Cargando…

Oncologic and long-term outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery in cancer surgeries — a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Clinical evidence has proved that enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) can improve short-term clinical outcomes after various types of surgeries, but the long-term benefits have not yet been examined, especially with respect to cancer surgeries. Therefore, a systematic review of the cu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pang, Qianyun, Duan, Liping, Jiang, Yan, Liu, Hongliang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34187485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02306-2
_version_ 1783715749568708608
author Pang, Qianyun
Duan, Liping
Jiang, Yan
Liu, Hongliang
author_facet Pang, Qianyun
Duan, Liping
Jiang, Yan
Liu, Hongliang
author_sort Pang, Qianyun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical evidence has proved that enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) can improve short-term clinical outcomes after various types of surgeries, but the long-term benefits have not yet been examined, especially with respect to cancer surgeries. Therefore, a systematic review of the current evidence was conducted. METHODS: The Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched using the following key words as search terms: “ERAS” or “enhanced recovery” or “fast track”, “oncologic outcome”, “recurrence”, “metastasis”, “long-term outcomes”, “survival”, and “cancer surgery”. The articles were screened using the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the data from the included studies were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of twenty-six articles were included in this review. Eighteen articles compared ERAS and conventional care, of which, 12 studies reported long-term overall survival (OS), and only 4 found the improvement by ERAS. Four studies reported disease-free survival (DFS), and only 1 found the improvement by ERAS. Five studies reported the outcomes of return to intended oncologic treatment after surgery (RIOT), and 4 found improvements in the ERAS group. Seven studies compared high adherence to ERAS with low adherence, of which, 6 reported the long-term OS, and 3 showed improvements by high adherence. One study reported high adherence could reduce the interval from surgery to RIOT. Four studies reported the effect of altering one single item within the ERAS protocol, but the results of 2 studies were controversial regarding the long-term OS between laparoscopic and open surgery, and 1 study showed improvements in OS with restrictive fluid therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ERAS in cancer surgeries can improve the on-time initiation and completion of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery, and the high adherence to ERAS can lead to better outcomes than low adherence. Based on the current evidence, it is difficult to determine whether the ERAS protocol is associated with long-term overall survival or cancer-specific survival. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02306-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8243430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82434302021-06-30 Oncologic and long-term outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery in cancer surgeries — a systematic review Pang, Qianyun Duan, Liping Jiang, Yan Liu, Hongliang World J Surg Oncol Review BACKGROUND: Clinical evidence has proved that enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) can improve short-term clinical outcomes after various types of surgeries, but the long-term benefits have not yet been examined, especially with respect to cancer surgeries. Therefore, a systematic review of the current evidence was conducted. METHODS: The Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched using the following key words as search terms: “ERAS” or “enhanced recovery” or “fast track”, “oncologic outcome”, “recurrence”, “metastasis”, “long-term outcomes”, “survival”, and “cancer surgery”. The articles were screened using the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the data from the included studies were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of twenty-six articles were included in this review. Eighteen articles compared ERAS and conventional care, of which, 12 studies reported long-term overall survival (OS), and only 4 found the improvement by ERAS. Four studies reported disease-free survival (DFS), and only 1 found the improvement by ERAS. Five studies reported the outcomes of return to intended oncologic treatment after surgery (RIOT), and 4 found improvements in the ERAS group. Seven studies compared high adherence to ERAS with low adherence, of which, 6 reported the long-term OS, and 3 showed improvements by high adherence. One study reported high adherence could reduce the interval from surgery to RIOT. Four studies reported the effect of altering one single item within the ERAS protocol, but the results of 2 studies were controversial regarding the long-term OS between laparoscopic and open surgery, and 1 study showed improvements in OS with restrictive fluid therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ERAS in cancer surgeries can improve the on-time initiation and completion of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery, and the high adherence to ERAS can lead to better outcomes than low adherence. Based on the current evidence, it is difficult to determine whether the ERAS protocol is associated with long-term overall survival or cancer-specific survival. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02306-2. BioMed Central 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8243430/ /pubmed/34187485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02306-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Pang, Qianyun
Duan, Liping
Jiang, Yan
Liu, Hongliang
Oncologic and long-term outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery in cancer surgeries — a systematic review
title Oncologic and long-term outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery in cancer surgeries — a systematic review
title_full Oncologic and long-term outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery in cancer surgeries — a systematic review
title_fullStr Oncologic and long-term outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery in cancer surgeries — a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Oncologic and long-term outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery in cancer surgeries — a systematic review
title_short Oncologic and long-term outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery in cancer surgeries — a systematic review
title_sort oncologic and long-term outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery in cancer surgeries — a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34187485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02306-2
work_keys_str_mv AT pangqianyun oncologicandlongtermoutcomesofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryincancersurgeriesasystematicreview
AT duanliping oncologicandlongtermoutcomesofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryincancersurgeriesasystematicreview
AT jiangyan oncologicandlongtermoutcomesofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryincancersurgeriesasystematicreview
AT liuhongliang oncologicandlongtermoutcomesofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryincancersurgeriesasystematicreview