Cargando…
Determinants of macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness in normal Chinese adults
BACKGROUND: Demographic, systemic and ocular factors may impact macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness measurements. This study aimed to investigate the influences of multiple potential determinants of macular GCIPL thickness in normal Chinese adults. METHODS: This was a retro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34187398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-02023-0 |
_version_ | 1783715748132159488 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Xiaoyu Xiao, Hui Lai, Kunbei Guo, Xinxing Luo, Jingyi Liu, Xing |
author_facet | Xu, Xiaoyu Xiao, Hui Lai, Kunbei Guo, Xinxing Luo, Jingyi Liu, Xing |
author_sort | Xu, Xiaoyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Demographic, systemic and ocular factors may impact macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness measurements. This study aimed to investigate the influences of multiple potential determinants of macular GCIPL thickness in normal Chinese adults. METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted on 225 normal eyes from 225 healthy Chinese adults. GCIPL thickness were obtained using Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography (OCT). The age, gender, laterality, spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error, intraocular pressure (IOP), axial length (AL), central cornea thickness (CCT), circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (pRNFL) thickness and OCT signal strength were recorded and their respective effect on GCIPL thickness parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean (± SD) average, minimum, superotemporal, superior, superonasal, inferonasal, inferior, and inferotemporal GCIPL thickness was 84.56 ± 5.36, 81.32 ± 5.58, 83.08 ± 5.37, 85.70 ± 5.95, 87.15 ± 6.26, 85.07 ± 6.11, 82.46 ± 5.76, and 83.88 ± 5.59 μm, respectively. Determinants of thinner GCIPL thickness were older age (P = 0.001–0.117; effects enhanced if age over 40 years), thinner pRNFL (all P < 0.001), and weaker signal strength (all P < 0.001). No significant difference was found between males and females (P = 0.069–0.842), and between right eyes and the left eyes (P = 0.160–0.875) except that of superonasal GCIPL thickness (P < 0.001). There was no significant correlation between GCIPL thickness and SE, IOP, CCT, and AL (P = 0.135–0.968). CONCLUSIONS: Individual determinants associated with thinner GCIPL thickness were older age (particularly over 40 years of age), thinner pRNFL, and weaker OCT signal strength. This is relevant in comprehensively understanding the normative data and differentiating normal aging from abnormalities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8243422 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82434222021-06-30 Determinants of macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness in normal Chinese adults Xu, Xiaoyu Xiao, Hui Lai, Kunbei Guo, Xinxing Luo, Jingyi Liu, Xing BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: Demographic, systemic and ocular factors may impact macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness measurements. This study aimed to investigate the influences of multiple potential determinants of macular GCIPL thickness in normal Chinese adults. METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted on 225 normal eyes from 225 healthy Chinese adults. GCIPL thickness were obtained using Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography (OCT). The age, gender, laterality, spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error, intraocular pressure (IOP), axial length (AL), central cornea thickness (CCT), circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (pRNFL) thickness and OCT signal strength were recorded and their respective effect on GCIPL thickness parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean (± SD) average, minimum, superotemporal, superior, superonasal, inferonasal, inferior, and inferotemporal GCIPL thickness was 84.56 ± 5.36, 81.32 ± 5.58, 83.08 ± 5.37, 85.70 ± 5.95, 87.15 ± 6.26, 85.07 ± 6.11, 82.46 ± 5.76, and 83.88 ± 5.59 μm, respectively. Determinants of thinner GCIPL thickness were older age (P = 0.001–0.117; effects enhanced if age over 40 years), thinner pRNFL (all P < 0.001), and weaker signal strength (all P < 0.001). No significant difference was found between males and females (P = 0.069–0.842), and between right eyes and the left eyes (P = 0.160–0.875) except that of superonasal GCIPL thickness (P < 0.001). There was no significant correlation between GCIPL thickness and SE, IOP, CCT, and AL (P = 0.135–0.968). CONCLUSIONS: Individual determinants associated with thinner GCIPL thickness were older age (particularly over 40 years of age), thinner pRNFL, and weaker OCT signal strength. This is relevant in comprehensively understanding the normative data and differentiating normal aging from abnormalities. BioMed Central 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8243422/ /pubmed/34187398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-02023-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Xu, Xiaoyu Xiao, Hui Lai, Kunbei Guo, Xinxing Luo, Jingyi Liu, Xing Determinants of macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness in normal Chinese adults |
title | Determinants of macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness in normal Chinese adults |
title_full | Determinants of macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness in normal Chinese adults |
title_fullStr | Determinants of macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness in normal Chinese adults |
title_full_unstemmed | Determinants of macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness in normal Chinese adults |
title_short | Determinants of macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness in normal Chinese adults |
title_sort | determinants of macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness in normal chinese adults |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34187398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-02023-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xuxiaoyu determinantsofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessinnormalchineseadults AT xiaohui determinantsofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessinnormalchineseadults AT laikunbei determinantsofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessinnormalchineseadults AT guoxinxing determinantsofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessinnormalchineseadults AT luojingyi determinantsofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessinnormalchineseadults AT liuxing determinantsofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessinnormalchineseadults |