Cargando…

Multi-institutional development and external validation of machine learning-based models to predict relapse risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after radical resection

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and the survival of patients after radical resection is closely related to relapse. We aimed to develop models to predict the risk of relapse using machine learning methods based on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xiawei, Yang, Litao, Yuan, Zheping, Lou, Jianyao, Fan, Yiqun, Shi, Aiguang, Huang, Junjie, Zhao, Mingchen, Wu, Yulian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34193166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-02955-7
_version_ 1783715758456438784
author Li, Xiawei
Yang, Litao
Yuan, Zheping
Lou, Jianyao
Fan, Yiqun
Shi, Aiguang
Huang, Junjie
Zhao, Mingchen
Wu, Yulian
author_facet Li, Xiawei
Yang, Litao
Yuan, Zheping
Lou, Jianyao
Fan, Yiqun
Shi, Aiguang
Huang, Junjie
Zhao, Mingchen
Wu, Yulian
author_sort Li, Xiawei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and the survival of patients after radical resection is closely related to relapse. We aimed to develop models to predict the risk of relapse using machine learning methods based on multiple clinical parameters. METHODS: Data were collected and analysed of 262 PDAC patients who underwent radical resection at 3 institutions between 2013 and 2017, with 183 from one institution as a training set, 79 from the other 2 institution as a validation set. We developed and compared several predictive models to predict 1- and 2-year relapse risk using machine learning approaches. RESULTS: Machine learning techniques were superior to conventional regression-based analyses in predicting risk of relapse of PDAC after radical resection. Among them, the random forest (RF) outperformed other methods in the training set. The highest accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for predicting 1-year relapse risk with RF were 78.4% and 0.834, respectively, and for 2-year relapse risk were 95.1% and 0.998. However, the support vector machine (SVM) model showed better performance than the others for predicting 1-year relapse risk in the validation set. And the k neighbor algorithm (KNN) model achieved the highest accuracy and AUROC for predicting 2-year relapse risk. CONCLUSIONS: By machine learning, this study has developed and validated comprehensive models integrating clinicopathological characteristics to predict the relapse risk of PDAC after radical resection which will guide the development of personalized surveillance programs after surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12967-021-02955-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8243478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82434782021-06-30 Multi-institutional development and external validation of machine learning-based models to predict relapse risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after radical resection Li, Xiawei Yang, Litao Yuan, Zheping Lou, Jianyao Fan, Yiqun Shi, Aiguang Huang, Junjie Zhao, Mingchen Wu, Yulian J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and the survival of patients after radical resection is closely related to relapse. We aimed to develop models to predict the risk of relapse using machine learning methods based on multiple clinical parameters. METHODS: Data were collected and analysed of 262 PDAC patients who underwent radical resection at 3 institutions between 2013 and 2017, with 183 from one institution as a training set, 79 from the other 2 institution as a validation set. We developed and compared several predictive models to predict 1- and 2-year relapse risk using machine learning approaches. RESULTS: Machine learning techniques were superior to conventional regression-based analyses in predicting risk of relapse of PDAC after radical resection. Among them, the random forest (RF) outperformed other methods in the training set. The highest accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for predicting 1-year relapse risk with RF were 78.4% and 0.834, respectively, and for 2-year relapse risk were 95.1% and 0.998. However, the support vector machine (SVM) model showed better performance than the others for predicting 1-year relapse risk in the validation set. And the k neighbor algorithm (KNN) model achieved the highest accuracy and AUROC for predicting 2-year relapse risk. CONCLUSIONS: By machine learning, this study has developed and validated comprehensive models integrating clinicopathological characteristics to predict the relapse risk of PDAC after radical resection which will guide the development of personalized surveillance programs after surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12967-021-02955-7. BioMed Central 2021-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8243478/ /pubmed/34193166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-02955-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Li, Xiawei
Yang, Litao
Yuan, Zheping
Lou, Jianyao
Fan, Yiqun
Shi, Aiguang
Huang, Junjie
Zhao, Mingchen
Wu, Yulian
Multi-institutional development and external validation of machine learning-based models to predict relapse risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after radical resection
title Multi-institutional development and external validation of machine learning-based models to predict relapse risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after radical resection
title_full Multi-institutional development and external validation of machine learning-based models to predict relapse risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after radical resection
title_fullStr Multi-institutional development and external validation of machine learning-based models to predict relapse risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after radical resection
title_full_unstemmed Multi-institutional development and external validation of machine learning-based models to predict relapse risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after radical resection
title_short Multi-institutional development and external validation of machine learning-based models to predict relapse risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after radical resection
title_sort multi-institutional development and external validation of machine learning-based models to predict relapse risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after radical resection
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34193166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-02955-7
work_keys_str_mv AT lixiawei multiinstitutionaldevelopmentandexternalvalidationofmachinelearningbasedmodelstopredictrelapseriskofpancreaticductaladenocarcinomaafterradicalresection
AT yanglitao multiinstitutionaldevelopmentandexternalvalidationofmachinelearningbasedmodelstopredictrelapseriskofpancreaticductaladenocarcinomaafterradicalresection
AT yuanzheping multiinstitutionaldevelopmentandexternalvalidationofmachinelearningbasedmodelstopredictrelapseriskofpancreaticductaladenocarcinomaafterradicalresection
AT loujianyao multiinstitutionaldevelopmentandexternalvalidationofmachinelearningbasedmodelstopredictrelapseriskofpancreaticductaladenocarcinomaafterradicalresection
AT fanyiqun multiinstitutionaldevelopmentandexternalvalidationofmachinelearningbasedmodelstopredictrelapseriskofpancreaticductaladenocarcinomaafterradicalresection
AT shiaiguang multiinstitutionaldevelopmentandexternalvalidationofmachinelearningbasedmodelstopredictrelapseriskofpancreaticductaladenocarcinomaafterradicalresection
AT huangjunjie multiinstitutionaldevelopmentandexternalvalidationofmachinelearningbasedmodelstopredictrelapseriskofpancreaticductaladenocarcinomaafterradicalresection
AT zhaomingchen multiinstitutionaldevelopmentandexternalvalidationofmachinelearningbasedmodelstopredictrelapseriskofpancreaticductaladenocarcinomaafterradicalresection
AT wuyulian multiinstitutionaldevelopmentandexternalvalidationofmachinelearningbasedmodelstopredictrelapseriskofpancreaticductaladenocarcinomaafterradicalresection