Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of isoflurane and sevoflurane in avian patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Literature comparing the use of isoflurane and sevoflurane inhalation anesthetic agents in birds is scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the comparison of isoflurane and sevoflurane during induction, maintenance, and recovery of anesthesia in avian patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anjana, R. R., Parikh, P. V., Mahla, J. K., Kelawala, D. N., Patel, K. P., Ashwath, S. N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Veterinary World 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34220105
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.1067-1073
_version_ 1783715798688202752
author Anjana, R. R.
Parikh, P. V.
Mahla, J. K.
Kelawala, D. N.
Patel, K. P.
Ashwath, S. N.
author_facet Anjana, R. R.
Parikh, P. V.
Mahla, J. K.
Kelawala, D. N.
Patel, K. P.
Ashwath, S. N.
author_sort Anjana, R. R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: Literature comparing the use of isoflurane and sevoflurane inhalation anesthetic agents in birds is scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the comparison of isoflurane and sevoflurane during induction, maintenance, and recovery of anesthesia in avian patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 24 injured avian patients (n=24) were selected randomly and divided into four groups during kite flying festival. In the present study, isoflurane and sevoflurane were used as induction and maintenance anesthetic agents, with and without butorphanol tartrate premedication agent in all the birds. Different physiological parameters were evaluated, namely, cloacal temperature (°F), heart rate (beats/min), respiratory rate (breaths/min), and SpO(2) (%) were recorded at 0, 10, 20 min, and at recovery time. The quality of anesthesia was assessed on the basis of induction time, quality of induction, production of analgesia, muscle relaxation, body reflexes, recovery time, quality of recovery, sitting, standing, and complete recovery time (CRT). RESULTS: The mean±standard error value of induction time was 230.00±32.55, 280.00±25.29, 180.00±21.90, and 260.00±36.87 s, respectively, in Groups I, II, III, and IV. The feather plucking, pharyngeal, and toe pinching reflexes were noticed, when the birds were passing through the light plane of anesthesia during induction. Comparison of cloacal temperature at the time of recovery between Group-I versus Group-III revealed a significant difference (p<0.05). Comparison of mean respiratory rates at the time of recovery between Group-II versus Group-IV revealed a significant difference (p<0.05). Excellent quality of recovery was observed in all the groups of anesthetic protocols. Sitting, standing, and CRT were observed shortest in avian patients maintained with sevoflurane as compared to isoflurane. CONCLUSION: The quality of induction of anesthesia was rapid in avian patients when induced with sevoflurane as compared to isoflurane. Rapid onset of induction and recovery of anesthesia were found with sevoflurane followed by isoflurane. Induction and maintenance of anesthesia in avian patients with sevoflurane resulted in the lowest time required for sitting, standing, and CRT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8243694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Veterinary World
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82436942021-07-02 Comparative evaluation of isoflurane and sevoflurane in avian patients Anjana, R. R. Parikh, P. V. Mahla, J. K. Kelawala, D. N. Patel, K. P. Ashwath, S. N. Vet World Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIM: Literature comparing the use of isoflurane and sevoflurane inhalation anesthetic agents in birds is scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the comparison of isoflurane and sevoflurane during induction, maintenance, and recovery of anesthesia in avian patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 24 injured avian patients (n=24) were selected randomly and divided into four groups during kite flying festival. In the present study, isoflurane and sevoflurane were used as induction and maintenance anesthetic agents, with and without butorphanol tartrate premedication agent in all the birds. Different physiological parameters were evaluated, namely, cloacal temperature (°F), heart rate (beats/min), respiratory rate (breaths/min), and SpO(2) (%) were recorded at 0, 10, 20 min, and at recovery time. The quality of anesthesia was assessed on the basis of induction time, quality of induction, production of analgesia, muscle relaxation, body reflexes, recovery time, quality of recovery, sitting, standing, and complete recovery time (CRT). RESULTS: The mean±standard error value of induction time was 230.00±32.55, 280.00±25.29, 180.00±21.90, and 260.00±36.87 s, respectively, in Groups I, II, III, and IV. The feather plucking, pharyngeal, and toe pinching reflexes were noticed, when the birds were passing through the light plane of anesthesia during induction. Comparison of cloacal temperature at the time of recovery between Group-I versus Group-III revealed a significant difference (p<0.05). Comparison of mean respiratory rates at the time of recovery between Group-II versus Group-IV revealed a significant difference (p<0.05). Excellent quality of recovery was observed in all the groups of anesthetic protocols. Sitting, standing, and CRT were observed shortest in avian patients maintained with sevoflurane as compared to isoflurane. CONCLUSION: The quality of induction of anesthesia was rapid in avian patients when induced with sevoflurane as compared to isoflurane. Rapid onset of induction and recovery of anesthesia were found with sevoflurane followed by isoflurane. Induction and maintenance of anesthesia in avian patients with sevoflurane resulted in the lowest time required for sitting, standing, and CRT. Veterinary World 2021-05 2021-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8243694/ /pubmed/34220105 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.1067-1073 Text en Copyright: © Anjana, et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Anjana, R. R.
Parikh, P. V.
Mahla, J. K.
Kelawala, D. N.
Patel, K. P.
Ashwath, S. N.
Comparative evaluation of isoflurane and sevoflurane in avian patients
title Comparative evaluation of isoflurane and sevoflurane in avian patients
title_full Comparative evaluation of isoflurane and sevoflurane in avian patients
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of isoflurane and sevoflurane in avian patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of isoflurane and sevoflurane in avian patients
title_short Comparative evaluation of isoflurane and sevoflurane in avian patients
title_sort comparative evaluation of isoflurane and sevoflurane in avian patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34220105
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.1067-1073
work_keys_str_mv AT anjanarr comparativeevaluationofisofluraneandsevofluraneinavianpatients
AT parikhpv comparativeevaluationofisofluraneandsevofluraneinavianpatients
AT mahlajk comparativeevaluationofisofluraneandsevofluraneinavianpatients
AT kelawaladn comparativeevaluationofisofluraneandsevofluraneinavianpatients
AT patelkp comparativeevaluationofisofluraneandsevofluraneinavianpatients
AT ashwathsn comparativeevaluationofisofluraneandsevofluraneinavianpatients