implement adaptive training. This paper investigates whether selective feedback can direct performance of trainees of either high- or low impulsiveness. METHODS: A total of 83 inexperienced medical students of known impulsiveness performed a four-session laparoscopic training course on a Virtual Reality Simulator. They performed two identical series of tasks every session. During one series of tasks they received performance feedback on duration and during the other series they received feedback on damage. Performance parameters (duration and damage) were compared between the two series of tasks to assess whether selective performance feedback can be used to steer emphasis in performance. To assess the effectiveness of selective feedback for people of high- or low impulsiveness, the difference in performance between the two series for both duration and damage was also assessed. RESULTS: Participants were faster when given performance feedback for speed for all exercises in all sessions (average z-value = − 4.14, all p values < .05). Also, they performed better on damage control when given performance feedback for damage in all tasks and during all sessions except for one (average z-value = − 4.19, all but one p value < .05). Impulsiveness did not impact the effectiveness of selective feedback. CONCLUSION: Selective feedback on either duration or damage can be used to improve performance for the variable that the trainee receives feedback on. Trainee impulsiveness did not modulate this effect. Selective feedback can be used to steer training focus in adaptive training systems and can mitigate the negative effects of impulsiveness on damage control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8243418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82434182021-06-30 Speed versus damage: using selective feedback to modulate laparoscopic simulator performance Kengen, Bas IJgosse, Wouter M. van Goor, Harry Luursema, Jan-Maarten BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Adaptive training is an approach in which training variables change with the needs and traits of individual trainees. It has potential to mitigate the effect of personality traits such as impulsiveness on surgical performance. Selective performance feedback is one way to implement adaptive training. This paper investigates whether selective feedback can direct performance of trainees of either high- or low impulsiveness. METHODS: A total of 83 inexperienced medical students of known impulsiveness performed a four-session laparoscopic training course on a Virtual Reality Simulator. They performed two identical series of tasks every session. During one series of tasks they received performance feedback on duration and during the other series they received feedback on damage. Performance parameters (duration and damage) were compared between the two series of tasks to assess whether selective performance feedback can be used to steer emphasis in performance. To assess the effectiveness of selective feedback for people of high- or low impulsiveness, the difference in performance between the two series for both duration and damage was also assessed. RESULTS: Participants were faster when given performance feedback for speed for all exercises in all sessions (average z-value = − 4.14, all p values < .05). Also, they performed better on damage control when given performance feedback for damage in all tasks and during all sessions except for one (average z-value = − 4.19, all but one p value < .05). Impulsiveness did not impact the effectiveness of selective feedback. CONCLUSION: Selective feedback on either duration or damage can be used to improve performance for the variable that the trainee receives feedback on. Trainee impulsiveness did not modulate this effect. Selective feedback can be used to steer training focus in adaptive training systems and can mitigate the negative effects of impulsiveness on damage control. BioMed Central 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8243418/ /pubmed/34187596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02789-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kengen, Bas
IJgosse, Wouter M.
van Goor, Harry
Luursema, Jan-Maarten
Speed versus damage: using selective feedback to modulate laparoscopic simulator performance
title Speed versus damage: using selective feedback to modulate laparoscopic simulator performance
title_full Speed versus damage: using selective feedback to modulate laparoscopic simulator performance
title_fullStr Speed versus damage: using selective feedback to modulate laparoscopic simulator performance
title_full_unstemmed Speed versus damage: using selective feedback to modulate laparoscopic simulator performance
title_short Speed versus damage: using selective feedback to modulate laparoscopic simulator performance
title_sort speed versus damage: using selective feedback to modulate laparoscopic simulator performance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34187596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02789-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kengenbas speedversusdamageusingselectivefeedbacktomodulatelaparoscopicsimulatorperformance
AT ijgossewouterm speedversusdamageusingselectivefeedbacktomodulatelaparoscopicsimulatorperformance
AT vangoorharry speedversusdamageusingselectivefeedbacktomodulatelaparoscopicsimulatorperformance
AT luursemajanmaarten speedversusdamageusingselectivefeedbacktomodulatelaparoscopicsimulatorperformance