Cargando…

Potentially redundant repeat liver function test ordering practices in australian hospitals: A 5‐year multicentre retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND: Repeat Liver Function Tests (LFTs) are often necessary for monitoring purposes, but retesting within a short time interval may suggest potentially redundant repeat test (PRRT) ordering practices. We aimed to determine the proportion of potentially redundant repeat LFT ordering and identi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wabe, Nasir, Hardie, Rae‐Anne, Lindeman, Robert, Scowen, Craig, Eigenstetter, Alex, Georgiou, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33400343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14004
_version_ 1783715826225905664
author Wabe, Nasir
Hardie, Rae‐Anne
Lindeman, Robert
Scowen, Craig
Eigenstetter, Alex
Georgiou, Andrew
author_facet Wabe, Nasir
Hardie, Rae‐Anne
Lindeman, Robert
Scowen, Craig
Eigenstetter, Alex
Georgiou, Andrew
author_sort Wabe, Nasir
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Repeat Liver Function Tests (LFTs) are often necessary for monitoring purposes, but retesting within a short time interval may suggest potentially redundant repeat test (PRRT) ordering practices. We aimed to determine the proportion of potentially redundant repeat LFT ordering and identify associated factors in hospitals. METHODS: A 5‐year (2014‐2018) retrospective cohort study in six hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. A total of 131 885 patient admissions with repeat LFTs in the general ward (n = 102 852) and intensive care unit (ICU) (n = 29 033) met the inclusion criteria. Existing guidelines do not support retesting LFT for at least 48‐72 hours. We used 24 hours as a conservative minimum retesting interval to examine PRRT ordering. We fit binary logistic regression to identify factors associated with PRRT ordering in two conditions with the highest repeat LFTs. RESULTS: There were a total of 298 567 repeat LFTs (medians of 2 repeats/admission and retesting interval of 25.6 hours) in the general ward and 205 929 (medians of 4 repeats/admission and retesting interval of 24.1 hours) in the ICU. The proportions of PRRT ordering were 35.2% (105 227/298 567) and 47.7% (98 307/205 929) in the general ward and ICU, respectively. The proportions of patients who received at least one PRRT were 52.3% (53 766/102 852) and 83.9% (24 365/29 033) in the general ward and ICU, respectively. Age, gender and the number of comorbidities and procedures were associated with the likelihood of ordering PRRT depending on the settings. CONCLUSION: Repeat LFT testing is common in Australian hospitals, often within 24 hours, despite guidelines not supporting too‐early repeat testing. Further research should be conducted to understand whether better adherence to existing guidelines is required, or if there is any case for guidelines to be updated based on certain patient subpopulations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8243922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82439222021-07-02 Potentially redundant repeat liver function test ordering practices in australian hospitals: A 5‐year multicentre retrospective observational study Wabe, Nasir Hardie, Rae‐Anne Lindeman, Robert Scowen, Craig Eigenstetter, Alex Georgiou, Andrew Int J Clin Pract Original Papers BACKGROUND: Repeat Liver Function Tests (LFTs) are often necessary for monitoring purposes, but retesting within a short time interval may suggest potentially redundant repeat test (PRRT) ordering practices. We aimed to determine the proportion of potentially redundant repeat LFT ordering and identify associated factors in hospitals. METHODS: A 5‐year (2014‐2018) retrospective cohort study in six hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. A total of 131 885 patient admissions with repeat LFTs in the general ward (n = 102 852) and intensive care unit (ICU) (n = 29 033) met the inclusion criteria. Existing guidelines do not support retesting LFT for at least 48‐72 hours. We used 24 hours as a conservative minimum retesting interval to examine PRRT ordering. We fit binary logistic regression to identify factors associated with PRRT ordering in two conditions with the highest repeat LFTs. RESULTS: There were a total of 298 567 repeat LFTs (medians of 2 repeats/admission and retesting interval of 25.6 hours) in the general ward and 205 929 (medians of 4 repeats/admission and retesting interval of 24.1 hours) in the ICU. The proportions of PRRT ordering were 35.2% (105 227/298 567) and 47.7% (98 307/205 929) in the general ward and ICU, respectively. The proportions of patients who received at least one PRRT were 52.3% (53 766/102 852) and 83.9% (24 365/29 033) in the general ward and ICU, respectively. Age, gender and the number of comorbidities and procedures were associated with the likelihood of ordering PRRT depending on the settings. CONCLUSION: Repeat LFT testing is common in Australian hospitals, often within 24 hours, despite guidelines not supporting too‐early repeat testing. Further research should be conducted to understand whether better adherence to existing guidelines is required, or if there is any case for guidelines to be updated based on certain patient subpopulations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-21 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8243922/ /pubmed/33400343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14004 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Journal of Clinical Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Wabe, Nasir
Hardie, Rae‐Anne
Lindeman, Robert
Scowen, Craig
Eigenstetter, Alex
Georgiou, Andrew
Potentially redundant repeat liver function test ordering practices in australian hospitals: A 5‐year multicentre retrospective observational study
title Potentially redundant repeat liver function test ordering practices in australian hospitals: A 5‐year multicentre retrospective observational study
title_full Potentially redundant repeat liver function test ordering practices in australian hospitals: A 5‐year multicentre retrospective observational study
title_fullStr Potentially redundant repeat liver function test ordering practices in australian hospitals: A 5‐year multicentre retrospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Potentially redundant repeat liver function test ordering practices in australian hospitals: A 5‐year multicentre retrospective observational study
title_short Potentially redundant repeat liver function test ordering practices in australian hospitals: A 5‐year multicentre retrospective observational study
title_sort potentially redundant repeat liver function test ordering practices in australian hospitals: a 5‐year multicentre retrospective observational study
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33400343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14004
work_keys_str_mv AT wabenasir potentiallyredundantrepeatliverfunctiontestorderingpracticesinaustralianhospitalsa5yearmulticentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT hardieraeanne potentiallyredundantrepeatliverfunctiontestorderingpracticesinaustralianhospitalsa5yearmulticentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT lindemanrobert potentiallyredundantrepeatliverfunctiontestorderingpracticesinaustralianhospitalsa5yearmulticentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT scowencraig potentiallyredundantrepeatliverfunctiontestorderingpracticesinaustralianhospitalsa5yearmulticentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT eigenstetteralex potentiallyredundantrepeatliverfunctiontestorderingpracticesinaustralianhospitalsa5yearmulticentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT georgiouandrew potentiallyredundantrepeatliverfunctiontestorderingpracticesinaustralianhospitalsa5yearmulticentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy