Cargando…

What is the problem of dependency? Dependency work reconsidered

Dependency is fundamental to caring relationships. However, given that dependency implies asymmetry, it also brings moral problems for nursing. In nursing theory and theories of care, dependency tends to be framed as a problem of self‐determination—a tendency that is mirrored in contemporary policy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Weele, Simon, Bredewold, Femmianne, Leget, Carlo, Tonkens, Evelien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32935457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nup.12327
_version_ 1783715835980808192
author van der Weele, Simon
Bredewold, Femmianne
Leget, Carlo
Tonkens, Evelien
author_facet van der Weele, Simon
Bredewold, Femmianne
Leget, Carlo
Tonkens, Evelien
author_sort van der Weele, Simon
collection PubMed
description Dependency is fundamental to caring relationships. However, given that dependency implies asymmetry, it also brings moral problems for nursing. In nursing theory and theories of care, dependency tends to be framed as a problem of self‐determination—a tendency that is mirrored in contemporary policy and practice. This paper argues that this problem frame is too narrow. The aim of the paper is to articulate additional theoretical ‘problem frames’ for dependency and to increase our understanding of how dependency can be navigated in practices of long‐term care. It does so by way of an empirical ethical analysis of how care professionals tackle the problem of dependency in group homes for people with intellectual disabilities. The paper refers to these practices of mitigating the problem of dependency as ‘dependency work’, a phrase borrowed from Eva Kittay. The analysis of dependency work suggests that for care professionals, dependency is a threefold problem: one of self‐determination, one of parity and one of self‐worth. These findings suggest that patient autonomy cannot be a full solution to the problem of dependency in long‐term care relations. But they also show that dependency as such is not a problem that can be solved, as attempts to mitigate it only serve to tighten the dependency relationship further. This is the paradox of dependency work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8243965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82439652021-07-02 What is the problem of dependency? Dependency work reconsidered van der Weele, Simon Bredewold, Femmianne Leget, Carlo Tonkens, Evelien Nurs Philos Original Articles Dependency is fundamental to caring relationships. However, given that dependency implies asymmetry, it also brings moral problems for nursing. In nursing theory and theories of care, dependency tends to be framed as a problem of self‐determination—a tendency that is mirrored in contemporary policy and practice. This paper argues that this problem frame is too narrow. The aim of the paper is to articulate additional theoretical ‘problem frames’ for dependency and to increase our understanding of how dependency can be navigated in practices of long‐term care. It does so by way of an empirical ethical analysis of how care professionals tackle the problem of dependency in group homes for people with intellectual disabilities. The paper refers to these practices of mitigating the problem of dependency as ‘dependency work’, a phrase borrowed from Eva Kittay. The analysis of dependency work suggests that for care professionals, dependency is a threefold problem: one of self‐determination, one of parity and one of self‐worth. These findings suggest that patient autonomy cannot be a full solution to the problem of dependency in long‐term care relations. But they also show that dependency as such is not a problem that can be solved, as attempts to mitigate it only serve to tighten the dependency relationship further. This is the paradox of dependency work. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-15 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8243965/ /pubmed/32935457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nup.12327 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Nursing Philosophy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
van der Weele, Simon
Bredewold, Femmianne
Leget, Carlo
Tonkens, Evelien
What is the problem of dependency? Dependency work reconsidered
title What is the problem of dependency? Dependency work reconsidered
title_full What is the problem of dependency? Dependency work reconsidered
title_fullStr What is the problem of dependency? Dependency work reconsidered
title_full_unstemmed What is the problem of dependency? Dependency work reconsidered
title_short What is the problem of dependency? Dependency work reconsidered
title_sort what is the problem of dependency? dependency work reconsidered
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8243965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32935457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nup.12327
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderweelesimon whatistheproblemofdependencydependencyworkreconsidered
AT bredewoldfemmianne whatistheproblemofdependencydependencyworkreconsidered
AT legetcarlo whatistheproblemofdependencydependencyworkreconsidered
AT tonkensevelien whatistheproblemofdependencydependencyworkreconsidered