Cargando…

The effect of different types of in ovo selenium injection on the immunity, villi surface area, and growth performance of local chickens

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The presence of free radicals may lower chicken’s performance. Thus, the antioxidant defense is needed and can be made through a nutritional approach such as selenium supplementation before hatches. This study aimed to investigate the type of selenium that, as an in ovo feeding (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krisnan, Rantan, Retnani, Yuli, Tangendjaja, Budi, Mutia, Rita, Jayanegara, Anuraga, Wina, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Veterinary World 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34220110
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.1109-1115
_version_ 1783715795863339008
author Krisnan, Rantan
Retnani, Yuli
Tangendjaja, Budi
Mutia, Rita
Jayanegara, Anuraga
Wina, Elizabeth
author_facet Krisnan, Rantan
Retnani, Yuli
Tangendjaja, Budi
Mutia, Rita
Jayanegara, Anuraga
Wina, Elizabeth
author_sort Krisnan, Rantan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: The presence of free radicals may lower chicken’s performance. Thus, the antioxidant defense is needed and can be made through a nutritional approach such as selenium supplementation before hatches. This study aimed to investigate the type of selenium that, as an in ovo feeding (IOF) material, can provide the most enhancement of immunity, villi surface area, and early growth performance of local chickens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study, with a completely randomized design, used 480 fertile Kampung Unggul Balitbangtan (KUB, a selected local breed) chicken eggs, with 120 eggs per treatment for four treatments. The four treatments of IOF material included the treatment with organic selenium yeast (SY), organic hydroxy-selenomethionine (HSM), inorganic sodium selenite (SS), and uninjected selenium (control). A solution containing 0.15 ppm of different selenium was injected into the egg amnion after 18 days of incubation. Once hatched, the chicks were placed in three individual cages for each treatment (capacity of eight birds per cage). The parameters observed were the villi surface area, antibody titer, the number of total and differentiated leucocytes, glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity levels, and growth and feed efficiency of the early growth performance. RESULTS: All the in ovo selenium feeding, except SS, significantly affected the villi surface area, antibody titer, and lymphocyte and heterophil percentages; however, the feedings were still not optimal for enhancing antibody titers and total and differentiated leukocytes. All types of selenium were demonstrated to increase the activity of GSH-Px significantly compared to the control treatment (p<0.05). Furthermore, the daily gain and feed conversion ratio of the groups treated with SY and HSM was significantly improved compared to that of the control group. CONCLUSION: In ovo SY and HSM improve immunity significantly, villi surface areas and performance. Therefore, both types are the best nutrient ingredients of IOF for building immunity and producing good performance in chickens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8243682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Veterinary World
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82436822021-07-02 The effect of different types of in ovo selenium injection on the immunity, villi surface area, and growth performance of local chickens Krisnan, Rantan Retnani, Yuli Tangendjaja, Budi Mutia, Rita Jayanegara, Anuraga Wina, Elizabeth Vet World Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIM: The presence of free radicals may lower chicken’s performance. Thus, the antioxidant defense is needed and can be made through a nutritional approach such as selenium supplementation before hatches. This study aimed to investigate the type of selenium that, as an in ovo feeding (IOF) material, can provide the most enhancement of immunity, villi surface area, and early growth performance of local chickens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study, with a completely randomized design, used 480 fertile Kampung Unggul Balitbangtan (KUB, a selected local breed) chicken eggs, with 120 eggs per treatment for four treatments. The four treatments of IOF material included the treatment with organic selenium yeast (SY), organic hydroxy-selenomethionine (HSM), inorganic sodium selenite (SS), and uninjected selenium (control). A solution containing 0.15 ppm of different selenium was injected into the egg amnion after 18 days of incubation. Once hatched, the chicks were placed in three individual cages for each treatment (capacity of eight birds per cage). The parameters observed were the villi surface area, antibody titer, the number of total and differentiated leucocytes, glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity levels, and growth and feed efficiency of the early growth performance. RESULTS: All the in ovo selenium feeding, except SS, significantly affected the villi surface area, antibody titer, and lymphocyte and heterophil percentages; however, the feedings were still not optimal for enhancing antibody titers and total and differentiated leukocytes. All types of selenium were demonstrated to increase the activity of GSH-Px significantly compared to the control treatment (p<0.05). Furthermore, the daily gain and feed conversion ratio of the groups treated with SY and HSM was significantly improved compared to that of the control group. CONCLUSION: In ovo SY and HSM improve immunity significantly, villi surface areas and performance. Therefore, both types are the best nutrient ingredients of IOF for building immunity and producing good performance in chickens. Veterinary World 2021-05 2021-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8243682/ /pubmed/34220110 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.1109-1115 Text en Copyright: © Krisnan, et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Krisnan, Rantan
Retnani, Yuli
Tangendjaja, Budi
Mutia, Rita
Jayanegara, Anuraga
Wina, Elizabeth
The effect of different types of in ovo selenium injection on the immunity, villi surface area, and growth performance of local chickens
title The effect of different types of in ovo selenium injection on the immunity, villi surface area, and growth performance of local chickens
title_full The effect of different types of in ovo selenium injection on the immunity, villi surface area, and growth performance of local chickens
title_fullStr The effect of different types of in ovo selenium injection on the immunity, villi surface area, and growth performance of local chickens
title_full_unstemmed The effect of different types of in ovo selenium injection on the immunity, villi surface area, and growth performance of local chickens
title_short The effect of different types of in ovo selenium injection on the immunity, villi surface area, and growth performance of local chickens
title_sort effect of different types of in ovo selenium injection on the immunity, villi surface area, and growth performance of local chickens
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34220110
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.1109-1115
work_keys_str_mv AT krisnanrantan theeffectofdifferenttypesofinovoseleniuminjectionontheimmunityvillisurfaceareaandgrowthperformanceoflocalchickens
AT retnaniyuli theeffectofdifferenttypesofinovoseleniuminjectionontheimmunityvillisurfaceareaandgrowthperformanceoflocalchickens
AT tangendjajabudi theeffectofdifferenttypesofinovoseleniuminjectionontheimmunityvillisurfaceareaandgrowthperformanceoflocalchickens
AT mutiarita theeffectofdifferenttypesofinovoseleniuminjectionontheimmunityvillisurfaceareaandgrowthperformanceoflocalchickens
AT jayanegaraanuraga theeffectofdifferenttypesofinovoseleniuminjectionontheimmunityvillisurfaceareaandgrowthperformanceoflocalchickens
AT winaelizabeth theeffectofdifferenttypesofinovoseleniuminjectionontheimmunityvillisurfaceareaandgrowthperformanceoflocalchickens
AT krisnanrantan effectofdifferenttypesofinovoseleniuminjectionontheimmunityvillisurfaceareaandgrowthperformanceoflocalchickens
AT retnaniyuli effectofdifferenttypesofinovoseleniuminjectionontheimmunityvillisurfaceareaandgrowthperformanceoflocalchickens
AT tangendjajabudi effectofdifferenttypesofinovoseleniuminjectionontheimmunityvillisurfaceareaandgrowthperformanceoflocalchickens
AT mutiarita effectofdifferenttypesofinovoseleniuminjectionontheimmunityvillisurfaceareaandgrowthperformanceoflocalchickens
AT jayanegaraanuraga effectofdifferenttypesofinovoseleniuminjectionontheimmunityvillisurfaceareaandgrowthperformanceoflocalchickens
AT winaelizabeth effectofdifferenttypesofinovoseleniuminjectionontheimmunityvillisurfaceareaandgrowthperformanceoflocalchickens