Cargando…
Potentially redundant repeat liver function test ordering practices in australian hospitals: A 5‐year multicentre retrospective observational study
BACKGROUND: Repeat Liver Function Tests (LFTs) are often necessary for monitoring purposes, but retesting within a short time interval may suggest potentially redundant repeat test (PRRT) ordering practices. We aimed to determine the proportion of potentially redundant repeat LFT ordering and identi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33400343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14004 |
_version_ | 1783715826225905664 |
---|---|
author | Wabe, Nasir Hardie, Rae‐Anne Lindeman, Robert Scowen, Craig Eigenstetter, Alex Georgiou, Andrew |
author_facet | Wabe, Nasir Hardie, Rae‐Anne Lindeman, Robert Scowen, Craig Eigenstetter, Alex Georgiou, Andrew |
author_sort | Wabe, Nasir |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Repeat Liver Function Tests (LFTs) are often necessary for monitoring purposes, but retesting within a short time interval may suggest potentially redundant repeat test (PRRT) ordering practices. We aimed to determine the proportion of potentially redundant repeat LFT ordering and identify associated factors in hospitals. METHODS: A 5‐year (2014‐2018) retrospective cohort study in six hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. A total of 131 885 patient admissions with repeat LFTs in the general ward (n = 102 852) and intensive care unit (ICU) (n = 29 033) met the inclusion criteria. Existing guidelines do not support retesting LFT for at least 48‐72 hours. We used 24 hours as a conservative minimum retesting interval to examine PRRT ordering. We fit binary logistic regression to identify factors associated with PRRT ordering in two conditions with the highest repeat LFTs. RESULTS: There were a total of 298 567 repeat LFTs (medians of 2 repeats/admission and retesting interval of 25.6 hours) in the general ward and 205 929 (medians of 4 repeats/admission and retesting interval of 24.1 hours) in the ICU. The proportions of PRRT ordering were 35.2% (105 227/298 567) and 47.7% (98 307/205 929) in the general ward and ICU, respectively. The proportions of patients who received at least one PRRT were 52.3% (53 766/102 852) and 83.9% (24 365/29 033) in the general ward and ICU, respectively. Age, gender and the number of comorbidities and procedures were associated with the likelihood of ordering PRRT depending on the settings. CONCLUSION: Repeat LFT testing is common in Australian hospitals, often within 24 hours, despite guidelines not supporting too‐early repeat testing. Further research should be conducted to understand whether better adherence to existing guidelines is required, or if there is any case for guidelines to be updated based on certain patient subpopulations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8243922 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82439222021-07-02 Potentially redundant repeat liver function test ordering practices in australian hospitals: A 5‐year multicentre retrospective observational study Wabe, Nasir Hardie, Rae‐Anne Lindeman, Robert Scowen, Craig Eigenstetter, Alex Georgiou, Andrew Int J Clin Pract Original Papers BACKGROUND: Repeat Liver Function Tests (LFTs) are often necessary for monitoring purposes, but retesting within a short time interval may suggest potentially redundant repeat test (PRRT) ordering practices. We aimed to determine the proportion of potentially redundant repeat LFT ordering and identify associated factors in hospitals. METHODS: A 5‐year (2014‐2018) retrospective cohort study in six hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. A total of 131 885 patient admissions with repeat LFTs in the general ward (n = 102 852) and intensive care unit (ICU) (n = 29 033) met the inclusion criteria. Existing guidelines do not support retesting LFT for at least 48‐72 hours. We used 24 hours as a conservative minimum retesting interval to examine PRRT ordering. We fit binary logistic regression to identify factors associated with PRRT ordering in two conditions with the highest repeat LFTs. RESULTS: There were a total of 298 567 repeat LFTs (medians of 2 repeats/admission and retesting interval of 25.6 hours) in the general ward and 205 929 (medians of 4 repeats/admission and retesting interval of 24.1 hours) in the ICU. The proportions of PRRT ordering were 35.2% (105 227/298 567) and 47.7% (98 307/205 929) in the general ward and ICU, respectively. The proportions of patients who received at least one PRRT were 52.3% (53 766/102 852) and 83.9% (24 365/29 033) in the general ward and ICU, respectively. Age, gender and the number of comorbidities and procedures were associated with the likelihood of ordering PRRT depending on the settings. CONCLUSION: Repeat LFT testing is common in Australian hospitals, often within 24 hours, despite guidelines not supporting too‐early repeat testing. Further research should be conducted to understand whether better adherence to existing guidelines is required, or if there is any case for guidelines to be updated based on certain patient subpopulations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-21 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8243922/ /pubmed/33400343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14004 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Journal of Clinical Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Papers Wabe, Nasir Hardie, Rae‐Anne Lindeman, Robert Scowen, Craig Eigenstetter, Alex Georgiou, Andrew Potentially redundant repeat liver function test ordering practices in australian hospitals: A 5‐year multicentre retrospective observational study |
title | Potentially redundant repeat liver function test ordering practices in australian hospitals: A 5‐year multicentre retrospective observational study |
title_full | Potentially redundant repeat liver function test ordering practices in australian hospitals: A 5‐year multicentre retrospective observational study |
title_fullStr | Potentially redundant repeat liver function test ordering practices in australian hospitals: A 5‐year multicentre retrospective observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Potentially redundant repeat liver function test ordering practices in australian hospitals: A 5‐year multicentre retrospective observational study |
title_short | Potentially redundant repeat liver function test ordering practices in australian hospitals: A 5‐year multicentre retrospective observational study |
title_sort | potentially redundant repeat liver function test ordering practices in australian hospitals: a 5‐year multicentre retrospective observational study |
topic | Original Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33400343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wabenasir potentiallyredundantrepeatliverfunctiontestorderingpracticesinaustralianhospitalsa5yearmulticentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT hardieraeanne potentiallyredundantrepeatliverfunctiontestorderingpracticesinaustralianhospitalsa5yearmulticentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT lindemanrobert potentiallyredundantrepeatliverfunctiontestorderingpracticesinaustralianhospitalsa5yearmulticentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT scowencraig potentiallyredundantrepeatliverfunctiontestorderingpracticesinaustralianhospitalsa5yearmulticentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT eigenstetteralex potentiallyredundantrepeatliverfunctiontestorderingpracticesinaustralianhospitalsa5yearmulticentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT georgiouandrew potentiallyredundantrepeatliverfunctiontestorderingpracticesinaustralianhospitalsa5yearmulticentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy |